Nature and Environment

Because at 160,000 years, the party is just getting started.

Add to My MSN

Republication of Seralini Study Exposes Roundup

7/3/2014 4:37:00 PM

Tags: herbicide, chemical agriculture, Monsanto, environmental health

maize

GMOSeralini.org welcomes the news of the republication of the chronic toxicity study on the glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup and a commercialized genetically modified (GM) maize, Monsanto’s NK603, led by Prof Gilles-Eric Séralini. The republication restores the study to the peer-reviewed literature so that it can be consulted and built upon by other scientists.

The study found severe liver and kidney damage and hormonal disturbances in rats fed the GM maize and low levels of Roundup that are below those permitted in drinking water in the EU. Toxic effects were found from the GM maize tested alone, as well as from Roundup tested alone and together with the maize. Additional unexpected findings were higher rates of large tumours and mortality in most treatment groups.

The study was first published in Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT) in September 2012 but was retracted by the editor-in-chief in November 2013 after a sustained campaign of criticism and defamation by pro-GMO scientists.

Now the study has been republished by Environmental Sciences Europe. The republished version contains extra material addressing criticisms of the original publication. The raw data underlying the study’s findings are also published – unlike the raw data for the industry studies that underlie regulatory approvals of Roundup, which are kept secret. However, the new paper presents the same results as before and the conclusions are unchanged.

The republished study is accompanied by a separate commentary by Prof Séralini’s team describing the lobbying efforts of GMO crop supporters to force the editor of FCT to retract the original publication.

GMOSeralini.org editor Claire Robinson commented: “This study has now successfully passed no less than three rounds of rigorous peer review.

“The first was for the initial publication of the study in Food and Chemical Toxicology. It passed with only minor revisions, according to the authors.

“The second review took months. It involved a non-transparent examination of Prof Séralini’s raw data by a secret panel of unnamed persons organized by the editor-in-chief of FCT, A. Wallace Hayes, in response to criticisms of the study by pro-GMO scientists.

“In a letter to Prof Séralini, Hayes admitted that the anonymous reviewers found nothing ‘incorrect’ about the results presented. However, Hayes pointed to what he said was the ‘inconclusive’ nature of some aspects of the paper, namely the tumour and mortality observations, to justify his decision to retract the study.

“The rationale given for the retraction was widely criticized by scientists as an act of censorship and a bow to the interests of the GMO industry. Some scientists pointed out that numerous published scientific papers contain inconclusive findings, including Monsanto’s own short (90-day) study on the same GM maize, and have not been retracted. The retraction was even condemned by a former member of the editorial board of FCT.

“Now the study has passed a third peer review arranged by the journal that is republishing the study, Environmental Sciences Europe.

Comments From Scientists

Dr Michael Antoniou, a molecular geneticist based in London, commented, “Few studies would survive such intensive scrutiny by fellow scientists. The republication of the study after three expert reviews is a testament to its rigour, as well as to the integrity of the researchers.

“If anyone still doubts the quality of this study, they should simply read the republished paper. The science speaks for itself.

“If even then they refuse to accept the results, they should launch their own research study on these two toxic products that have now been in the human food and animal feed chain for many years.”

Dr Jack A Heinemann, Professor of Molecular Biology and Genetics, University of Canterbury New Zealand, called the republication “an important demonstration of the resilience of the scientific community”. Dr Heinemann continued, “The first publication of these results revealed some of the viciousness that can be unleashed on researchers presenting uncomfortable findings. I applaud Environmental Sciences Europe for submitting the work to yet another round of rigorous blind peer review and then bravely standing by the process and the recommendations of its reviewers, especially after witnessing the events surrounding the first publication.

“This study has arguably prevailed through the most comprehensive and independent review process to which any scientific study on GMOs has ever been subjected.

The work provides important new knowledge that must be taken into account by the community that evaluates and reports upon the risks of genetically modified organisms, indeed upon all sources of pesticide in our food and feed chains. In time these findings must be verified by repetition or challenged by superior experimentation. In my view, nothing constructive for risk assessment or promotion of GM biotechnology has been achieved by attempting to expunge these data from the public record.

Photo courtesy Fotolia/EcoView



Related Content

Chasing the Truth: Is Roundup Herbicide Making Minerals in Our Food Less Available to Us?

Plant pathologist Dr. Don Huber brings attention to concerns surrounding Monsanto’s Roundup herbicid...

Does Invasive Always Equal Evil?

Taking a new look at non-native invasives, such as wild yams.

Roundup Weed Killer Kills More Than Weeds

Alarming new research on the health hazards of Roundup weed killer is shining a harsh light on a reg...

Possible Connection Between Roundup and Colony Collapse Disorder

It turns out that weeds may not be the only thing Roundup is killing; Colony Collapse Disorder could...

Content Tools




Post a comment below.

 

schlfarm
7/22/2014 1:06:00 PM
LENG I don't know who you are. But, I can absolutely say that you have blind hate issues. That is the most irrational thing I have heard in a long time. The corporations that are doing this sick thing have nothing to do with Jews or Zionism. It is pure capitalism.... the republican way. Why would a religion poison people. Do you think all Jews eat only organic food? Really? See a psychiatrist please before you hurt yourself or someone you can actually care for.

LENG
7/14/2014 3:42:16 PM
Just another example of the Zionist promotion of death to Americans. No other country allows this. Monsanto has also been found to have ties with a genetics lab in Tel Aviv which has been creating new strains of biological weapons that specifically target Arab genes. Almost 80% of the foods on the grocery shelves are kosher: safe for the jews to eat. If Monsantos ties are deeper, who is to say that their foods aren't already targeting other gene pools here? Their tomatoes caused stomach and liver cancer. They fixed that little problem and now the signs are much more subtle. Never buy kosher and boycott kosher slaughter.

ROBERTE
7/14/2014 8:33:43 AM
The only problem with this report is that it is a European Study published in Europe. Our DOA and FDA choose to ignore anything published off shore regardless of their value. I guess that they only consider documentation in American English when attached to a green slip of negotiable paper.

fady
7/4/2014 2:10:34 PM
http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/92.html/ http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/88.html/ http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/320.html/ http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/110.html/ http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/125.html/ http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/10.html http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/109.html http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/318.html/ http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/119.html http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/321.html http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/category10 http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/category11 http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/category7 http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/category11 http://www.al3abbanatcool.com/category12 http://www.la3baonline.com/cars-game/ http://www.flashgames1234.com










Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.