National Uniformity for Food Act Would Undermine Our Best Food Safety Standards

Tabitha Alterman, Mother Earth News Associate Editor
July/August 2006
Add to My MSN


Content Tools
Have you heard about the 'National Uniformity for Food Act' yet? If passed, this controversial bill will undermine approximately 200 state food safety and food labeling laws, and prohibit state and local governments from setting food safety standards higher than those established by the federal government.

Currently, states have chosen to set higher standards in numerous areas. For instance, local state governments maintain regulations that ensure food served in restaurants, schools and nursing homes is safe to eat. (The federal FDA has no requirements for the safety of food served in such establishments.) According to Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), 'This bill would eliminate virtually every state and local law that provides greater protection than our federal food laws.'

Alaska labels all its genetically modified fish. New York and Rhode Island limit toxic materials in food packaging. Illinois regulates egg processing to reduce contamination. California has set a maximum for lead and alcohol content in candy, requires the labeling of ingredients that are known to be carcinogens and prohibits the use of certain dietary supplements by high school athletes. Sixteen states assure that shellfish is not contaminated. Maine requires that food producers disclose the use of post-harvest pesticides. Numerous states regulate potentially harmful food additives. Maryland requires a label if 'fresh' food was previously frozen, and Delaware requires one if carbonated beverages contain artificial sweeteners.

By enacting legislation that makes food laws all conform to one federal model, all these progressive policies will be made illegal. Supporters of the bill include food giants such as HJ Heinz Co., Kraft Foods, Sara Lee Corp., Nestle USA and many supermarket chains.

This legislation has already passed the House (H.R. 4167), but it's not too late to do something about it! The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee is considering the National Uniformity for Food Act (S. 3128) this week.

Post a comment below.


1/26/2011 2:11:01 PM
I think that neither nationalization nor globalization are good ideas. I think that the local community should be deciding the food safety laws. Mind you I don't write for the Mother Earth News, but still. I'm not much for imperialism in general, and that definitely includes standards set for what people eat.

TERRY Gray_2
7/26/2006 12:00:00 AM
Amazing. You folks promote globalization in almost every issue yet you backoff from nationalization. Do you think that globalization begins globally?What kind of standards would be set if everything was global, who would set them, and how would we fight the ones with which we disagree? National uniformity is just a step in your precious globalization. Be careful what you wish for.

Subscribe Today!

Pay Now & Save 67% Off the Cover Price

(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here