From the editors of Fine Woodworking magazine, Best Finishing Techniques (Taunton Press, 2011) is a firsthand report of various experiments and studies done by skilled woodworkers to answer your questions about the best way to finish up a project in your woodshop. The book covers sandpaper selection and how to sand wood, coloring and applying finishes to your products, and even finish recipes. The following excerpt is taken from Part Two, “Surface Preparation and Sanding: When to Stop Sanding.”
Sanding is most woodworkers’ least-favorite activity. It’s dusty, boring, and time-consuming — the sooner done, the better. But what is the right stopping point? When does moving to a finer grit no longer yield appreciable improvements in the finished surface? To find out, I did a semi-scientific study. I took boards of cherry, white oak and tiger maple as test woods, not only because they are familiar furniture woods but also to see if tight or open grain and figure would influence the best final grit. I cut each into six pieces and sanded them to six different grits. I then divided each piece into thirds and applied a different finish to each section because what really matters is not how the bare boards look but their appearance with a finish. The results were both interesting and reassuring.
I chose aluminum-oxide sandpaper graded to the FEPA scale (recognizable by the P prefix to the number) because it is the standard abrasive for sanding bare wood. I tested P120, P150, P220, P320, P400, and P600 grits because most of the sanding I had previously done was with either P220 grit or P320 grit. I wanted to see if coarser or finer grits would make a noticeable change in the finished appearance of the wood. Would the open-grained pattern on white oak conceal the scratches left by coarser grits? Would cherry, a blotch-prone wood, respond best to finer-grit sanding? Would the stripes of tiger maple be enhanced by a coarse final grit, or would they be left blotchy?
I used a random-orbit sander for the majority of the sanding, progressing through the grits. This was followed by hand-sanding with a sanding block, with the grain, at the same final grit. I changed the disks when they began to wear out, but I used fresh paper on each board’s final grit for both the random-orbit and the hand-sanding. I chose these three woods to see if wood grain or figure would make any difference. I cut one long board of each species into six 171⁄2-in. by 8-in. sections and machine-planed them flat. Once the 18 sections were sanded to the appropriate final grit, I removed the dust using a clean paintbrush and a vacuum.
After sanding, I used masking tape to separate each board into three sections. This allowed me to apply three different finishes to see if some are more sensitive to the final grit than others. I chose Danish oil for a minimal-build, in-the-wood finish; shellac rubbed out with steel wool and then waxed for a medium-luster, thin-film finish; and an oil-based polyurethane to give a more protective, high-gloss finish.
I used natural Watco Danish oil, wiping on the first coat with a cotton cloth, then wiping off the surplus. When dry, I applied a second coat and wet-sanded using P400-grit wet/dry sandpaper and a sanding block. Then I wiped it dry to remove the surplus sawdust and oil. The next day, I applied a final coat in the same way as the first.
On the next section, I rubbed on Zinsser SealCoat shellac with a cotton cloth. I applied eight coats over two days, sanded lightly with P320-grit sandpaper on a sanding block, and then added two more coats. When dry, I rubbed the surface with 0000 steel wool and applied a thin coat of paste wax, polishing with a cotton cloth.
I brushed three coats of Zar® oil-based, high-gloss, interior polyurethane on the final section, sanding between coats with P320-grit paper. The third coat was left untouched.
Each sample board was sanded and had three finishes applied. The difference, or lack thereof, between the highest and lowest sanded grits is depicted in the photos visible when you click to see the Wood Sanding Results PDF.
White Oak. The oak boards showed the least difference over the range of grits. Under the shellac and polyurethane finishes, all six boards were identical. The Danish-oiled panels were slightly lower in luster with the coarsest two grades of grit than with the finest two grits.
Cherry. There was a slightly lower luster on the oil-finished P120-grit board compared with the P400- and P600-grit boards. I had expected to see some blotchy cherry, but the sample board behaved fairly well. However, based on previous experience, I would still sand cherry up to at least P400 grit if I were going to use and oil finish.
Tiger Maple. The coarser grits were expected to leave the stripes more porous, resulting in more finish penetration and more pronounce figure. Instead, the degree of figure was equal on the extremes of grit with all three finishes. As with the other woods, higher grits brought out a higher luster under an oil finish.
This test set out to answer the question of how much sanding is too much. Based on these results, I can feel confident putting the sandpaper down after using P150 grit if I’m using a film finish, P220 grit for an oil finish on nonblotchy wood, and probably P400 grit on blotch-prone boards.
I used clear finishes only. If you regularly stain your wood, you may want to do your own test. In general, wood sanded with higher grits tends to absorb less stain than wood sanded to a coarser grit. I also didn’t test softwoods or hard tropical woods, but most furniture woods fall in the hardness range of my three test species.
You also should sand correctly, even if you stop at a lower grit. When using the coarsest grit, make sure to remove all the telltale ripple marks left by the jointer and the planer. After power-sanding at final grit, make sure that you remove any swirls left by the random-orbit sander by thoroughly hand-sanding with the grain.
I am thrilled by the results; as a weekend warrior, I already spend too little time in the shop. I have better things to do with that time than listen to my sander.
This excerpt is reprinted with permission from Best Finishing Techniques, published by Taunton Press, 2011.
Whether you want to learn how to grow and raise your own food, build your own root cellar, or create a green dream home, come out and learn everything you need to know — and then some!LEARN MORE
At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet's natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. You'll find tips for slashing heating bills, growing fresh, natural produce at home, and more. That's why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.95 (USA only).
You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.95 for 6 issues.