Giving Up Television, Agricultural Pesticides and Bee Hive Protection

This short series of reports includes news on giving up television, agricultural pesticides and bee hive protection.
May/June 1986
Add to My MSN

According to a recent issue of Science News , an EPA-funded study indicates that "there is a link between exposure to poisonous doses of agricultural pesticides known as organophosphates and a number of neuropsychological problems, including depression, irritability, and difficulty in thinking, memory, and communication."

Content Tools

Here are the latest reports on homestead news, including the National Alliance of Homebased Businesswomen, agricultural pesticides, Chippewa ban lead shot, Community Environmental Legal Services, and bee hive protection. 

Home Businesses Rule

The National Alliance of Homebased Businesswomen (NAHB) has developed a model zoning ordinance for home businesses. The model is designed to allow home businesses the same privileges as other businesses while protecting the residential character of a neighborhood. Send $2.00 to NAHB, Midland Park, NJ, for a copy of the ordinance.

Sans Television Tube

The Committee on Nationwide Television Audience Measurement has noted an increase in the percentage of American households without a television. The number of telly-less homes increased from 2.9% in 1982 to 4.3% today.

Bad Agricultural News

According to a recent issue of Science News , an EPA-funded study indicates that "there is a link between exposure to poisonous doses of agricultural pesticides known as organophosphates and a number of neuropsychological problems, including depression, irritability, and difficulty in thinking, memory, and communication." Organophosphates have been widely used for decades; a particularly toxic oneparathionis thought to be responsible for half of all pesticide poisonings in the world today.

More Bad Agricultural News

Despite the poisonings — of both humans and the environment — pesticide use is often promoted by aid agencies and governments of developing countries that provide chemical subsidies to farmers. A study by the World Resources Institute has found that hundreds of millions of dollars are spent annually to subsidize the sale of pesticides to growers in developing nations. When the cost of using the dangerous chemicals is heavily discounted, farmers choose them over more laborintensive, but environmentally safer, methods of pest control.

Good Environmental News

There is an increasing awareness of the harm caused by environmentally detrimental "aid" to developing countries. Legislation passed late in 1985 requires U.S. representatives to the World Bank and three other development banks to work for environmental reforms in the banks' lending policies. Science News magazine reports that the U.S. executive directors of these banks must now actively promote such practices as "the hiring of more professionally trained staff to identify potential ecological impacts of projects up for funding, the involvement of conservation groups and native-peoples' organizations in the planning of environmentally sensitive projects, and more funding of `environmentally beneficial' projects such as agroforestry, integrated pest management, and rural solar energy systems."


Circumcision Services, Inc. has opened a clinic in Houston for the sole purpose of circumsising male infants. Special Delivery (a newsletter of Informed Homebirth, Inc. and Informed Birth and Parenting, Inc.) reports that the clinic is advertised in a brochure distributed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in a gift pack given to new mothers. How interesting. In a 1978 statement of policy, the ACOG supported the American Academy of Pediatricians' position that "there is no absolute medical indication for routine circumcision of the newborn."

Chippewa Ban Lead Shot

The Chippewa have voted to ban the use of lead shot by tribal members hunting waterfowl during their of reservation treaty hunts in northern Wisconsin. Lead pellets lying on shallow lake and river bottoms are picked up by feeding ducks, geese, and other waterfowl and cause lead poisoning. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimates that two to three million ducks in this country die from the effects of lead each year. Eagles and other scavenger birds are also poisoned when they feed on the lead-contaminated waterfowl.

Tired of the decades-long debate over the use of lead shot, the Chippewa have decided to "lead the way in achieving a nontoxic method for hunting waterfowl." (A detailed article about this problem, and a comparison of lead and steel shot, can be found in MOTHER EARTH NEWS NO. 79.)

CELS Legal Help

The Environmental Task Force has initiated Community Environmental Legal Services (CELS), a national publicinterest law firm that will provide free legal assistance to grass roots groups and concerned citizens. If you need legal support for an environmental problem in your community, write to CELS, Washington, DC.

Bee Hive Protection

Some wood preservatives, when used on beehives, decrease bees' survival rates and contaminate the honey and beeswax. But scientists with the USDA now consider three preservatives — copper napthenate, acid copper chromate, and copper-9-quinolinolate — safe for use on beehives. Pentachlorophenol (PCP), chromated copper arsenate (CCA), and tributyl tin oxide (TBTO) are not safe for hive use. One USDA entomologist says wood preservatives can extend the useful life of a hive to 20 years or longer, but he cautions that "all wood preservatives are pesticides and should be used judiciously."

Previous | 1 | 2 | Next

Post a comment below.


Charles Giltner
11/14/2012 6:18:34 PM
The use of treated wood would seem to be contraindicated for beehives since as it states that all preservatives are pesticides and as such are toxic to insects of all sorts. I would, from common sense think that the perfect preservative for a beehive construction would be the bee's wax itself. Wood has from time in memorium has been preserved with wax of all sorts so it would seem natural to use that wax which the bee's themselves produce. Only if the bee's were to reject the wax for some reason such as that from another queen's hive or some other reason unknown would reject the hive altogether. Surely the use of bee's wax would even in this circumstance become less offensive to the bee's over time and much preferred over these toxic chemical treatments to the wood. Just sayin' Thanks USDA (sic)

Subscribe Today!

Pay Now & Save 67% Off the Cover Price

(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here