MAX Update No. 71: Suspension Streamlining


| 5/4/2011 12:35:08 PM


MU71FairingTest 

Oregonians have been flooding the radio stations with calls about a large glowing disk hovering above the ... that’s the sun, folks, we just haven’t seen it for a while.

A perfect day to take MAX out for some aerodynamic testing. The body is off for repairs, and one of my aviation friends had some related questions, so since it’s my car and I can do what I want with it, I bolted a test fixture to the chassis and built a simple drag comparitor device to show how much better a streamlined tube is than a round tube.

Yeah, yeah, I could look it up, this isn’t cutting edge research by any means, but I’m a DIY guy, so I went ahead and did it. Besides, not every effort at streamlining is as successful as every other effort, and I wanted to try an off-the-shelf product called Streamline. It’s a PVC sleeve material that’s made for sport aviation and its shape is slightly compromised so it can fit different tubing diameters (the small stuff, which I used here, fits 5/8” to 1-1/4” tubes, the larger size fits 1-1/4” to 2” diameter tubes) and as far as I know, there’s no wind tunnel data available for that specific product.

And why do I care? Because many folks like the Old MAX body better than the New MAX body, and like the visible suspension parts and other old-timey styling cues. Anyway, I measured and found that MAX has a total of eight feet of 1” tubing in its front suspension, and a quick back-of-a-napkin calculation suggests the air resistance of that tubing costs MAX about a horsepower at 60 mph. But who trusts napkins any more?



So I got eight feet of the smaller Streamline stuff, to slide over 1” outside diameter 3/4” Schedule 40 PVC pipe, and made a fixture that had eight feet of pipe sticking out one side, and eight feet of Streamline sticking out the other. I stuck the fixture on the front of the car, stuck a digital postal scale on the dashboard, and tied the two together with some nylon cord.

Jack McCornack
5/18/2011 11:48:27 PM

Hi TDeL, Man, great minds think alike! If the car has a full body, there's no reason the chassis has to narrow so much in the footwell. Mind you, right now I'm scrambling so MAX will make a good impression at the Mother Earth News Fair in Puyallup in (gulp) two weeks, but I do have a fat-footed conversion on the drawing board and it looks like an easy modification.


TDeL
5/18/2011 12:36:22 PM

Hi Jack, I like the old Seven body style too, but your interpretation of a 50's sporty car and your eye for shape has always pleasantly surprised me. Hopefully an enclosed option will develop as well as a modded frame which gives a little more width for the legs ( I am not horizontally challenged). Looking forward to the new June unveiling. -Tom


Jack McCornack
5/17/2011 3:36:57 PM

PyroTechie, I didn't compensate. In actual use, the difference in modulus of elasticity between PVC and steel is so immense that the stiffening effect of the fairing is insignificant. In this test, all I measured was drag, not stiffness...the plain pipe didn't flex back enough to make any difference in drag that I could detect.




Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 64% Off the Cover Price

Money-Saving Tips in Every Issue!

Mother Earth NewsAt MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet's natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. You'll find tips for slashing heating bills, growing fresh, natural produce at home, and more. That's why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.95 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.95 for 6 issues.

Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
International Subscribers - Click Here
Canadian subscriptions: 1 year (includes postage & GST).


Facebook Pinterest Instagram YouTube Twitter flipboard

Free Product Information Classifieds Newsletters