Real Environmentalists Eat White Chicken Eggs

| 9/17/2009 11:49:02 AM

I’ve been telling people for quite a while: Real environmentalists eat white chicken eggs. That’s because white-egg layers are almost always more feed efficient: Hens that lay white eggs are lighter weight and eat less feed to produce the same amount of eggs as brown-egg layers. So, brown chicken eggs require more resources to produce.

Here’s an Example

Hy-Line is a large poultry genetics corporation. Their website says that Hy-Line W-36 hens (the “world’s most efficient egg layer,” according to the site) consume 1.82 pounds of feed to produce a pound of eggs (white eggs). Hy-Line Brown hens eat 2.02 pounds of feed to produce a pound of eggs (brown eggs).

For reference, a dozen large eggs weighs about a pound and a half. So if your family eats 50 dozen eggs a year, it would take 15 pounds less feed to produce the same amount of white chicken eggs as brown chicken eggs. (See calculations below.) Multiply that by all the families that eat brown eggs, and we could produce much less grain to produce the same amount of chicken eggs.

Then, I watched this video:



Whether we eat conventional, industrial brown chicken eggs or conventional, industrial white chicken eggs, the male chicks of these egg-laying strains are destroyed at the hatchery because they’re not good meat-producing birds — they’re inefficient at converting feed to meat.

9/21/2009 11:46:37 AM

Yeah, That's pretty cruel, but I'm not about to turn vegan like that video is trying to convince people to do. Chicken and eggs are to good of a source of protein and frankly, tofu gives me gas. We simply plan to raise our own chickens. They'll definitly taste better.

Patricia Kraybill_1
9/20/2009 1:57:42 PM

I am so appalled by the wonton cruelty shown in this video, that I will NEVER buy eggs or chicken EVER AGAIN !!! There's got to be something wrong with people who can treat living creatures like this. I think there will be a special place in Hell for people like them. Thank you for producing and showing this video.

9/17/2009 2:28:12 PM

I fail to see the logic in this argument, which is basically an appeal to cheap emotion. How are dead 16-week old cockerels better than dead male chicks? Dead is dead, last time I looked. And an instant death (even via grinding) is probably better than being grabbed by a large animal (a human), stuffed in a cone, and left to bleed to death. And just as dual purpose heritage breed hens are less efficient layers than those of a layer breed, cockerels from a dual purpose breed will put on meat very inefficiently, compared with designated meat breeds, as pointed out in the video. Why raise the issue of efficiency in converting feed to food when your conclusion is so easily shot down? Don't get me wrong - I'm all for heritage breeds. And I'm totally against beak trimming. My tiny pastured backyard flock of layers consists of five heritage breed hens. I also take the responsibility to slaughter my own hens humanely when the time comes; I've long since reconciled myself to the realities of the diet I eat. But this article is both muddled in its aim and rather imprecise in its arguments.

Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 64% Off the Cover Price

Money-Saving Tips in Every Issue!

Mother Earth NewsAt MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet's natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. You'll find tips for slashing heating bills, growing fresh, natural produce at home, and more. That's why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.95 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.95 for 6 issues.

Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
International Subscribers - Click Here
Canadian subscriptions: 1 year (includes postage & GST).

Facebook Pinterest Instagram YouTube Twitter flipboard

Free Product Information Classifieds Newsletters