MAX Update No. 102: The Update Index

| 7/22/2013 2:24:00 PM

Jack and MAXAs mentioned in MAX Update 100: The Shows Must Go On, the latest blog software eliminated the MAX Update index, which made finding old posts a genuine challenge. To remedy this, I've started an index on my own web site at Kinetic Vehicles, so posts can be located by number, title, or subject.

One reason this is taking me a while is it's so distracting. I search for the next post on the list and then read it and...boy, since I'm starting the index at the beginning and working my way up to the now, I haven't seen some of these posts for years, and some of them are a real trip down Memory Lane. And some make me wonder “What was I thinking?” And some claimed “I'll get back to you on that,” and I never did. And one was deliberately evasive.

Ah yes, MAX Update No. 32: Why We Resigned From The Auto X Prize. That was about four years ago, and I still (as recently as last week, in fact) get calls saying “There's got to be more to the story than that,” and yes, there was. I'll touch on two of the reasons not mentioned.

I believe the Progressive Automotive X Prize (as it was eventually named) did some good by getting people thinking about fuel efficient automobiles, but the organizers seemed to lose sight of some of their initial goals. One goal was to dramatically reduce greenhouse gas production (specifically CO2) through dramatically reducing the use of fossil fuel, but that Dramatically drifted down to Better Than Average, and ended up with the only fossil fuel use restriction on electric cars was they couldn't exceed 200 grams of CO2 per mile.

Mind you, they had their reasons for going easy on electric cars, and 200 grams per mile doesn't sound like much, but that's 20 kilograms—44 pounds—of CO2 in a hundred miles. That's more than double the CO2 output of a gallon of gasoline, about double what MAX gets (and 10 times what MAX gets on straight vegetable oil) and when you consider that the majority of the “fuel” they calculated for electric cars was nuclear and hydro, setting the emissions bar at Better Than Average is not impressive. Lots of cars are already better than average (for example, any VW TDI sedan running biodiesel blend is under 200 grams of CO2 per mile) and the X Prize Foundation wouldn't have got much press with “10 Million Dollar Prize Announced for Better Than Average Cars.”

So I wrote them a letter, as a competitor, telling them how I felt about that, and that they'd look ridiculous when my article about the rules hit print...which leads me to Reason Number 2:

7/24/2013 9:53:55 PM

Facts are EV's do far better than 200gms/mile and the Xprize screwed them, not favored them, even completely from coal.  Look at the EPA website on it.


Take the 2 seat winner, the Zero Tracer gets the energy equivalent of  330mpg at 100wthrs/mile.  Only by funny math could they come up with the mpg ratings for EV's. The US average utility power is mostly low to no CO2 or very eff, clean NG running 60% eff.  What coal is left are the most clean, eff but they are closing daily.  We have cut coal use by 33%, under 40% of generation now , and the trend is speeding up. By the time any numbers of EV's are out there coal will be around 20% of grid, making it very eff with much of the coal replacement and energy growth taken up by RE on homes, buildings making their own.


And most EV people use RE they make or buy or wasted off peak power.  Facts are in the future EV's by modulating their charging or even using the motor inverter to put power back into the grid, V2G,  when needed will save a lot of pollution, enough for the EV's to be CO2 free fuel wise.  Most EV's can run 25 yrs on $1k/1kw of PV now   sunelec   or others.


So please don't put EV's down with misinformation just because they compete with you and easily beat you in eff by a larger margin.  Claiming Xprize, and I was going to do it too but didn't for the same rules you stated,  favored EV's in the contest is rather, well we'll leave it at that. 



Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 64% Off the Cover Price

50 Years of Money-Saving Tips!

Mother Earth NewsAt MOTHER EARTH NEWS for 50 years and counting, we are dedicated to conserving our planet's natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. You'll find tips for slashing heating bills, growing fresh, natural produce at home, and more. That's why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.95 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.95 for 6 issues.

Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
International Subscribers - Click Here
Canadian subscriptions: 1 year (includes postage & GST).

Facebook Pinterest Instagram YouTube Twitter flipboard

Free Product Information Classifieds Newsletters

click me