The Great Fruitcake Debate

Reader Contribution by Sue Van Slooten
Published on December 15, 2017
article image

Yes, I am going to wade into the Great Fruitcake Debate. People seem to love it or hate it, and not much in between. A lot of the hate it group, though, have not tried it, it’s the “idea” of the fruitcake that turns them o?. In their eyes, it’s a brick, made of dense, sticky fruit, no ?avour, and overly sweet. Even the prospect of rum or brandy doesn’t entice.

The other side of the argument is the opposite of course, where people see fruity yumminess, with spices, sometimes nuts, and yes, the aforementioned rum or brandy. You cannot have a more divisive subject. Being a baker, I suspect you all know which side I will fall on: In support of fruitcakes. Ok, now that I am outed as a fruitcake lover, I do agree that some of the “items” passing as fruitcake in the commercial world are not only disappointing, but, well, yuck. 

This is where home baking comes to the rescue. Once again, if made by you, you get to choose what goes in your cake, the ?avour will be authentic, no need for density or gumminess. 

But ?rst, I must add an historical note for fruitcakes’ enduring legacy: It has been around for centuries (and no doubt some of you think the originals are still here, carefully (or not) preserved, for God knows what) If one entertains the idea that fruitcake was one of the original granola bars if you will, and they can teach us much about longevity, just look at the 106 year old one found in Antarctica [1]. It’s probably edible, no one is really saying.The cakes went on the trip because they were high in fat and sugar, good for when you are trekking across the Southern Continent and need a 4000 per day calorie intake.The report did not mention much about whether they were brandy soaked or not. I think more detail is needed here.

Comments (0) Join others in the discussion!
    Online Store Logo
    Need Help? Call 1-800-234-3368