As vineyards across the Midwest are being damaged or destroyed by pesticide drift, growers are calling for legislation to address the problem.
Tom Zumpfe holds a bunch of Frontenac grapes he said were stunted by herbicide drift. “At least half the grapes are either BBs or they’re non-existent,” Zumpfe said.
Photo by Grant Gerlock/Harvest Public Media
Reposted with permission from Harvest Public Media.
As Midwest vineyards move in next door to longstanding fields of corn or soybeans, they don’t always make good neighbors. Occasionally, herbicides like 2,4-D, drift beyond their target, and for nearby vineyards the results can be devastating. Grape and vegetable growers in the Midwest are pushing regulators for tougher rules governing pesticide drift, and asking their neighbors to look before they spray.
2,4-D is a common herbicide used by farmers because it kills weeds but doesn’t kill their corn. Landscapers and golf courses use it on lawns and fairways. Highway crews often spray 2,4-D on road ditches.
“Unfortunately, it just so happens that grapes are very sensitive to small amounts of 2,4-D,” said Lowell Sandell, a weed scientist at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
The problem is not direct spray; it’s pesticide drift. The use of any weed killer can result in herbicide drift. A stiff breeze can carry tiny droplets from the sprayer in one field to the vineyard next door.
But 2,4-D and another chemical, dicamba, remain a threat for pesticide drift up to two days after they are sprayed. On a hot day they can volatilize, or evaporate, and take to the wind.
Tom Zumpfe has seen the results first hand. He and his partner, Cathleen Oslzly, planted 8,000 grape vines on their acreage near Eagle in eastern Nebraska as an ambitious retirement project.
“We put our first plants in the ground in 2006,” Zumpfe said, walking through vines of Frontenac, Seval and Vignoles. “Close to 16 acres. And we’re probably the fourth- or fifth-largest vineyard in the state.”
Their plan was to build their winery last year and officially open for business. As Zumpfe held a vine with pale, shriveled leaves, he explained why those plans are on hold. “You see, this leaf looks like it’s had hot water poured on it,” Zumpfe said. “That’s 2,4-D signature type of damage.”
Last year, Zumpfe’s plants were hit with 2,4-D herbicide drift, leaving his vines with that same scalded look. It was one of 75 pesticide drift cases reported to the Nebraska Department of Agriculture in 2012. This year, it happened again. Zumpfe has lost two years of harvest.
“We thought we were going to lose about half our vineyard, the plants looked so bad,” Zumpfe said. “We had about a $600,000 loss in sales.”
Grape and vegetable growers across the country are concerned that pesticide drift could be an even greater threat to their farms in the future. Monsanto and Dow Agrosciences are developing soybeans that are resistant to either 2,4-D or dicamba in addition to the herbicide, Roundup. It’s a way of getting past Roundup-resistant weeds. Along with the new seeds, there will be new formulations of 2,4-D and dicamba, which the companies have said will increase spray drift control.
“They will probably be better, but any time you apply a pesticide there’s spray drift potential,” said Lowell Sandell at UNL. “That’s why folks want to take the most care they can.”
Nebraska grape growers are seeking extra reassurance. A bill in the Nebraska state legislature would have created buffer zones around vineyards where farmers would need permission before spraying 2,4-D or dicamba. That could make the new soybeans irrelevant. It was a big request from a small industry. The bill stalled, but the agriculture committee is studying the pesticide drift issue.
Jeff Wilmes, general manager of Kaup Seed and Fertilizer in West Point, Neb., thinks restrictions are unnecessary. “If you’re a good neighbor with that vineyard, you’ll work around what’s the best time to spray,” Wilmes said. Kaup Seed and Fertilizer do contract spraying in northeast Nebraska. Before spraying, they go to Drift Watch, a website where vineyards can map their fields. If a sensitive crop is close by, they call ahead and make sure the wind is blowing the right way.
Spray drift control seems to be a bigger problem right now for vineyards in states like Nebraska, South Dakota and Kansas, where the wine industry is still in its early stages, according to Iowa State University grape specialist, Mike White.
After a rash of pesticide drift incidents in the early 2000s, White said Iowa is down to a few severe cases per year. He said the numbers went down with education, sometimes by workshop and sometimes by lawsuit. White said settlements can reach $20,000 per acre, and news like that travels fast. “It goes through the coffee shop. It goes through the (grain) elevator,” White said. “It only takes about one settlement in a local area and then everybody says ‘Hey, we'd better not drift on that vineyard.’”
August should have marked the beginning of harvest season at Dove Landing vineyard, but any grapes Tom Zumpfe found on the vine are being dropped to the ground to allow the vines to conserve their energy. With time, the vines can work through the effects of pesticide drift. Zumpfe plans to do the same. “We’re in it for the long haul,” Zumpfe said. “These plants, typically they’ll live 50, even 75 years. They could be here for a long, long time. As long as we can keep them healthy, they will be here.”
With more than 150 workshops, there is no shortage of informative demonstrations and lectures to educate and entertain you over the weekend.LEARN MORE