DIY

Removing Toxic Lead Fumes Safely When Soldering Stained Glass

article image
PHOTO: FOTOLIA/KIRILART
Working with stained glass, you see, exposes us to toxic lead vapors given off in the joint-soldering process, as well as fumes from flux.

Geoffrey and Barbara Proust explain their method of removing toxic lead fumes safely from their workshop when joint-soldering stained glass pieces.

My wife, Barbara, and I operate a stained-glass business
out of our home studio . . . and although we both enjoy
combining the independence of self-employment with the
creativity of artistic endeavor, our craft does present us
with a special problem.

Working with stained glass, you see, exposes us to toxic
lead vapors given off in the joint-soldering process, as
well as fumes from flux. Lead is an especially nocuous
poison because it accumulates in the body with each
exposure and can eventually result in anemia, kidney
dysfunction, and even permanent brain damage.

Clearly, a solution was required when removing toxic lead fumes safely. It was obvious that
simply forcing air across the workbench and into another
part of the studio wasn’t the answer, nor was relying upon
a household window fan to do a major ventilation job. But
the variable-position exhaust system I made (using a
swing-arm incandescent desk lamp, a plastic bucket, some
ducting, and a blower) provides positive suction and
removal of the offending vapors at any point within a
6′-diameter circle on our table . . . at a cost (less than
$45) that even a hobbyist could justify.

The system I devised consists of two components: the
suction apparatus and the movable support arm for the
suction head. The latter is just a swiveling all-position
arm lamp of the kind frequently used for drafting and
design work. To convert it, I drilled out the rivets that
held the shade to its mount, removed the electrical parts
(by clipping the plug and drawing the wire through the
arms), and fastened a 7 inch-diameter plastic ice cream bucket
in place of the shade, using No. 6 by 1/2 inch machine screws. A
4 inch opening cut into the bottom of the bucket accommodates
the flexible suction tube.

The air-handling apparatus is almost as straightforward.
Once I’d established where I wanted to bolt my support arm
(a table-edge mount allows a 180 degree sweep, while a
centrally located base provides a full 360 degree reach), I
hung enough 6 inch round galvanized ducting overhead to reach
from the nearest outside wall to a point above the arm.
Then I attached about 7 feet of 4 inch flexible clothes-dryer
hose to the hole in the plastic suction head and used a
4 inch-to-6 inch adapter to connect the hose’s opposite end to the
duct.

My exhaust fan is a used 2.9-amp squirrel cage blower with
a free-air delivery rate of 350 cubic feet per minute
(Dayton No. 2C841). Centrifugal fans are usually designed
to blow, rather than draw, air, but I installed a 6 inch-duct
adapter plate to its inlet anyway. By using the oversized
duct, keeping its length and the number of elbows in it to
a minimum, and cracking open a window to allow vented air
to be replaced, I figure I’ve made an acceptable compromise
between efficiency and cost. (One particular fan that’s
made just for ducted systems–the Dayton
1C791–costs over $100.) To install it, I cut an
opening in the exterior wall, mounted the blower, and used
a wall cap on the outside to cover and protect the exhaust
outlet.

Naturally, my ventilation system would work with fumes,
vapors, smoke, or anything without sizable particulate
matter in it. But if the substance you’re venting is
flammable, be certain that the fan you choose is a
non-sparking “explosion-proof” type, even though it’ll cost
more; by the same token, dusty substances will demand a
sealed motor with greater power.