Nature and Environment

Because at 160,000 years, the party is just getting started.

Add to My MSN

A Noble Goal: Living Within Our Budget of Energy

11/4/2010 7:43:05 PM

Tags: Fuel economy, Craig Vetter

4-new-title 

I recently received this message from a European emailer:

"Just found and read your site.  It is good to find that there are Americans thinking and caring about the future and not just starting another war for the next few oil fields. I wish there would be more of your sort." 

Is this what the world thinks of us? His email made me wonder:

4-goal 

I have heard it said (and I don’t think they were kidding): “He who dies with the most toys wins.”

I have also heard it said: “You can never have too much power.”

4-fuel-burning 

Americans seem to want more. More fuel, more horsepower, more money, more growth, more GNP, more square footage, more sex, more entertainment, more freedom. More everything, really.

Is having “More” our goal?

It gets worse. We seem to think that we should be able to have anything, do anything and say anything, anytime.

4-constitution 

We call this Freedom.

4-T-shirt 

Freedom and Responsibility go together.

One of my previous posts asks the question: “How will we live if there is no power in the grid and no gas at the pump?” (See No Gas at the Pumps ... No Power in the Grid.)

My answer is: We need to learn how to “live better on less energy.” We must take responsibility for our destiny.

4-American-quotes 

Today, we must learn to: “Live better on less energy”

Abbey’s comment of 10/29/2010 says: "What I see in too many post of this nature is the always the same thing, next week we are all going to be living in the dark ages again."

I think you are missing the "Living better" part of my post, Abbey.

Living better means living better than we live now, not living worse. Don't feel bad ... most people either miss the "Living better" part or just can’t conceive of living better with less energy.

It is easy to solve a problem once we identify the problem. 

The problem is: “We are using more energy than we have  

Our greed is making us poor and others rich. We may be free to act but we are not free from the consequences of our actions.  Some of these oil producing countries want to destroy us with money that was once in our pockets.

The solution is: “Living better on less energy”  

How much energy, Craig?

The energy we have, of course.

I am trying. Let me show you an example:

Three out of every four gallons of fuel for transportation in the U.S. is imported. To live within our budget of energy, we need to reduce fuel imports by 75%. The following vehicles go faster, carry more and consume less fuel:

4-challengers  

See more on  www.craigvetter.com 

None of these vehicles has more than 30 horsepower.  Some have about 20.  This kind of power in shapes like this will take you 80 mph at 80 mpg. Do they look strange to you? This is because they are really streamlined. Streamlined – round at the front – pointed at the rear - is the best shape that goes through the air.  Airplane designers know this. Airplanes are streamlined. Automobile and motorcycle designers don't seem to care.

We are at the very beginning of developing these new forms of transportation. They are not Lexus-like in comfort yet. But in time they can be. I cannot stress enough that now is the time to solve our problems, when there is still power in the grid and fuel at the pump.

Imagine a lifestyle that is sustainable … meaning we are not using up our resources faster than they are being regenerated. Imagine “living better - on less energy.” Imagine generating the energy we need from our own homestead. Who would need the grid? Who would need fuel from the pump?

This sounds like real Freedom to me.

In summary: 

My goal is to learn how to live within our budget of energy … from our homestead and from our national resources.

Would it be a good goal for you?

Would it be a noble goal for our country?

I thank our European emailer for inspiring us think about the kind of people we are.



Related Content

No Gas at the Pumps ... No Power in the Grid

How will we live with no gas at the pump and no power in the grid?

MAX Update No. 96: Jevons' Paradox and Gore's Dilemma

Does 100 mpg fuel economy justify cross-country recreational travel? Maybe so and maybe not, but I n...

Microsoft Hohm Application Tracks Energy Use

The new Microsoft Hohm application makes it easy to track your energy use and provides simple recomm...

AIA’s New Tool Makes Predicting Energy Use Easier

To meet its goal of making all new buildings carbon-neutral by 2030, the American Institute of Archi...

Content Tools




Post a comment below.

 

frank lee
5/21/2011 12:54:19 AM
This blog contains some of the most insightful posts I've seen in a long, long time. Bravo! Now... where'd everybody go?

Craig Vetter
1/5/2011 9:54:43 AM
Thank you, Mandy: I think you have the situation pegged. We cannot count on our elected leaders. We need to do it ourselves. In the bigger picture, we have become used to having hundreds of horsepower or kilowatts (all the same) at our disposal. Sure has been nice. Life has been comfortable and cushy, hasn't it? Learning how to "live better on our own resources" is my goal. 'Tis a noble goal. Sounds like you are well on your way.

Mandy Lange
12/7/2010 7:53:45 PM
I just posted on a similar subject about the energy crisis and I will say here like I said on the other blog...we have become enamored with our "toys"! Although, reducing energy is needing to be top priority, sadly too many of the legislators and voters are in the conspicous consumption track and would never dare ponder laws to reduce energy outputs/usage. America is not the country immigrants should be aspiring to live in as it once was. We are so full of ourselves over here that it is shameful. I agree that it will be individuals that make a difference not a law. I, myself, hang my clothes outside to dry, have a large veggie garden in town, all landscaping is edible, use rain barrels to conserve water, use CFL's entirely in the house, rarely use A/C, have a compost pile, walk to most places, am an avid recycler, etc. If there is a benefit to individuals taking control of their energy usage, it is in seeing lower bills and knowing you are not contributing to the energy crisis. If, god forbid, there is a catastrophic energy crisis where electricity fails to work, the "green" individuals will be the ones who have the self-sustainability skills to venture through the new "Dark Age".

Craig Vetter
11/29/2010 9:18:34 AM
I know you, Larry. I have seen your home. It is not connected to the grid. You are indeed living better on less. You did this yourself. Your community yawns. Individuals like you will make the difference. Not communities. Not bureaucrats.

Larry Weingarten_2
11/26/2010 10:33:18 PM
Hello Craig: For a long time America has been looked up to by people around the world as a place where dreams can be freely chased and those things that really matter in life, like family, education and personal beliefs are sacrosanct. Sadly now, this has changed and the world finds much less to like about America. I'd put as a noble goal, returning America to that esteemed position. An educated, engaged and responsible populace will be needed to achieve the goal, but energy must also play a huge role in getting us there. The flip side of our wasting more energy per person than most any other country in the world is that we will be able to save more energy. It will involve local community efforts across the US as it's too much for individuals and too much for federal government to handle. It's never been perfect, but I remember when America worked much better than it does now. I'd love to see it work so well again. Yours, Larry

Craig Vetter
11/26/2010 10:31:25 PM
Vetter part 3: Sean asks: I'm just wondering what powers the machine that can harvest all these wood chips or bio-mass? Craig answers: Great question. As we write, I am drying out a pile of grass clippings (cut by Diesel, 25% US… 75% foreign… drying by the sun). After two weeks, the clippings still would not burn. So, they set in the sun, drying. I am watching a pile of leaves, too. I’d like to see just how big a pound of each is, wouldn’t you? Then we will burn a pound. Stay tuned Sean further notes: Your dependence is their power. Stop giving them your power and take responsible action for yourself. You understand the game, Sean

Craig Vetter
11/26/2010 10:23:53 PM
More Vetter: David suggests a Federal Mandate to retrofit every house with solar. However, he suspects that existing power producers would not allow it. Craig replies: While existing power producers could lobby the bureaucrats, bureaucrats don’t care about living within our means. Bureaucrats don’t care about budgets. They just seem to think only as far as their next election. We will have to do this ourselves. Power producers cannot stop us from assuming responsibility for our own needs. Steve R says: So does America have a goal? Yes. To protect economic growth and GDP growth at all costs. This means more and more consumption. Craig comments: Advertisements tell us we need more and more. “More” makes the GNP go up. Going up must be “good” because it is the opposite of going down, which, by definition, means recession and depression. The term GNP gross National Product at one time meant the sum of all domestic production for a year. As the US produced less, the definition got changed. It included services. As production moved overseas, GNP got changed again. Now it includes the net profit from overseas investments “GNP” has no useful meaning anymore. There is nothing to protect.

Craig Vetter
11/26/2010 10:21:52 PM
Yesterday was our day of Thanksgiving in the US. Our first Thanksgiving was observed by the Pilgrims in 1620. They gave us our first national goal in the Mayflower Compact as being “ for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian Faith” This is good enough for me. In Genesis 1:28, God said: “Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea , and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.” Dominion is the key word here. Dominion implies taking responsibility. It means taking care of. Certainly it does not mean “ use it up… waste and squander.” In general, you seem to like the idea of living within our means, as Ben Franklin advised. Could there be something essentially American here? t. brandt asks why we need a national goal and suggests that we are too big. Craig replies: Too big to live within a budget? I don’t think so. Isn’t this the kind of thinking we are getting from our bureaucrats? If “living beyond our means” was working, we would not be reasoning together.

David Sherrod
11/20/2010 11:20:43 AM
In recent news we hear that the German Chancler publically stated that, "do to the popularity of solar power, it was putting too big a burden on the aging power grid." He was suggesting by inference that the folks should back off on the solar. One commenter suggested that they shut down some of the coal and decil power production and keep the solar comming. If this amount of solar can be produced in Germany why not here? Why isn't there a Federal mandate for retrofitting every house with solar, paid for at a monthly rate, say 30$ a month until it's paid for. This is of course a retorical question as eventhough it's feasable, the existing power producers would not allow it,and let's face it they have the money to stop it. oh well.

Sean Wenger
11/13/2010 10:02:22 PM
This is a noble goal. Energy consumption is one of those things people don't think about (we take for granted the lights come on when we hit the switch). How the power was made and how it got there is something we tend to ignore. If you cut down the amount of energy you use to meet your needs (streamlining by way of example) then you can meet those needs with a less powerful engine. When it comes to saving, we are talking about saving time and money. The cost of fuel for an engine dwarfs the cost of the engine over its lifetime. If you can run that engine on inexpensive, easily harvested fuel then the cost to meet your needs drops further. The engine (or engine system) might be costly to put in place. Once in place you will not care if there is gas in the pumps or power in the grid. You will be independent, but only if you accept the responsibility. Every region, everywhere, has a system in place that can be tapped for power. If it does not, then people don't live there, or they import their power. There may not be one system that does it all (provides power in every region) except the one that everyone is currently using. If all power was generated by the people for the people, then who cares what a governing body does with its obsolete resources? Your dependence is their power. Stop giving them your power and take responsible action for yourself. The USA mechanized and armed the world against tyranny and oppression, thank God for that. Is this the same people?

SteveR
11/12/2010 3:45:02 PM
I'm afraid the original emailer's feelings towards the USA is in fact how many people perceive the country. I am a US citizen living abroad and admitting that one is from the US is not something done with a great amount of zeal or pride as it once may have been. There is too much to defend and too much of it is indefensible and reprehensible. If only more Americans got the opportunity to see themselves from outside in and without the biased and filtered local media. The US has lost its way and holds no moral high ground anynore and is seen more of a hindrance to progressing the issues of the world than a leader. At issue is not the fundamentals upon which the country was founded but rather an economic system and model which it imported and embraced because it worked so well for the empire from which it sought to distance itself. That economic model is predicated on unlimited resources, continuous inflationary growth and deficit financing. This suited when there were still worlds to conquer and resources to exploit. As the world has become smaller, continuous growth becomes more desperate and damaging. Meeting needs becomes creating demand, fueling consumerism, product obsolescence, waste. So does America have a goal? Yes. To protect economic growth and GDP growth at all costs. This means more and more consumption. So, while it is clearly possible to live a good lifestyle on 1/4 of the energy, it is in no one's economic interest to do so. Steve

George Works
11/12/2010 8:14:21 AM
Thanks for the article, Craig. We live on a Dutch Caribbean island with mostly European neighbors. Somehow, in Europe, energy conservation didn't get twisted up into politics so most everyone takes it seriously. Our house gets much of its energy from solar panels, we get our water from rainwater stored in a cistern, and we drive less than 5000 miles per year in a car with a 0.9 liter engine. Some of our neighbors drive electric cars. We don't miss the high energy American life in the slightest.

Craig Vetter
11/10/2010 8:15:06 AM
t. brandt asks why we need a national goal and suggests that we are too big. Too big to live within our means? The goal of our country was written into the preamble of our Constitution: We want to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity The Preamble put forth some fine and noble goals. What we are talking about here is our domestic tranquility and general welfare. Living within our means seems to be abandoned. “Budget? What’s a budget?” Certainly the bureaucrats we have elected don’t seem to think “living within our means” is necessary. Those who admire these bureaucrats do the same thing their hero bureaucrats do. Our country has gone astray, wanting more than we can afford. We wanted a more expensive house than we could afford. The result is home foreclosures. We are loosing it all… Our goal should be to live within our means. Simple. Ben Franklin knew.

t brandt
11/9/2010 6:22:41 AM
Why do we need a national goaLl at all? Society has gotten too big. Our "leaders" in DC have no concept of what goes on in the lives of common Americans (much less the average human in the rest of the world) but they purport to know what's best for us. In regards to conservation: theory is nice, but the mathematicians tell us via analysis of "The Prisoners' Dilemma" that in practice, the best survival technique is to cheat a certain percentage of the time. If you try to live by "what's right" when you live among scoundrels, you lose every time. One cannot stop the rising tide, so building a wall is futile. Better to build a boat to adapt to the rising tide. Those of us who already live with less are already adapted to the coming Dark Ages. It's time to do the Noah thing. BTW-- what's a "cubit?"

glen_1
11/5/2010 4:18:33 PM
You asked what is our goal today? Well that is a tricky question, for most these days it seems to be to try to hold onto what they have now be it job, home or lifestyle as the economic crunch plays itself out. This is an ideal time for people to realize that they should work towards living within thier means rather than doing what caused this downturn. This is a great time to start growing our own food driving less or even working out a way to scale back on what we have now that is increasingly costly to keep. On my homefront that has meant putting in high eff. appliances, CFL bulbs throughout and increasing the insulation in the house. I have also built a greenhouse to increase my growing season as well as turning a new garden to increase my food yeld. I have also built a composter to funnel most food waste. We sold our second car a few years back and only opperate one now. As for driving we have scaled back to less than 5000 miles a year. the food we buy we try to minimize packaging by buying larger portions and storing divided portions in reusable containers. There are many other things we have done and many more that we plan to do in the near future. By taking these steps around here we have been able to live better while spending less. The list of things that have or can be done are long. Hope this gives a little insight to our own personal direction. P.S. As a household of 5 we live in 1000 Sqft. have electric usage under 700 KWh a month on grid. Glen

Craig Vetter
11/5/2010 2:50:16 PM
Hi Glen: Pres Kennedy galvanized our generation with the goal of putting a man on the moon in 10 years. It seemed noble and worthwhile. What is our goal today? What is your goal today? (are they the same?) MEN readers: What do you think our goal should be? Craig

glen_1
11/5/2010 2:42:19 PM
....Cont. To address the post from Abbey, in the "Dark Ages" at least there wasn't the wasteful consummerism that is rampant today. The scurge called plastic did not exsist and food was a precious item so almost nothing was wasted. Our modern society could actually learn a thing or two about the stewardship of the resources we have. The "Dark Ages" actually are now being reconsidered to be not dark at all. A return to the Dark Ages isn't necissary but to some it would be far more ideal than where we are heading. We have the technology to make these changes and to live a better cleaner lifestyle. Where we lack is putting this into effect. Some say that it would be too hard/costly to do this yet I can say with certain knowledge that it can happen in a matter of months and not years. To prove my point take a look at how long it took for U.S.A. to change from peacetime to war production in World War 2. The sweeping changes could save us all from the precarious path we are currently on. If we were to take the innovative ideas and practices from W.W.2, the Great Depression and even the Dark ages we could live better,cleaner and more sustainable. So it all boils down to how to change the populous to want these changes now and not tomorrow. Glen

glen_1
11/5/2010 2:02:38 PM
Hey Craig, Glad to read you post. I have to agree with the email you recieved from the European, so many Americans (Canadians too) are far too wasteful with just about everything they touch. The cars are too big/too many for the size of the family the same goes for homes. Each person wastes at minimum thier weight in tossed food (given the obesity of the populous) and that doesn't include all the other trash generated. Now all of this wastefulness really piles up litterally (yes that is misspelled). Having said that there are some people that do make a concious effort to curb this and that is a slowly growing number. I recall a story of a family in Washington state that made news by only throwing out 1 bag of garbage not a week or a month but in a year! They lived in an earthship made of tires and if I recall they also had several other innovative systems in place to minimize their footprint. In Europe cars with engines less than 1 liter displacement are quite common. Germany has one of the best recycling programs in the world that I know of, they divert as much as 70% of waste from landfill. European cities and villages are set up so car use is minimal. Cont....










Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.