This article originally appeared on Streetsblog and was reposted with permission from Angie Schmitt.
Pittsburgh was the newest city to announce its bike-share plans this week, when it confirmed the city would add a 500-bike system by the spring of next year.
But nearby Columbus, Ohio, will beat them to the punch. Ohio’s capital city is planning to add 300 bikes this summer. Meanwhile, Indianapolis’ plan was to roll out its system next month.
The truth is you would be hard-pressed to find a large Midwestern city that hasn’t taken formal steps toward adding a bike-share system.
Both Cleveland and Detroit are studying bike-share programs. Cincinnati completed a bike-share study late last year, and is now seeking proposals from contractors. Milwaukee is assembling money for a system. Chicago hopes to add 3,000 bikes this spring.
And of course there’s the granddaddy of them all: Minneapolis’ Nice Ride. Launched in 2010, this system currently boasts more than 1,200 bikes. Late last year, the system surpassed half a million trips.
Midwestern cities have been inspired by some of the more spectacular examples on the coasts, according to Eric Rogers, executive director of BikeWalkKC, the nonprofit organization that manages Kansas City’s bike-share system. Kansas City was a little ahead of the pack when it launched Kansas City B-Cycle, with 200 bikes at 12 stations, last summer.
“The last few years a lot of cities, especially in the Midwest, have seen good examples from places like Chicago and Portland and New York and D.C. of a lot of innovative facilities that are out there: cycle tracks, bike boxes, bike sharing,” he said. “There’s so much more knowledge out there now that it’s easier to develop a solution and pursue it.”
Midwestern metros have also been lured by the availability of new technology and the assistance of companies like B-Cycle and Alta Bikes that make installing these systems relatively easy and affordable. But these new additions to the bike-share family have taken a markedly different approach than some large coastal cities.
Midwestern systems tend to be smaller and more conservative than those in major metros outside the region.
“A lot of the Midwest cities started kind of small, maybe with 10 or 12 stations, and they’re growing more organically over time,” Rogers said. “It seems like a lot of the larger coastal cities have taken more of a big-bang approach.”
Washington, D.C.’s first SmartBike system failed precisely because of its small size. The city decided that a bike-share system needed to be big enough to be useful right from the get-go, and the phenomenal success of Capital Bikeshare has proven that they were on to something.
Meanwhile, Kansas City’s start-small approach seems to be going as planned. BikeWalkKC got some additional federal air quality money to expand its system with eight stations this year, which will bring the citywide total to 20.
Rogers says operating a successful system in the Midwest comes with its own challenges. Midwestern cities typically aren’t as densely populated as some larger coastal metros. They may also lack transit that facilitates bicycling, and especially bike sharing.
“There’s some pretty clear data that shows there’s more [bike-share] usage in a denser city,” he said.
Kansas City was surprised, for example, to see far more leisure-time trips than commuting trips. Evenings, lunchtimes and weekends are the most popular times for bike rentals there. Special downtown events also lead to a spike in usage. The organization has tailored its marketing toward this crowd, Rogers said.
One big question that remains is whether Midwestern systems will ever be financially self-supporting, as Washington D.C.’s Capital Bikeshare is becoming. The other question is whether that really matters.
Photo By Fotolia/Lamplightersdv
