The three contenders in our wood chopping contest from left to right: the Monster Maul, Chopper 1, and an ordinary maul.
PHOTO: MOTHER EARTH NEWS STAFF
A while ago, two manufacturers sent us samples of their patented people-powered log splitters: the Monster Maul (available from Sotz Corporation) and Chopper 1 (available from Chopper Industries) The folks who make the two splitters suggested we try them out and see what we thought. Well, since we did have some wood chopping work to do (somebody's got to cut the kindlin' for MOTHER EARTH NEWS' alcohol fuel still), we figured we'd see if the block busters were as good as they're claimed to be. And—just to make the comparison fair—we decided to rate the two new tools against an "ordinary" wood-splitting maul we picked up at a local hardware store.
We started the "Splittathon" by testing the 20-pound, hardened steel Monster Maul, and found that the tool clearly deserved its name. When the heavy implement—with its sharply angled (33°) wedge head—is dropped onto a billet, the firewood has just about no choice but to split asunder. It seemed to be unbreakable (no more ruined handles!), never stuck in a round, and divided even the knottiest pieces. However, the tool is heavy, and the average firewood cutter would feel more than a wee bit weary after a few hours of lifting and swinging a massive Monster Maul.
We next tested the innovative, seven-pound Chopper 1, and found that this log splitter is also a darn good tool. In fact, the outward pushing action of the head's built-in levers was so effective that both halves of a straight-grained block often flew 10 feet out from the chopping surface. (Let this be a warning to any curious onlookers!) Chopper 1 is balanced more like an axe than a maul, so it swings easily. The splitter never—in our experience—buried itself in a billet, but it did bounce off any log that wouldn't pop apart.
The key, therefore, to this particular tool's success is its bite: "Chop" splits what it grabs. The wood thwacker does sink its "sideways teeth" into large green-or dry-straight-grained pieces, and some mid-sized misshapen billets, too. It won't, however, rip those especially cantankerous knotted rounds that are every woodchopper's bane.
The seven-pound "go-devil" proved (as thousands of homesteaders already know) to be quite adequate for most wood-block business. The hickory-handled tool can crack many a fair-sized round. However, it did fail to open overly knurly pieces. The farmer's maul has also been known to stick fast in the middle of a log and require the use of wedge and sledge for its retrieval.
The last judgment in our competition takes place not in the wood yard but in the wallet. The least expensive log splitter, not surprisingly, was the go-devil ... which cost us $15.95. The Monster Maul trailed behind at $27.95 delivered. (You can buy a lighter MM—with a 12-pound head—for $22.98 prepaid.) Chopper I was the most costly of the three at $34.95 delivered. (You can purchase the lever—action wood splitter with an unbreakable "Fiber-Core" handle—which would save writing off to Pennsylvania for wooden replacements-for an additional $2.50.)
And the Winner Is ...
So what's the verdict in our Splittathon? Unfortunately (but realistically), there is no clear cut winner. No one wood splitter dominated every category. The Chopper 1—because it avoided sticking and "handled" well—is probably the most effective tool to use if you split mostly straight-grained green wood. It is also the most expensive of the three. The Monster Maul on the other hand rules the field when it comes to tearing open stubborn knotty logs, but its chief splitting asset—its weight—could become a liability to anyone who depended on it as his or her only splitting tool. And, of course, the standard go-devil works mighty fine on the "average" round and is the least expensive of all, but will occasionally jam tight in a billet.
All three implements split wood a darn sight better than an ordinary axe, but each of the tools will suit a different need and different budget. So we're giving you the facts and the results of our comparisons. It's up to you to pick "the winner" for yourself.