Micro Solar Energy From 'Glitter PV'

Sandia National Laboratories scientists have developed tiny, glitter-sized photovoltaic cells that could revolutionize the way solar energy is collected and used.

| 12/27/2012

micro pv2

 Crystalline-silicon micro-photovoltaic cells measure from 14 to 20 micrometers thick and 0.25 to 1 millimeter across, offering a diverse array of potential uses. 

Photo by Murat Okandan

The following news release was provided Dec. 21, 2009, by Sandia National Laboratories. 

Scientists at Sandia National Laboratories’ tiny solar PV cells could turn a person into a walking solar battery charger if the cells were fastened to flexible substrates molded around unusual shapes, such as clothing.

The solar particles, fabricated of crystalline silicon, hold the potential for a variety of new applications. They are expected eventually to be less expensive and have greater efficiencies than current photovoltaic collectors that are pieced together with 6-inch- square solar wafers.

The cells are fabricated using micro-electronic and micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) techniques common to today’s electronic foundries. Sandia lead investigator Greg Nielson said the research team has identified more than 20 benefits of scale for its micro-photovoltaic cells. These include new applications, improved performance, potential for reduced costs and higher efficiencies.

Glitter PV Functionality

“Eventually units could be mass-produced and wrapped around unusual shapes for building-integrated solar, tents and maybe even clothing,” he said. This would make it possible for hunters, hikers or military personnel in the field to recharge batteries for phones, cameras and other electronic devices as they walk or rest. Even better, such micro-engineered panels could have circuits imprinted that would help perform other functions customarily left to large-scale construction with its attendant need for field construction design and permits.

Sandia field engineer Vipin Gupta said, “Photovoltaic modules made from these micro-sized cells for the rooftops of homes and warehouses could have intelligent controls, inverters and even storage built in at the chip level. Such an integrated module could greatly simplify the cumbersome design, bid, permit and grid integration process that our solar technical assistance teams see in the field all the time.”

t brandt
1/6/2013 12:00:52 PM

good points Mc--..I've been following the prices of wind/Pv energy for 45 yrs now. It has always cost considerably more to use them than conventional grid electricity. Those alternatives only make economic sense when their application is for a site way, way off grid, when the cost of running new lines over a great distance is prohibitive, or for less remote applications on your property where demand is very low & occasional- as in a water pump, as you mentioned, or shed lites, etc. In figuring the economic costs, it's frequently forgotten that spending calital up front means you lose the investment potential of that capital. That at least doubles the real cost of the system.....The whole concept of "saving the planet" is based on the false premise that fossil fuels are hurting the environment: That is simply not true. The "GW" concept is fraudulent with exactly zero scientific evidence to back it up. It's only supported by computer models programmed to give the results favoring the supposed need to redistribute wealth & political power.

m mcwilliams
1/5/2013 4:52:46 AM

I am not as familiar with wind turbines but I see way too much expense and not nearly as much return. The turbines are/have to be HUGE, are expensive and noisy. They are also less dependable than even solar. Several of the big wind farms have already shut down because of the problems...also they seem to catch on fire easily??? I would absolutely do lots more reading before I put money into wind. They do make a good small turbine for keeping water circulating as in a pond or to run a water pump. Just wouldn't want to have to rely on it.

matt harrell
1/4/2013 6:26:02 PM

I agree with you there. I would much rather have self-sufficiency via solar and wind for the cost savings than for the "big picture." Considering that with only a 1300 sq ft home I currently spend $1600/year for electricity, I could pay off a net-zero system in short order. I just need the up front cost to go down a bit more.

m mcwilliams
1/4/2013 4:44:23 PM

If the government would stay out of picking and choosing in this industry things would be a lot better these days. I like this new technology...just get the government to stay out of it. In 2008 (we are installers) we were averaging 4 systems a year, not great but growing. Since then with all the pressure and interference we are installing the first system since! This is a technology that was growing slowly but steadily. People were educating themselves and making good choices. You may not believe this but out of the 14 systems we sold...only on couple professed to be doing it "to save the world". The others were all professed to be Conservatives who wanted solar to be more independent and to save money...in my mind this is a smarter and more logical reason. "Saving the world" is icing on the cake. I think solar is a great thing but it needs to be done on a gradual small scale using current construction where possible and new construction that can be sited as needed. To try to do arrays that will run a whole city will not work...IMHO.

mother earth news fair


Oct. 21-22, 2017
Topeka, KS.

More than 150 workshops, great deals from more than 200 exhibitors, off-stage demos, inspirational keynotes, and great food!