In order to put some meat on these fine sounding statements, we offer you a simple formula for calculating the payback of an energy conservation investment. There are, of course, more sophisticatedâ€”and meaningfulâ€”ways to make financial judgments, but the following approach will give you a general idea of whether a particular conservation step is economical.

In the following savings and payback formula, we've used some symbols to keep the equations from appearing too cluttered. Here's what they mean:

**RN:**Â *New R-value,* the new R-value of the area after it's improved

**DD:**Â *Degree-Days,* the heating degree-days at your location (check a solar energy book or call your local weather service to find this out)

**SE:**Â *Saved Energy,* in units of 1,000 Btu per square foot per year (kBtu/square ft./yr.)

**A:**Â *Area,* total area of the retrofit in square feet

**CE:**Â *Cost of Energy,* your energy cost per 1,000 Btu in dollars (see the energy cost chart in the Image Gallery)

**SY:**Â *Savings per Year,* the amount of money the improvement will save you each year in energy costs

**CI:**Â *Cost of Improvement,* total amount spent on the improvement

**P:**Â *Payback,* the payback period in years

Ready? First you calculate SE, the annual energy savings per square foot of the retrofit improvement:

**SE** = (1/RO-1/RN) X DD X 24/1,000

Multiply that product by the area of the improvement and by the cost of energy to get the total annual savings, like this:

**SY** = SE X A X CE

Now, it's a cinch to work out the payback:

**P** = CI/SY

Let's look at a few examples. For starters, let's determine the payback for upgrading 1,000 square feet of wall from no insulation (R-3) to R-11. Our sample house is located in Asheville, North Carolinaâ€”which has 4,200 heating degree-daysâ€”and at present the owner pays $1.25 per gallon for fuel oil to heat the building. The per-square-foot cost of the blow-in insulation is about 20 cents, including the fee for renting the blower, and the owner supplies the labor. (This job might sound intimidating, but it's really not difficult.)

**Annual Energy Savings** Â

**SE** = (1/3-1/11) X 4,200 X 24/1,000Â = 24.44 kBtu/square ft./yr.

**Annual Money Savings** Â

**SY** = 24.44 X 1,000 X .015 = $366.60

**Payback** Â

**P** = $200/$366.60 = 0.55 yr.

In other words, that $200 investment will pay for itself in just over half a year. From then on, it will earn you $366.60 extra income annually! Beat that, stock market!

Now, let's see what would happen if that Asheville house already had blown-in insulation and you were thinking about upgrading that R-11 to R-19 by removing the siding, adding rigid board insulation, and replacing the siding. The cost of this owner-installed retrofit would be about 35 cents per square foot for materials.

**Annual Energy Savings** Â

**SE** = (1/11-1/19) X 4,200 X 24/1,000 = 3.86 kBtu/square ft./yr.

**Annual Money Savings** Â

**SY** = 3.86 X 1,000 X .015 = $57.90

**Payback** Â

**P** = $350/$57.90 = 6.0 yr.

This time it's going to take six years to earn that $350 back. From then on, you'll be saving an extra $57.90 per year. While not as all-out glorious as the first investment, that's still nothing to sneeze at. (What else pays 16.5% interest in the first year?)

Lest you assume that *every* investment in energy efficiency is a great one, let's look at one more possibility. Using the last example as a basis, let's calculate the payback if the owner decides to pay someone *else* to install that rigid board insulation. Removing siding and then furring out the walls is fairly laborious. It might add another 55 cents per square foot to the price of the job, bringing the cost up to 90 cents/square ft. ... or a total of $900.

Well, the annual energy and money savings will be the same as they were above, but look what that total cost of the improvement does to the payback:

P = $900/$57.90 = 15.5 yr.

Whoops! Now, it's going to be *15 1/2 years* before you earn your money back. Not so good, eh? (Well, it could be worse. Your investment will be earning interest at a 5.7% rate that first year ... and increasing the resale value of your house.)

The difference, of course, between the first two shining examples and the last, more mundane one is labor. To make typical energy saving at home really pay off, you have to do it yourself.

But that's what this magazine's all about, isn't it?