Abundance


| 8/7/2012 9:25:22 AM


Tags: Beautiful and Abundant, Challenges, Abundance, Bryan Welch,

 

I have been privileged to visit most of the planet’s ecosystems: from subtropical deserts to the floor of the ocean; from the grasslands to the tropical rain forest, the temperate rain forest, the temperate deciduous forest, the alpine tundra and the northern boreal forest called the taiga. Each and every one of them was beautiful. I haven’t yet seen the arctic tundra or a polar ice cap in person, but I’m certain they are beautiful and I hope I get the chance. 

Every natural environment is beautiful in ways we cannot imagine. We must preserve natural beauty for precisely that reason, because we could not conceive of natural beauty on our own without nature’s inspiration. 

People who design modern zoos use a criterion they call “flight distance.” Most animals have a prescribed distance they would run, if frightened, before they turned to look back. If a zoo enclosure is built at least a little larger than the animal’s flight distance, zoo creatures are calmer and healthier. If designers don’t allow for flight distance, the animals are neurotic, combative and less healthy. 

Besides beauty, wilderness also provides us with the psychological flight distance. As long as there are empty places on the planet, our minds can flee to those empty places when they have the need. 

Rainbow photo by Bryan WelchSo in my vision, every unique ecosystem across the globe would be preserved in its natural state. Perhaps we could reserve at least 20 percent of each nation’s landmass for wilderness, allocated to each biome, each ecosystem. In the United States 20 percent of our grasslands, 20 percent of our forests, 20 percent of our swamps and at least 20 percent of our deserts would be permanently preserved as God created them, open to visitors but not vehicles. Whatever natural resources they contain would remain unexploited, by popular consent, forever, as a testament of our commitment to beauty, and to abundance. 

bryan welch
1/3/2013 1:18:08 PM

It's true that we can't restore ecosystems to pre-human or even pre-industrial purity, but we can preserve them as healthy systems.


bryan welch
1/3/2013 1:17:06 PM

Agreed, Deb.


deb rankin
10/22/2012 1:59:29 PM

Byran, the exploding world population must be become a top priority for all countries; this planet cannot sustain billions more people without encurring massive food and water shortages. Look back through history and you will find many conflicts, including all out wars, have been based on the acquiring arable land and water resources. As the population continues to grow and the supply of food and water become more scarce, I think we will see more conflict world-wide, not to mention death from starvation. I agree much of our planet's wonderful resources and future generations of our species could be ensured if people who just take responsibility and control the birth rate.


alex mckenzie
10/22/2012 1:54:53 PM

"In the United States 20 percent of our grasslands, 20 percent of our forests, 20 percent of our swamps and at least 20 percent of our deserts would be permanently preserved as God created them..." Assuming there is a creator who generated each ecosystem at some point in the past, it's too late to preserve them as they were. Humans have altered ecosystems for tens of thousands of years. I agree that we need to preserve open space. I agree that we need to preserve at least a sample of each ecosystem type in a relatively natural state. But the simple fact is, we can't do that any more. We've thrown things too far out of balance. Local climates are changing, animal and bird populations are shifting, local ecologies are being thrown out of balance by foreign species. How do you want to preserve the state of the Great Plains? As they are now? As they were 100 years ago? 200? 10,000? If that last is the case, you'd better order an industrial strength icemaker, and put in a call to someone to clone you up a bunch of mammoths... We need natural spaces. We need wild spaces. But we also need to decide how to manage them so that they can stay self-sufficient.


chris l
8/27/2012 1:37:01 AM

Bryan, I agree that we are blessed with great abundance on Earth and love your idea of reserving 20% of each landmass or ecosystem. But I also think we have a large problem of unnecessary wastefulness of our adundance, especially in regards to food production. I discuss this topic on my blog which your readers may also enjoy: http://everything-can-be-challenged.blogspot.com/2012/08/wasting-abundance.html





mother earth news fair

MOTHER EARTH NEWS FAIR

Oct. 21-22, 2017
Topeka, KS.

More than 150 workshops, great deals from more than 200 exhibitors, off-stage demos, inspirational keynotes, and great food!

LEARN MORE