Environmentalists Fight Against the USDA National Standard for Organic Food

The USDA national standard for organic food will regulate the production and processing of organic foods, with consumers and environmentalists protesting the choice to consolidate the current patchwork of "organic" or natural labels on foods.
By Erin Torneo
August/September 2000
Add to My MSN

The USDA's attempt to regulate this fast-growing sector of American agriculture suggests that the agency can no longer ignore consumer demand nor the growing community of organic farmers, many of whom are small-scale producers.
PHOTO: MOTHER EARTH NEWS STAFF


Content Tools

Related Content

Growing the Giants

Have some fun in your garden this year and grow something giant!

USDA Knows of Link Between Factory Meat and MRSA

The US Department of Agriculture really, really doesn’t want us to read this report, which proves th...

A Raw Deal

Almond and wholesale nut farmers in California filed a lawsuit this month against the U.S. Departmen...

Whole Foods Submits Products for Non-GMO Verification

Whole Foods Market commits to verifying it products as free of genetically modified organisms. Natur...

Consumers and environmentalists are against the new USDA national standard for organic food. 

What's in a name? Or, in this case, a label? According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) newest standards if you buy foods that say "organic," chances are that they not only contain modified or irradiated ingredients, but that some of those ingredients may have been produced using hormones, antibiotics, and synthetic or sludge fertilizers. Seeking to consolidate the current patchwork of "organic" and "natural" labels on foods, the new USDA national standard for organic food will regulate the production and processing of organic foods and ingredients.

Presently, products marketed as "organic" are certified by numerous state and private agencies, thereby creating domestic consumer confusion and complicating the export of products. But under the USDA's new proposal, which Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman called "the most comprehensive and strongest organic standard in the world," all crops, livestock and processed foods that want to include "organic" on their labels will have to be produced under uniform guidelines governing the methods, substances and handling that go into their production. Three controversial processes in particular — the use of genetically modified ingredients, the use of radiation to decontaminate, and the use of sewage sludge as fertilizer — are specifically prohibited under the new labeling criteria.

The USDA's attempt to regulate this fast-growing sector of American agriculture suggests that the agency can no longer ignore consumer demand (estimated retail sales of organic foods in 1999 were nearly $6 billion) nor the growing community of organic farmers, many of whom are small-scale producers. In the past, many USDA policies were criticized for discriminating against both consumers and small farmers. In a recent press release, however, the USDA confidently claims that its new standard is "exactly what American consumers and organic farmers want," and the department announced additional measures to promote organic agriculture, including a trial, risk-management insurance program to aid the organic farming community.

But will stringent federal regulations encourage small-scale organic farming? Katherine DiMatteo, the Organic Trade Association's executive director, thinks the rules could hinder rather than help. "Some of the requirements may prove to be a challenge to the industry particularly for Smaller operations," she said in a public statement. "For instance, will the supply of approved materials be sufficient to allow production of the organic products consumers clamor for?"

The genetically modified foods controversy, ("Brave New Food", MOTHER, April/May 2000), is a touchy subject where science, social values and commerce clash, causing both consumer suspicion and trade blockades. As a precursor to more recent protests, organic producers, concerned consumers and environmentalists rallied against the USDA's 1997 proposal, arguing that its standards not only threatened the good name of "organic," but also allowed big agribusinesses to compete in the burgeoning organic market by blurring the lines between non-organic and organic production methods. Now, nearly three years later, those protests are being accounted for in the USDA's new standards. And while the implications of these regulations for organic farmers remain to be seen — the proposal could go into effect as early as the end of this year — the victory for consumers is clear: "Organic," under any other label other than "USDA Certified," simply wouldn't be organic.

—Erin Torneo 


Previous | 1 | 2 | Next






Post a comment below.

 








Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.