Sustainability of Heating with Wood

Save money and keep your home warm during the winter by heating with wood.

| November 2014

  • Heating With Wood
    Although heating with wood is not for everyone, those who are willing to gather, chop and season their own firewood can significantly reduce the cost of energy during winter.
    Photo by Fotolia/Mikhail Olykainen
  • Energy Generation Content
    The energy content inside of one cord or tonne of wood is significantly greater than what is contained within one kilowatt-hour, cubic meter or liter.
    Illustration courtesy Firefly Books
  • Heating Systems Efficiency
    Though some older models of woodstoves burned at less efficient rates, ranging from 35 percent to 55 percent efficiency, newer, CSA- and EPA-certified woodstoves produce less pollution and are 70 percent efficient.
    Illustration courtesy Firefly Books
  • Wood Heat
    “Wood Heat” by Andrew Jones is a practical, comprehensive guide to help you consider the issues associated with using wood to heat your home.
    Cover courtesy Firely Books

  • Heating With Wood
  • Energy Generation Content
  • Heating Systems Efficiency
  • Wood Heat

Want to heat your rural home without gas or coal? In Wood Heat (Firefly Books, 2014), author Andrew Jones provides a useful guide to using wood to heat your home. Jones dissects the environmental and economical upsides and downsides of heating with wood while providing advice and instructions that are necessary to help you successfully produce enough energy to keep your home warm during the winter. This excerpt, which discusses the sustainability of wood heating, is from Chapter 1, “Who Burns Wood?”

You can buy this book from the MOTHER EARTH NEWS store: Wood Heat.

Environmental Impact of Heating with Wood

Wood is not a perfect fuel, but does such a thing exist? All energy generation and consumption by nature creates unwanted by-products, and impassioned arguments about the legacies of coal and uranium mining and natural gas and oil extraction are ongoing. Even famously “clean” energy sources like wind and solar power have been found to have a detrimental impact on the environment.

The biggest drawback and major environmental impact of wood burning is, of course, visible for all to see—wood-smoke pollution. Three aspects of this pollution are discussed and debated, sometimes hotly: nuisance smoke (caused by neighbors inefficiently heating their homes); air-shed contamination (caused by too much smoke produced in areas with a depressed topography, such as a river valley, which is prone to temperature inversions in the winter that trap smoke close to the ground); and indoor air pollution (caused by leaky or inefficient in-house wood-burning appliances).



There is no getting away from the fact that burning wood produces smoke, which is unhealthy to breathe in high concentrations. Even in low concentrations, it can be harmful to children, the elderly and people with lung diseases or allergies. Those who would like to curb wood burning in some communities point out that wood smoke contains toxic chemicals like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins as well as known carcinogens such as furans and acrolein. This despite the fact that a poorly fired backyard barbecue or a city bus can emit equally noxious substances.

The good news is that the new wood-burning technology built into today’s certified stoves goes a long way toward addressing all three aspects of wood-smoke pollution. Thanks to the four decades of research since the 1970s oil crisis, we know a great deal more about wood burning. Advanced-technology stoves, inserts, fireplaces and furnaces can reduce wood smoke by up to 90 percent when compared with older, so-called airtight stoves.

For example, older woodstoves emit, on average, at least 25 grams of smoke per hour of operation (g/h), while the emissions from older wood-fired outdoor boilers can range between 50 g/h to 100 g/h. In contrast, both U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations and the Canadian Standards Association’s Performance Testing of Solid-Fuel-Burning Heating Appliances (CSA B415.1) limit emissions of certified non-catalytic wood-burning stoves to no more than 4.5 g/h. Since these regulations were first established in 2000, the average emissions of certified stoves have declined steadily due to advances in technology and healthy competition between manufacturers. Many woodstove models on the market today emit only 2 g/h to 4 g/h.

By burning and not wasting the energy-rich smoke, these stoves increase the efficiency of providing heat to the home. Older stoves were grossly inefficient, with efficiency rates as low as 35 percent for a cast-iron box stove to 55 percent for a so-called airtight model in the 1970s. CSA- and EPA-certified woodstoves spill less smoke into the indoor air because fires don’t tend to smolder in them, with the average being around 70 percent efficient. Even the new breed of emissions-certified outdoor boilers are much more efficient.

This efficiency translates directly into less smoke going up the flue and minimizes the telltale gray clouds billowing from chimneys. Multiply that across a small community of wood-burning homes, and both nuisance smoke and air-shed contamination are taken care of in one stroke.

So wood burning’s environmental triple threat—air-shed contamination, nuisance neighbors and indoor air pollution—can be addressed by upgrading home and wood-burning equipment to the latest efficiency standards, launching public information and awareness campaigns and, where necessary, updating regulations.

Sustainability of Heating with Wood

Is wood heating environmentally sustainable? The answer to this question hinges on two contentious issues: greenhouse gas emissions and deforestation. The oft-cited argument that burning wood increases the amount of carbon dioxide going into the atmosphere tells only half the story. The carbon dioxide would, in any case, be emitted by these trees when they die, and young trees actually absorb carbon dioxide, rendering wood-burning greenhouse gas neutral and the net carbon dioxide emissions far below those of fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas, which are extracted from deep beneath the Earth’s surface and whose carbon dioxide emissions add to greenhouse gas in the atmosphere.

As for deforestation, large parts of Canada and the northern United States are relatively thinly populated and have highly productive forests. These are the regions where wood heating makes sense. Foresters have claimed wood burning could double in most of these regions without unduly straining forestry resources, as long as selective harvesting is used to thin dense stands and remove poor-quality trees, and seed trees of a wide variety of species and ages are left standing.

Indeed, the careful work by generations of farmers and other woodlot owners, visible in healthy, productive woodlots that have consistently produced wood for home heating, provides a blueprint for stewardship that the entire forest industry can follow.

It has often been said that a healthy, well-managed woodlot can yield a cord of wood per 2-1/2 acres (1 ha) per year forever and that a 12-acre (5 ha) woodlot could sustainably produce enough firewood each year to fully heat a house. While true as a rule of thumb, it needs a little updating. It takes a lot less than 5 cords of wood to heat a new energy-efficient house using a modern wood-burning stove. Indeed, with the efficiencies offered by today’s wood-burning appliances, additional homes could be heated from the same woodlot.



Yet despite its considerable advantages, firewood is not the magic bullet that will solve the problems of global warming. Heating with wood is not a meaningful option for all homes, such as multi-family dwellings in urban downtown cores, where regulations forbid it and where the air is already choked with pollution from industry and transportation. Finally, as we mentioned earlier, a winter’s worth of wood takes up a lot of space, and feeding fires all winter requires a heightened level of physical fitness and attentiveness. Clearly, wood heating is not for everyone.

But for those who live outside major cities, in small towns and rural areas, where both population density and the cost of firewood are lower, and for those who are looking to offset their monthly home-heating bill and provide some nostalgic warmth in the bargain, it just might be worth honing up on your chopping, stacking and kindling skills.

The Relative Efficiency of Heating with Wood

Firewood is typically consumed in three ways: It is burned in a decorative fireplace; it is used as a supplementary energy source to heat a basement, a family room or an extension to the house; or it serves as a primary heating source. The first is likely to occur in cities, the second is the largest segment of wood use for home heating, and the third is commonplace in rural areas.

If you are considering the second or third scenario, you may well ask whether wood heating is really economically viable in this day and age. The quick answer is yes. Dollar for dollar, wood burning is a cheaper way to heat your home than are conventional fuel sources such as oil, natural gas and electricity. Exactly how much cheaper depends on the type of home you want to heat, where you live and the local cost of various fuel types.

These models serve as a rough guide only and address heating the entire house to an even temperature throughout. Maybe you want to heat just a single room with a woodstove. Even in that case, switching to wood burning could reduce the energy needed to heat this room by as much as 25 percent.

The real answer, however, is more complex and lies in how willing you are to adopt a wood-burning lifestyle. Monetary costs are only the beginning. Heating with wood is hands-on, intensive and messy. Consider the following questions before you decide. Do you have the space outside to cover and store a winter’s supply of firewood? Do you have space inside your house to accommodate a few days’ supply in anticipation of those winter storms that close down the roads? Do you have the physical strength and stamina required to split, move and stack firewood on a regular basis? Do you have time to devote to managing your newfangled fuel supply, tend fires and deal with new maintenance tasks like hauling out ashes? Can you put up with wood chips scattered throughout your house?

If your answer to these questions is, for the most part, yes, then you have what it takes to make the switch.

The Value and Satisfaction of Heating with Wood

Heating with wood is about a lot more than warming your home. It is a tangible expression of self-reliance, of the courage it takes to buck the trends and resist the lure of a sedentary, always-connected existence. Producing fuel to heat the family home during a long, cold northern winter is an accomplishment with significant meaning for those who are up to the task. The sense of personal commitment to social and environmental responsibility it can provide is powerful but rarely seen in the mainstream media, where bike marathons for charitable causes rule the day. Heating with wood will teach you more about the ethical cause-and-effect relationships of energy production and consumption than simply paying a utility bill. Heating with wood reinforces links to the land and represents a willing submission to the cycle of the seasons. It provides stability and security in a turbulent world.

Want to learn more about heating your home with firewood? Learn some Tips to Properly Seasoning Firewood.


This excerpt has been reprinted with permission from Wood Heat, by Andrew Jones, published by Firefly Books, 2014. Buy this book from our store: Wood Heat.

rickVT
11/21/2014 5:01:42 PM

Sorry did not keep formatting. Bottom line Wood=$13.64 per MMBtu Oil=$34.98 per MMBtu


rickVT
11/21/2014 4:54:11 PM

The article starts off with “ … firewood can significantly reduce the cost of energy during winter.” I only started burning wood a few years ago, and had to justify the cost of stove etc. to my wife, showing the savings advantage of burning wood over fuel oil. I stumbled on the Vermont public service site comparing costs per million btu for various heating fuels, for an apple to apple comparison. Retrieved 11/21/14 from: http://publicservice.vermont.gov/publications/fuel_report Comparing the Cost of Heating Fuels April 2011 Type of Energy BTU/unit $/unit $/MMBtu Fuel Oil, gallon 138,200 $3.87 $34.98 Wood, cord(green) 22,000,000 $180.00 $13.64 Kerosene, gallon 136,600 $4.22 $38.62 Propane, gallon 91,600 $3.37 $46.00 Natural Gas, therm 100,000 $1.55 $19.40 Electricity, kwh 3,412 $0.15 $43.46 Pellets, ton 16,400,000 $247.00 $18.83 Dividing BTUs per fuel oil gal into BTUs per cord will give approx. 160 gallons oil per cord of wood. Needless to say the price of the stove was recouped in a short period of time, burning 4 cord of wood per year.


Doug
11/12/2014 9:12:39 AM

CaresAboutHealth, your claims are as substantial as wood smoke. A quick search online shows that the Libby wood stove changeout reduced indoor air pollution by 72%. Right from the EPA website. You are full of wood chips on the topic of global warming, which this article was very clear on. Wood heating is the only carbon-neutral option, meaning it is the only one that doesnt contribute to global warming. So who do you work for? The coal industry?







mother-audience

MOTHER EARTH NEWS FAIR

February 15-16, 2020
Belton, Texas

Join us in the Lone Star state to explore ways to save money and live efficiently. This two-day event includes hands-on workshops and a marketplace featuring the latest homesteading products.

LEARN MORE






Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 64% Off the Cover Price

50 Years of Money-Saving Tips!

Mother Earth NewsAt MOTHER EARTH NEWS for 50 years and counting, we are dedicated to conserving our planet's natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. You'll find tips for slashing heating bills, growing fresh, natural produce at home, and more. That's why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.95 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.95 for 6 issues.

Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
International Subscribers - Click Here
Canadian subscriptions: 1 year (includes postage & GST).


Facebook Pinterest Instagram YouTube Twitter flipboard

Free Product Information Classifieds Newsletters

click me