Are We Losing the Meaning of Sustainability?

A recent ad campaign from one of the world’s largest agribusinesses misuses and confuses the meaning of "sustainability."
By the MOTHER EARTH NEWS editors
August/September 2009
Add to My MSN

Monsanto and sustainability. Biotech and green. Whether these terms can be closely linked or are mutually exclusive, the heart of the matter is the meaning of sustainability — whether we can live within our ecological means.
PHOTO: ISTOCKPHOTO/ELENA ELISSEEVA


Content Tools

“Having lost sight of our goals, we redouble our efforts.” — Mark Twain

In a recent magazine advertisement, Monsanto — one of the world’s largest agribusinesses and a purveyor of genetic engineering and agro-chemicals — has appointed itself a representative of “sustainable agriculture.”

In a certain context, they have a point.

Monsanto argues in its advertising campaign that we’ll need to double agricultural production by 2050 to feed 9 billion people in a world afflicted by climate change. The so-called “green revolution” of industrial agricultural that began in the late 1950s allowed us to exploit fossil fuel resources to sustain unprecedented rates of population growth. Therefore, Monsanto suggests, we’ll need more and better technology to survive our continuing growth.

At best, this strategy might carry us through the next 40 years or so. But then what?

“Sustainable” is a buzzword these days, attached to everything from roofing tar to dish soap. It is the best of our buzzwords — it’s more descriptive than “eco-friendly,” more specific than “green,” and more succinct than “environmentally sensitive” — but overuse is threatening to change the meaning of sustainability.

Little that is described as “sustainable” matches the description. None of our agricultural practices — natural or industrial — are sustainable until we stabilize the human population. Ditto for sustainable housing. Sustainable forestry requires that we grow trees fast enough to satisfy our demand without ruining the forest in the process. Again, we’ll have to stabilize demand eventually.

Listening to the chatter, it seems we’ve lost sight of the real goal: a permanent, healthy home for humanity within the ecosystem we share with the planet’s plants and animals.

“The world’s farmers will need to double food production by 2050. Biotechnology can help,” Monsanto’s ad proclaims.

Reading that, one can’t help but think of Mark Twain. 



















Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

Mother Earth NewsAt MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet's natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That's why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.

(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here