New and Improved Wind Power

Advances in residential turbines make wind power more affordable and easier to use than ever.
By Greg Pahl
June/July 2007
Add to My MSN

The Skystream 3.7 has an improved design that allows it to perform at lower wind speeds.
ROB CARDILLO
Slideshow


Content Tools

Related Content

Easier Shopping for Energy-Efficient Windows

When shopping for new windows, take advantage of these helpful resources.

The Windmill on Our Homestead

Homesteads are attempting to provide longer grazing times by dividing pasture into paddocks. The dif...

Catching the Breeze: New Technology for Storing Wind Energy

One of the disadvantages of wind power is that the wind doesn't always blow. But in the future, new ...

Power to the People

Southwest Windpower is the world’s leading supplier of distributed wind generators. With history las...

For many, home energy costs recently have increased by 50 percent (or more), motivating a growing number of people to look for alternatives. The proliferation of net metering laws, in about 40 states, as well as a growing number of state residential wind incentive programs, has given a strong boost to the small-scale wind turbine industry.

What’s more, recent technical developments have reduced blade noise and improved both turbine efficiency and longevity. There now are a number of new home-scale wind turbines with advanced technology, and there’s the promise of more to come in the near future.

For many years, residential wind turbines have been most popular in rural locations where zoning laws tend to be less restrictive and neighbors less likely to object to them (mainly on aesthetic grounds). That may be about to change. Many in the small-scale wind turbine industry think residential wind power is about to enter suburbia with simpler, less expensive systems that perform more like household appliances than complicated renewable energy systems. And the potential is enormous; it’s estimated there are at least 15 million homes with the resources necessary to make a wind installation cost effective.

But does it really make sense to install a wind turbine in your back yard? Maybe, maybe not. A wind power system that works well in one location may not work in another. There are many variables to consider: the size of your lot, zoning restrictions, wind speeds in your area, the cost and amount of electricity you use, whether your utility offers net metering, and the availability of state rebates and incentives. 

Wind Power Picks Up Speed

Harvesting the wind to generate electricity is not a new idea. In 1888, Charles F. Brush of Cleveland created a wind turbine for this purpose. Early turbines could supply enough energy for a house or two. Today, large commercial-scale turbines can produce about 3 megawatts or more, enough to power about 750 U.S. homes. The recent growth of this industry in the United States has been dramatic. Wind power capacity increased by 27 percent in 2006 and is expected to increase an additional 26 percent this year, according to the American Wind Energy Association. Enthusiasm for small-scale wind also is on the rise, with sales for residential systems at $17 million in 2005, up 62 percent from 2004, according to the association.

Residential wind turbines were first commercialized in the United States in the 1920s and were fairly popular until the Rural Electrification Administration extended electric lines to many remote areas in the 1930s and ’40s. The oil crises of the 1970s spurred a flurry of renewed interest in residential wind power until the tax credits and other government incentives that supported the industry ended in the 1980s.

But now, interest in residential wind power is on the rebound. Mike Bergey, president of Bergey Windpower Co., attributes the company’s recent growth to robust state and utility rebate programs and growing interest in clean energy technology. (Visit the Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency to see if incentives are available in your state.)

Net metering laws, which simplify the connection of residential renewable energy systems to the electric grid, also have made wind more attractive to those looking for a way to reduce their energy bills. Robert Preus, the founder of Abundant Renewable Energy (ARE), agrees and points to the impact of grid interconnection on the solar-electric market as instructive. “In the past, the vast majority of solar was battery-connected off-grid; now it’s just the opposite,” he says. Grid-interconnection allows the homeowner to reduce their grid-based energy use, while not requiring them to rely solely on wind for their needs.

Many others in the industry point to the increasing number of financial incentive programs that help reduce the high initial cost of wind systems. But according to Andy Kruse, co-founder of Southwest Windpower, people also are choosing wind simply because it’s the right thing to do. “Another key factor is unquestionably the environment,” he says. “People are looking for ways to make a difference.”

These days there are high hopes in the residential wind industry for the passing of legislation that would establish a federal tax credit for those who purchase wind turbines. According to Bergey, a federal credit would not only be an immediate benefit to taxpayers, but would also drive turbine prices down through increased manufacturing. (For help contacting Congress to voice your support, click here.)

The Basic Technology

Residential wind power has come a long way from the 1920s, but in some respects the basic technology hasn’t changed much. Turbine subsystems include a rotor (the blades) that converts the wind’s energy into rotational shaft energy; a nacelle (enclosure) containing a drive train and a generator; the tower to support the turbine; and electronic controls, electrical cables and grid interconnection equipment. Off-grid turbines do not have interconnection equipment, but normally have banks of batteries to store electricity for use during windless periods. Grid-connected turbines, on the other hand, essentially use the grid as their storage battery.

Because the rotor is what actually captures the wind, its size is extremely important. In general, the larger the rotor the better, as long as it’s matched to an appropriately sized generator.

Improved airfoil designs have boosted efficiency by as much as 35 percent at the average wind speeds typical of many residential locations. Wooden blades have been replaced by reinforced fiberglass, which reduces blade maintenance (although routine turbine and tower upkeep is still extremely important). The blades also have been redesigned to reduce the amount of noise they produce. Bergey Windpower, for example, used the new airfoil design in its 10-kilowatt BWC Excel model to improve efficiency in wind speeds as low as 9 miles per hour. In addition, new direct-drive permanent magnet alternators have been paired with sophisticated controls and inverters designed specifically for small wind turbines. Alternator efficiency on some models has been improved by about 25 percent. “We introduced the Excel back in 1983,” Bergey says. “But the one you buy today has vastly improved rotor blades and power electronics.”

Some of these advances owe at least partial credit to research and development conducted by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s Wind Technology Center in Golden, Colo. Bergey Windpower and several others have benefited from collaboration with the laboratory. The team-up helped Abundant Renewable Energy design two new residential, grid-connected turbines that are especially well-suited for harsh environments. In January 2006, the company shipped its first 2.5-kilowatt unit (the ARE 110), followed later that year by the 10-kilowatt model (the ARE 442). Both turbines are designed to operate quietly and produce more electricity in lower wind speed locations.

Southwest Windpower, which also collaborates with the laboratory, has been producing battery-charging wind turbines since 1987. Recently Southwest released a grid-connected turbine, the Skystream 3.7, that is paired with a monopole tower as short as 33 feet to make it easier to install in residential settings where zoning regulations often limit taller structures. Among a number of improvements, the new 1.8-kilowatt turbine has an extremely low “cogging torque” (resistance to start up), making it easier to start in low winds. The Skystream is a smaller unit with a lower price tag than industry averages.

Plug and Play

One thing that sets the Skystream apart from the competition is its “plug and play” design. All of the sophisticated electronic components that would normally be located in separate boxes at or near the base of the tower have been incorporated into the turbine itself, making the connection to your home’s electrical system (and the grid) a relatively simple matter. Another characteristic that sets the Skystream apart is its use of the generator to control the rotor speed. Most other small wind turbines use a “furling” strategy, which turns or tilts the turbine and blades out of the wind to protect them from overspeeding in high winds, which can destroy the generator. The Skystream, on the other hand, uses what amounts to dynamic braking by the generator to limit rotor speed.

Jim Green, senior project leader at the Wind Technology Center, explains the advantages and disadvantages of these two strategies: “The furling method is passive and relatively fail-safe because when the wind forces become sufficiently high the turbine will furl,” he says. “The alternative approach used by Skystream hopefully will be a reliable strategy, but it does require some active control in the machine. They address that by having redundant systems and fairly fail-safe power designs.” If the power goes off in a grid failure, for example, there is a switch that stops the turbine.

“One of the reasons I think the Skystream approach is going to be attractive is that the rotor speed is truly limited,” Green says. “Furling wind turbines, on the other hand, tend to let the rotor accelerate to generate the high thrust that causes the furling to take place. So, there are some higher speeds and higher forces involved that the whole machine has to deal with in that approach — but with proper design that’s OK.”

However, when it comes to tower height, residential wind expert Mick Sagrillo and others in the industry stress that the 33-foot tower that’s often part of the Skystream package is simply not tall enough to avoid wind turbulence; most in the industry recommend an 80-foot tower minimum.

“The site always determines the height of the tower,” Sagrillo says. The three most common mistakes that people make with small wind installations, according to Sagrillo, are: 1. Too short a tower; 2. Too short a tower; and 3. Too short a tower. Bergey also emphasizes this point by comparing a turbine on a short tower to a solar power collector in the shade.

Kruse argues that a general rule of thumb is to ensure the rotor extends at least 20 to 30 feet above any surrounding object within 500 feet of the tower. He agrees that a site should be thoroughly assessed; while the 33-foot monopole tower may perform well in the Texas panhandle, a taller tower might be required in areas such as upstate New York or Vermont.

At least one new Skystream feature impresses virtually all observers — the turbine’s wireless communication system. It enables the homeowner to track the turbine’s output and other operational statistics on their home computer and also allows for real-time troubleshooting if a problem should develop. Software patches and other system upgrades can be uploaded to the turbine via the same system, eliminating the need to lower the turbine to the ground for these procedures.

Real-world Performance

So, how do residential wind turbines actually perform? If they are properly installed and maintained, the record is good. Bergey Windpower, with installations in all 50 states and more than 90 countries, has a long track record of success. Abundant Renewable Energy has only a small number of its new ARE 110 turbines installed so far, but early feedback has been positive.

We did have an initial problem with a turbine component,” says Tom Carter, director of operations at Crossroads for Youth, a residential school for at risk children in Oxford, Mich. “But after it was repaired, the system has operated flawlessly. We’re very pleased with it.”

Southwest Windpower’s Skystream 3.7 turbine is new to the market, but one prototype has been in successful operation at the Wind Technology Center for more than two years. An additional 20 Skystreams have been in a beta testing program for more than six months in various residential locations around the country. The tests have gone well overall, and except for the usual minor glitches for any new product, no major system failures have been reported. Paul Westbrook of Fairview, Texas, had his beta Skystream installed in September 2006.

“Overall it’s running fine,” he says. Westbrook reports there have been no noise complaints from the neighbors. “In fact, I’ve been getting inquiries from them about how it works, how much it costs and how much power it’s producing,” he says. “There’s been a lot of interest.”

Westbrook does acknowledge the 33-foot tower was not a good match for his site, because part of his property is heavily wooded. “I put the turbine on a clear hill near the street in a corridor that I thought would have pretty good winds, but I have been stunned by how much reduction in wind has resulted from turbulence caused by the trees. Consequently, my power output is running at about one-eighth what it should be.” Westbrook plans to install a taller tower to get the turbine well above the trees.

Westbrook had another problem — getting his system connected to the grid. He’s served by an electric cooperative that had no net metering provisions and no interest in establishing any. It took five months of persistent negotiation to get the connection. Installation experiences like these highlight how crucial it is to study all the issues involved with a site before you proceed. With proper siting, residential wind may be a great way to reduce your energy costs and make a positive difference for the environment.

With growing consumer interest, there’s a good deal of optimism in the small wind sector. “We’re in a very dynamic, emerging market right now with all these state incentives in place,” Green says. “But a lot still depends on the future of energy prices.” Kruse agrees. “I’m very optimistic about it,” he says. “Provided that the cost of utility energy keeps on going up, and we keep the cost of renewable energy down with innovative technologies, it’s going to be very exciting.”

Greg Pahl is the author of The Citizen-Powered Energy Handbook: Community Solutions to a Global Crisis , and Biodiesel: Growing a New Energy Economy . Don’t despair if you don’t have a good wind site on your property. Coming soon, Greg Pahl will report on wind power projects from which the whole community can benefit by pooling their resources. 


Net Metering

Net metering laws help offset some of the cost of a grid-tied wind system by allowing the homeowner to sell extra energy back to the utility at retail prices. According to the Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency, 41 states currently require at least some utilities to offer net metering for small wind systems. For information on your state, click here.


Residential Wind at a Glance

Bergey Excel
Average Cost: $50,000*
Rated Capacity: 10 kW
Output: 1,600 kWh/month**
Warranty Stats: 5 years. Covers damage by winds up to 123 mph.

ARE 442
Average Cost: $50,000 to $80,000*
Rated Capacity: 10 kW
Output: 1,820 kWh/month**
Warranty Stats: 66 months from date of purchase or 60 months from the date of installation, whichever occurs first. Covers damage by winds up to 100 mph.

ARE 110
Average Cost: $20,000 to $35,000*
Rated Capacity: 2.5 kW
Output: 410 kWh/month**
Warranty Stats: 66 months from date of purchase or 60 months from the date of installation, whichever occurs first. Covers damage by winds up to 100 mph.

Skystream 3.7
Average Cost: $15,000 to $16,000*
Rated Capacity: 1.8 kW
Output: 400 kWh/month**
Warranty Stats: 5 Years. Covers damage by winds up to 145 mph.

*Figures are based on company estimates, and assume a 100 foot-tower.
**Estimated output assumes a 12 mph wind speed. The average U.S. household uses about 917 kWh of electricity per month.


Greg Pahl is the author of The Citizen-Powered Energy Handbook: Community Solutions to a Global Crisis , and Biodiesel: Growing a New Energy Economy . Don’t despair if you don’t have a good wind site on your property. Coming soon, Greg Pahl will report on wind power projects from which the whole community can benefit by pooling their resources.


Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next






Post a comment below.

 

MarkAnderson037
7/31/2013 3:58:37 AM

Thanks for highlighting the best way to generate more wind energy. With many people exploring options to reduce their monthly energy bills, the improved wind power generators will be popular among many homeowners.


r2
12/26/2008 6:26:28 AM
Its good to see Southwest improve their performance in slower speed wind. Kudos. Having said that you need "straight" and consistent wind for any small HAWT to work and this limits most wind sites to 100 foot towers which are NOT allowed where most people live in urban and sub-urban areas. If you are looking for small wind power solutions in urban areas, really the only choice are Vertical Axis Wind Turbines with CURVED blades which support any direction of attack and a vertical angle of attack from +25 to -25 degrees for turbulent, twisting and tumbling wind at low and medium wind speeds.. Helical blades also reduce vibration as well as noise. Even then, if you go for an urban VAWT you need to convince city government officials to let you operate such VAWTS, and it does not make sense unless there is a Feed Law (see http://www.wind-works.org/articles/feed_laws.html) Getting local government permission to erect a VAWT can take along time. You need to pick one that is quiet as well, under 60 decibels from 5 meters (just like HVAC units on a roof). HAWTS hunt in such winds, and when they do, their power output drops by as much as 35% to 65% when hunting (in light and medium winds in urban or suburban areas this can be 65%+ of the time of operation). I would suggest anyone to check out www.wind-works.org for more information on this hunting phenomena. There are some good videos there that show just how poorly HAWTS operate in urban areas. What this means is the annual yield from the small HAWT will be 35% to 65% less than advertised in urban and suburban areas, even on a 100 foot tower,, so the location of your site (no nearby trees or buildings for 1/4 mile in prevailing wind direction) and the height of the site (100 foot tower) is very important to getting close to vendor advertised power outputs. To really reach a goal of off grid self dependency you will need to employ solar as well as use clean storage like air compression (

Steve_1
6/23/2008 5:14:22 AM
WInd power has always fascinated me, but check out this new wind turbine that is coming to market in New York: www.windtamerturbines.com/ It seems to offer a very high efficiency and is low impact to wildlife and humans that live near one.

spanish_houston
12/16/2007 7:35:29 PM
Alexcis: You need to check your site directly. It is important to look at solar and wind maps that show what class your area is in, but it is more important to look at the site yourself because terrain differences cause differences in microclimates and sun exposure. For instance, if your land is on the north side of a mountain, the mountain may block sun for much of the day. The same goes for large trees in a heavily forested area. And so on. Wind is much more variable and much more affected by differences in terrain causing unique micro-climates. You simply have to be onsite checking the wind patterns over a space of a year to get an idea of what wind patterns and speeds will be like on your land. Not only that, but individual spots on your property may have much more wind on average than the rest of the land. I live in central Spain, and this area gets good sun most of the year. Because of the large number of mountain ranges, there are many areas within Spain that also get good wind. I get a fair amount of wind. In my opinion, it is always best to go with a hybrid system if you are off-grid (I have a 1kW Bergey wind turbine and 600W PV system that supplies all my house electrical needs; of course, I have a small house, all my electrical appliances are ultra energy-efficient, and my energy-consumption habits and lifestyle are conservative.) The sun-wind combo compliments each other. Often when it is not sunny, it is windy. And you often get wind at night when there is no sun. As a matter of fact, taking advantage of as many energy sources as possible is best. I plan to put a micro-hydro turbine in my seasonal creek in future because the times of the year when I get both little wind and little sun are those times when my creek is exploding with flowing water energy. The trick is determining the balance. If you get lots of sun all year round, and the wind is strong on occasion, go with a bigger PV array and smaller wind generator and vic

paige_4
11/25/2007 8:25:30 PM
looking for info, residential wind power, chandler texas, thank you

captdan2
11/25/2007 3:37:45 PM
I enjoyed your article on Windpower. I just installed a 10KW Bergey on a 100' Lattice tower. I have also just become a Dealer for Bergey and hope to get very involved in Wind Energy. I have been happy with my production so far. I havae produced 1050 KWH in the first 23 days and we have had less wind than usual for November.There were no problems with installation or start up and have been no glitches since commissioning on November 2, 2007. I also must give credit to Ameren Power for their quick response to my request for inter connect to the grid. They were quite helpful and cooperative to work with. I had anticipated a less than enthusiastic response but was pleasantly surprised. I'm looking for a 8 year pay back on my system with the 50% funding from the State of Illinois and the recently passed net metering act which takes place April 1st of next year. Hope this is useful info for somebody and would be glad to answer any inquires at the E-mail address.. Thanks Dan

linda_84
7/10/2007 4:26:28 PM
thank you john for your comment. you are so right.

Lee_16
6/25/2007 9:53:00 PM
Sheryl: Actually, the wind map does open but the map is awfully small. I did some rough scaling and it looks like you are out of luck as you are in class 1; you would need to be further west (like Canton) just to get into a class 2 area. Alexcis: We are building north of Sparks, NV which is somewhere between a class 2 and 3. Wind power has a terrific capital cost and we are not going to use it; we will use solar for electric and water heating. But I am not going to invest in batteries, the grid will provide the off-solar power. Do some back issue reading of Home Power as they are very thorough about costs and even systemics of all systems. But start with knowing your site's solar potential and wind power class, how much do you want to spend and how much you want/need to be off the grid. Getting off the grid will require both solar and wind generation. Here in Tucson, solar water heating saves so much electric power for a small investment(built it my- self from a kit) with a 2 year payback. Electric is a long term payback,I figure it will take 10 years in Nevada. Hope this helps. Lee Olson

alexcis
6/20/2007 2:09:38 AM
Hello! My family is currently building two houses on our ranch property in Mora, NM. We live in San Diego, CA and are doing much of our business via email/phone correspondence. Right now we are currently debating whether to go with solar or wind energy for our houses. Could you please explain the benefit of choosing to go solar over wind or vice versa? Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. -Alexcis Melendez

Trevor_3
6/10/2007 9:30:25 AM
The problem with solar and wind is in the fails assumption that net metering actually works, if it did, the power companies would not need a LAW mandating it. Imagine a scientist came up with a magic black box that put out no power 2/3 the time, then of 1/3 of the time it put out too little power with surges of way too much power. In the real world, that is an interseting novelty, but hardly useful. That is solar and wind. They put out random amounts of power most of the time. To be useful, you have to match the power with the load. The average house uses 1.5 kw/hr, but try running the average house on a 1.5 KW generator. You can't. By the time you turn on a microwave and the refrigerator, you are way over 1.5 KW and you've burned up the generator. You need a power source that can rise and fall, that can match the demand. To run a house, you need surges of 10KW down to .5KW. The magic of the grid is its ability to do this seamingly impossible task. That is the science of LOAD MANAGEMENT. The more random power generators that get plugged into the grid by legal mandates of NET METERING, the more difficult load management will be. Consider, every time the wind surges, the windmill pumps power into the grid. Perhaps enough to run two houses. The wind dies. Now your house and the other house start drawing power from the grid under NET METERING. To the load manager, he has the effect of 2 homes suddenly jumping onto the grid out of nowhere. The missing link is the same problem electric cars have, The battery. To store in the megawatt range is difficult and expensive to do. To make windmills really work, you have to store power in the TERAwatt range. The challenge of that dwarfs the challenges of the Manhatton Project. Sorry, it ain't ready. Not yet.

Sheryl_8
5/31/2007 4:04:40 PM
Is Wind Power Cost-effective for You? The link to the wind map in this article does not work. How can I find out whether Hawkins TX 75765 is an effective place to build a windmill?

Catspaw
5/29/2007 5:25:52 PM
Genrally speaking I find only about 5%-10% of any publication useful. Therefore, I peruse many of them. While I'm not cancelling my subscription to MEN, it never ceases to amaze me at some of the things I read in your magazine. Apparently you feel that somewhere between $15,000 and $80,000 for a wind power system is affordable. While in the large picture (the business or financial picture) it might be cost effective, it's not particularly useful to the average person. Unfortunately, there is a very low percentage of people that have more than enough money and a very high percentage of people who don't have enough. If it's going to cost me $15,000 plus to save the world, then the world is going to die. Because I, and the majority of people, can't afford this. Since it's really up to the majority of people (you know....the ones without alot of money....) it would be more effective to present articles that us poor people can find useful.

cindi_1
5/21/2007 2:31:13 PM
ABOUT !!June/July 2007 New and Improved Wind Power By Greg Pahl I would like to see a comprehensive article about the onslaught of our rural countryside's by mega corporations driven by greed and subsidized to the teeth by our government.All this crap about wind power is nothing but another way to factory farm our resources.This is insanity at its best, and without an end in sight. Gov. Spitzer, following Pataki's previous administrations agenda,and what's around the corner??? the threat of eminent domain down our throats, driven by lobbyists foreign corporations. Sound familiar??? take a look at some of these websites if you need some heart wrenching testimony and FACTS about these wind farms and Americas increasing loss of civil rights. You spout off about saving the land for future generations? This is another HUGE scam, FREE CHEESE!!! come and get it, the casualties of war( tax payers) will sit and watch, do nothing as usual. http://www.windaction.org/ http://www.savewesternny.org/








Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.