Unlabeled GMO Sugars in Common Foods

| 10/31/2008 10:49:46 AM

Tags: GMOs, Monsanto, sugars, FDA,



The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a long tradition of  neglecting to determine the safety of genetically modified (GM) foods, and it appears that tradition is holding strong. According to GM Sugar Beet: Trick or Treat? from Grist, GM beet sugar may begin appearing in the food supply as early as 2009 — combined with non-GM sugar and sold as "sugar" — and without any labeling to indicate that the final products contain any GM ingredients.

According to Grist, "Manufacturers of candy, cereal, granola bars, baby food, breads — anything that contains sugar — would be hard-pressed to avoid using sugar derived from GM beet sugar once it's introduced into the market. This "no label" policy eliminates food producers' right to know, choose, or refuse to use non-GM sugar in its products. It also keeps consumers in the dark."

While Monsanto's Roundup-Ready sugar beets are being increasingly used as food shortages create a demand for higher yielding crops (Read more about the Millions Against Monsanto at the Organic Consumer Association Web site.), there is some hope for satisfying your sweet tooth without sampling engineered treats. Simply stick to candies that are made with sugar cane, cane juice or certified organic sugar to make sure you're getting the real deal. 


michele bline
11/11/2008 11:54:00 PM

I am severely aggrivated about the whole GMO thing. I grow vegetables for farmers markets and I am amazed at how many farmers grow Roundup Ready sweet corn. We definitely need a manditory genetic labeling law. What about the million things derrived from corn that appear in all our food. Or the oils we cook with, or the meat we eat that are fed that stuff.

11/11/2008 9:35:52 AM

The USDA and the FDA should demand labeling GE foods, as consumers we have the right to know. But we also have the power to buy certified organic products only.

11/10/2008 3:18:33 PM

Whether for or against GMOs, labeling which gives consumers knowledge of what they are buying and consuming is _essential_ and only decency and common sense. It's an -outrage- that there will be no labeling! Many foods today have ingredients in them that are debated as safe or not, including GMOs. BUT, at least those ingredients are labeled so buyers can look and see what is in the food. This is a DANGER to the public's rights of knowledge when no labeling is provide, and feels truly subversive and insidious. Anyone who feels like taking action, notify those in authority (quick e-mail, even) how you feel about the issue of -no labeling-, which is the true violation.

linda holler
11/10/2008 12:03:09 PM

Who cares about the GMO sugar. What about the artificial color in everything? My daughter (age 21) has developed a dangerous allergy to Red 40. She gets sharp pain in her face and neck and her arms go numb. Artificial color is 100% unnecessary, but nothing is done about the numerous complaints.

11/9/2008 2:41:03 PM

This is where we are in America today! Corporations who have no regard for the rights of the average person,like a right to choose what we eat, making the rules.Monsanto has been doing this type thing for a century,lying cheating,killing and dirty dealing;all to make a buck. Usda/FDA are accomplices to this rotten behavior,now they want National Animal ID to protect us but they wont do their job and protect us from the very corporations that push for this garbage,we have to start fighting back as a people demanding the govt quit propping up and siding with business and get our Bill of Rights back into common use,business is a good thing but NOT when it trumps the rights of the people and this republic,enough already!

mother earth news fair


Oct. 21-22, 2017
Topeka, KS.

More than 150 workshops, great deals from more than 200 exhibitors, off-stage demos, inspirational keynotes, and great food!