The Modified Arctic Apple: Bad News No Matter How You Slice It

The genetically modified ‘Arctic Apple’ — which is devoid of the compound that turns apples brown and naturally fights off pests — is well on its way to being approved for growing and selling in the U.S.

| May 17, 2013

Thanks to the biotech industry’s relentless quest to control our food, McDonald’s, Burger King and even school cafeterias will soon be able to serve up apples that won’t turn brown when they’re sliced or bitten into. A new, almost entirely untested genetic modification technology, called RNA interference, or double strand RNA (dsRNA), is responsible for this new food miracle. Scientists warn that this genetic manipulation poses health risks, as the manipulated RNA gets into our digestive systems and bloodstreams. The biotech industry claims otherwise.

Of course, like any non-organic apple, the new GMO Arctic® Apple will be drenched in toxic pesticide residues, untested by the U.S. Food & Drug Association (FDA) and likely unlabeled. And of course these shiny new high-tech apples will be cheap, priced considerably lower than a pesticide-free, nutrient-dense, old-fashioned organic apple that turns a little brown after you slice it up.

When the Biotech Industry Organization gathers in Chicago for the 2013 BIO International Convention, BIOTECanada will present its “Gold Leaf Award for Early Stage Agriculture” to Okanagan Specialty Fruits, Inc. (OSF), purveyor of the Arctic® Apple, slated for approval in the U.S. this year. We hate to upset the biotech apple cart, but a pesticide-intensive GMO apple, produced through a risky manipulation of RNA, doesn’t deserve a place on our grocery shelves, much less in the agriculture hall of fame.

That said, the Arctic “Frankenapple” is expected to be approved this year by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), responsible for protecting agriculture from pests and diseases. It does not require approval by the FDA, which is responsible for human food and animal feed.

Just One More Bad Apple

Apples, that is, apples that haven’t been certified organic, already are on the list of Should-Be-Forbidden fruits. They reliably top the Environmental Working Group’s Dirty Dozen list, for both the volume and the stunning array of pesticides consistently found on them. According to the Pesticide Action Network’s analysis of the most recent USDA data, apples tested positive for 42 pesticides, including organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides. Both are endocrine disruptors, both have suspected neurological effects, and both are considered especially toxic for children. (Organophosphates are the basis for nerve gases used in chemical warfare, and have been linked to the development of ADHD in kids.)

Given the grim report card of non-organic apples, some might say it really doesn’t make any difference if we start tinkering with the apple’s genes and RNA. After all, unlike the case with GMO corn or salmon, scientists aren’t injecting pesticides or genes from foreign plants or animals into the genes of apples to create the Frankenapple. While most existing genetically engineered plants are designed to make new proteins, the Arctic Apple is engineered to produce a form of genetic information called double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). The new dsRNA alters the way genes are expressed. The result, in the Arctic Apple’s case, is a new double strand of RNA that genetically “silences” the apple’s ability to produce polyphenol oxidase, an enzyme that causes the apple to turn brown when it’s exposed to oxygen.

1/22/2018 9:21:50 PM

This source is very biased. Here's why: Scientists have maintained the stance that GMOs have no proven links to any health problems - they're no different from regular apples when it comes to a health standpoint. As for the pesticides, normal apples may have many pesticides as well. Pesticides are not related to the GMO, and should not be considered when talking about the GMO. You may petition to stop pesticides from being on apples, but the GMO itself has no harm. I'm not saying the pesticides are not harmful, but they certainly have no role here. You sidetrack near the end of the article, going on to talk about 42 pesticides. Until it is proven by scientists that GMOs are bad for you, I recommend you not to make assumptions. For example, you didn't provide a reliable source for your claim about dsRNA: "Scientists warn that this genetic manipulation poses health risks, as the manipulated RNA gets into our digestive systems and bloodstreams. The biotech industry claims otherwise." Also, you're skewing the results - you said "some scientists agree with the biotech industry", when the VAST MAJORITY of scientists agree with the biotech industry. Also, calling the apple random names doesn't help, either. You can leave those parts out. It's an attack on the apple itself, and is biased from a scientific standpoint. This article should be pure analysis, not opinion. And your sources are cherrypicked - you probably Googled "why gmos are bad for you". You didn't include any counterpoints about why GMO is good. A good, scientific, trustable article always includes some counterclaims so they can refute them with other evidence, which you fail to do throughout this whole article. Instead, you went on Google and sourced three professors you found who happen to agree with you. It's sort of like 10% of people play only soccer, 90% play only basketball, and you pick 3 of the soccer players and say "oh look, 100% of these 3 people play soccer so 100% of the school all play soccer" when in reality, 90% play basketball instead. Next time when you write an article, please be more scientific. Crapping out unscientific articles on a daily basis will turn most people away, except for the vegans and hippies.

mother earth news fair 2018 schedule


Next: April 28-29, 2018
Asheville, NC

Whether you want to learn how to grow and raise your own food, build your own root cellar, or create a green dream home, come out and learn everything you need to know — and then some!


Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 64% Off the Cover Price

Money-Saving Tips in Every Issue!

Mother Earth NewsAt MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet's natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. You'll find tips for slashing heating bills, growing fresh, natural produce at home, and more. That's why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.95 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.95 for 6 issues.

Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
International Subscribers - Click Here
Canadian subscriptions: 1 year (includes postage & GST).

Facebook Pinterest Instagram YouTube Twitter flipboard

Copyright 2018, All Rights Reserved
Ogden Publications, Inc., 1503 SW 42nd St., Topeka, Kansas 66609-1265