The Mehrkam Wind Power Turbine

Prior to his untimely death in 1981, Terry Mehrkam's company Mehrkam Energy Development Company successfully designed and marketing wind power turbine systems.


| May/June 1980



063 merkham wind turbine2

PHOTO1: A 40-KW, six-bladed MEDC wind turbine provides power for Terry Mehrkam's rural Pennsylvania homestead. PHOTO 2: The Ray Groff family of Bath, Pennsylvania began generating power with this 12-KW Mehrkam windplant in 1977. PHOTO 3: The control room for Terry's home-based wind generator. PHOTO 4: The Bronx Frontier, a New York City-based community group, utilizes wind power.


PHOTOS: MEHRKAM ENERGY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND MOTHER EARTH NEWS STAFf

Four decades ago, windplants were a common sight on North America's farms and homesteads. At present, however—mainly because of the efforts of the Rural Electrification Administration—the great majority of yesterday's draft-driven pumps and generators have been either disassembled or simply left to the mercy of the elements.  

Naturally, there was no real problem with the wind-powered equipment . . . it's just that the then-inexpensive (and freshly installed) "grid juice" seemed to present a very attractive alternative at the time. These days the advantages of utility power are becoming less obvious . . . and many folks, both rural and urban (yes, breezes blow in the cities, too!), are considering—or already have installed—their own wind power turbine systems.

Not long ago, MOTHER EARTH NEWS sent one of her editors to Hamburg, Pennsylvania to talk to Terry Mehrkam, founder of the Mehrkam Energy Development Company. Terry's firm is a small but growing operation that not only designs and markets truly "state of the art" wind power systems, but has actually been so successful at doing so that the demand for MEDC-designed equipment is outstripping the present supply.

Terry — who is best described as the firm's designer, engineer, and part-time maintenance crew . . . when he's not busy managing the business, that is — has some definite opinions as to how a wind generator should be built. The article that follows details both the Mehrkam system and the reasons for its success. 


It should come as no surprise to anyone that countless people are scrambling for ways around the high price of energy . . . whether that power comes from oil, gasoline, or public utility lines. But—in their search for a "better way"—many folks are overlooking a time-tested, practical alternative: the wind.

One possible reason for the lack of interest in windplants is that in times past the use of "air power" was limited to areas of near-constant high winds, such as the Great Plains or North America's coastal regions.

These days, however, it's a different story. Even though the weather hasn't changed much, the available hardware has, and wind systems are coming into their own for several reasons: [1] Equipment reliability has improved substantially since the early days of windpower use. [2] Wind-driven generation plants are becoming quite cost-effective, and will prove to be even more so as public power costs increase with each year. [3] Thanks to the above mentioned advances in technology, many modern windplants can now be utilized even during minimal wind periods and are thus more practical than some of their fore runners. [4] "Down time" — for regular equipment maintenance and overhaul — has been reduced to a bare-bones minimum through sound engineering.

A New Twist to an Old Idea. . .

Since the "early" generators were, by and large, used only in extremely windy areas, the manufacturers designed their equipment to charge optimally at higher windspeeds (in the neighborhood of 18 to 20 miles per hour or more) . . . which meant that shaft RPM could range from 225 to over 900 — depending on the unit — and blade tip speeds would often approach 180 MPH!

Now it doesn't take a degree in engineering to figure out that a piece of machinery running at such speeds will undergo severe stress . . . and that eventually the hub or blades — or some other moving parts — may very well fail.

With this reliability problem in mind, Terry Mehrkam set out eight years ago to develop a windplant that did not incorporate a "built-in" failure potential. Actually, the young designer had no intention of going into the wind energy business at all. . . he was merely searching for a way to reduce commercial power consumption in his father's manufacturing enterprise. "We made a lot of components for nickel plating," Terry explains, "and — even back in 1972 — were using three to four thousand dollars' worth of electricity per year. So we were curious about the potential of wind turbines. I had for years been interested in aeronautical theory, airplane flight dynamics, and what not . . . and I was always a tinkerer by nature, so I designed and built my own wind turbine: a 10-kilowatt, two-bladed 25-footer."

Mehrkam's initial design attempt—though successful—didn't quite meet his requirements, because the machine just wasn't productive at low wind speeds. So, soon thereafter, he built a larger prototype, a 45-foot two-blader which would later serve as a guinea pig for various blade designs.

Not wanting to waste his time "reinventing the wheel", the Keystone Stater researched countless technical studies in an attempt to hit upon the right type of airfoil and blade twist for his windplant. Unfortunately—primarily because his central Pennsylvania location experienced only average winds most of the time—none of Mehrkam's early blade designs performed as well as he had expected them to. "So I decided to try a four-blade model, and immediately found that the additional 'arms' resulted in smoother operation . . . it was a very passive machine when compared to the two-blader. The idea was to have at least one blade going through one quadrant at all times so that we wouldn't get into the stress, flex, and dynamic frequency problems which occur in units using fewer blades."

Of course, what Mr. Mehrkam had done, in effect, was to kill two birds with one stone: By incorporating two additional blades into his design, he came up with a smoother-running windplant and could shorten each blade while still reaping the same amount of power as that provided by the larger-span, two-bladed windplant .

...With Excellent Results

Spurred on by the obvious success of the four-blade design, Terry took the next logical step: He added yet another pair of airfoils to further reduce his machine's shaft speed and to make it even more productive at low wind speeds.

Again, his calculations proved correct . . . the new six-blade model not only ran smoothly — with a minimum of equipment stress and an easy-to-live-with 40 decibel noise level output, as measured directly below the blades — but, even more important, charged in an unbelievably slight breeze. (After an initial 7MPH gust — which is what's required in order to get the machine rotating from a standstill — the Mehrkam windplant will continue to spin in air currents of as little as 2 MPH . . . with an effective charge being delivered in a 5-MPH wind. An 8MPH zephyr will produce as much as a kilowatt of power, and that figure is increased to between three and four kilowatts as wind speeds rise to 10-MPH.)

Obviously enough, in areas where average wind speeds are not great, an air-powered generator that can perform useful work ail year round has something to say for itself. Terry Mehrkam has since calculated that, under light breeze conditions, his six-blade model is about 15% more productive than was his own "four-feather" design . . . and a whole lot more efficient than conventional windplants that might only begin to charge at 12 MPH or more!

The Economic Factor

Naturally, a breeze-powered backyard plant isn't everyone's cup of tea (because of space limitations, nearby neighbors, and initial costs) . . . nonetheless, anyone considering an alternative source of power for individual (or group) residential — or small-scale commercial — applications should consider using the wind.

Besides the fact that MEDC's equipment can produce usable power from very little wind — independent of the public utility grid if desired — the cost-per-kilowatt of such a system, installed, currently averages about $650 . . . with some installations ( those that are used exclusively to provide resistance heating and thus don't require inverters, batteries, or other power-conditioning equipment) running as low as $550 per kilowatt, all told. When you compare such figures with the $1,000 (and greater) cost per kilowatt of the average utility, wind-powered electricity looks pretty good . . . not to mention the fact that such a generating setup can earn federal tax credits, increase the value of the property it's on, be a worthwhile investment in itself, and sometimes enable its owner to sell excess power back to the local utility!





dairy goat

MOTHER EARTH NEWS FAIR

Aug. 5-6, 2017
Albany, Ore.

Discover a dazzling array of workshops and lectures designed to get you further down the path to independence and self-reliance.

LEARN MORE