National Uniformity for Food Act Would Undermine Our Best Food Safety Standards

| July/August 2006

Have you heard about the 'National Uniformity for Food Act' yet? If passed, this controversial bill will undermine approximately 200 state food safety and food labeling laws, and prohibit state and local governments from setting food safety standards higher than those established by the federal government.

Currently, states have chosen to set higher standards in numerous areas. For instance, local state governments maintain regulations that ensure food served in restaurants, schools and nursing homes is safe to eat. (The federal FDA has no requirements for the safety of food served in such establishments.) According to Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), 'This bill would eliminate virtually every state and local law that provides greater protection than our federal food laws.'

Alaska labels all its genetically modified fish. New York and Rhode Island limit toxic materials in food packaging. Illinois regulates egg processing to reduce contamination. California has set a maximum for lead and alcohol content in candy, requires the labeling of ingredients that are known to be carcinogens and prohibits the use of certain dietary supplements by high school athletes. Sixteen states assure that shellfish is not contaminated. Maine requires that food producers disclose the use of post-harvest pesticides. Numerous states regulate potentially harmful food additives. Maryland requires a label if 'fresh' food was previously frozen, and Delaware requires one if carbonated beverages contain artificial sweeteners.

By enacting legislation that makes food laws all conform to one federal model, all these progressive policies will be made illegal. Supporters of the bill include food giants such as HJ Heinz Co., Kraft Foods, Sara Lee Corp., Nestle USA and many supermarket chains.

This legislation has already passed the House (H.R. 4167), but it's not too late to do something about it! The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee is considering the National Uniformity for Food Act (S. 3128) this week.

1/26/2011 2:11:01 PM

I think that neither nationalization nor globalization are good ideas. I think that the local community should be deciding the food safety laws. Mind you I don't write for the Mother Earth News, but still. I'm not much for imperialism in general, and that definitely includes standards set for what people eat.

TERRY Gray_2
7/26/2006 12:00:00 AM

Amazing. You folks promote globalization in almost every issue yet you backoff from nationalization. Do you think that globalization begins globally?What kind of standards would be set if everything was global, who would set them, and how would we fight the ones with which we disagree? National uniformity is just a step in your precious globalization. Be careful what you wish for.

mother earth news fair 2018 schedule


Next: August 4-5, 2018
Albany, OR

Whether you want to learn how to grow and raise your own food, build your own root cellar, or create a green dream home, come out and learn everything you need to know — and then some!


Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 64% Off the Cover Price

Money-Saving Tips in Every Issue!

Mother Earth NewsAt MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet's natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. You'll find tips for slashing heating bills, growing fresh, natural produce at home, and more. That's why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.95 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.95 for 6 issues.

Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
International Subscribers - Click Here
Canadian subscriptions: 1 year (includes postage & GST).

Facebook Pinterest Instagram YouTube Twitter flipboard