Nature and Environment

Because at 160,000 years, the party is just getting started.

Add to My MSN

Comment on the Gray Wolf's Status

10/28/2008 4:46:13 PM

Tags: gray wolf, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species, Northern Rockies


Gray Wolf Montana   

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) announced today that it is reopening the public comment period on the 2007 proposal to delist the gray wolf in the northern Rocky Mountains from the Endangered Species List. The public has until November 28, 2008 to submit comments.

The Northern Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery Plan started in 1987. The Recovery Plan committee did not believe the wolves would naturally reestablish themselves in the Yellowstone ecosystem. The committee proposed the transplantation of healthy wolves to the area to increase and aid the recovery of the wolf population, something the 1982 Amendment to the Endangered Species Act allowed.

There are two ways to submit a comment on the proposal to delist the gray wolf: through the Federal eRuling Portal at or through the U.S. mail to: Public Comments Processing, Attn:  RIN 1018-Au53; Division of Policy and Directives Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 222; Arlington, VA  22203. E-mails and faxes are not accepted.

The affected areas are all of Montana, Idaho and Wyoming, the eastern one-third of Washington and Oregon and parts of north-central Utah, although FWS welcomes comments from the public of all states and regions.

Minimum recovery goals of 30 breeding pairs and 300 wolves for three consecutive years have been met and retained since 2002.

Some livestock owners argue for taking the gray wolves off the Endangered Species List because the increased wolf population has depleted livestock.

FWS’s September 2008 estimates said there were 1,463 gray wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains and 172 depredating wolves were killed. The Service also estimated that wolves killed 170 cattle, 244 sheep, 10 dogs and 6 llamas.

Defenders of Wildlife president Rodger Schlickeisen disagrees with delisting the gray wolf. “The Fish and Wildlife Service is merely repackaging a severely flawed rule instead of taking a fresh look at the management of wolves in the region,” Schlickeisen said. “The original proposal allows around 1,000 wolves to be killed as soon as they lose the protections of the Endangered Species Act – slashing the population by as much as two thirds.” 

Wolves play a key role in ecosystems. This predator typically preys on young or elderly and injured or sick animals. By controlling the population of large herbivores such as deer and elk, wolves help maintain biodiversity. If elk and deer overgraze, they destroy the plant base, which makes the area less habitable to other species.

Related Content

Gray Wolves: Endangered or Not?

The Bush administration is removing gray wolves from the Endangered Species List, but environmentali...

Friend or Wolf?

Watch Dogs That Changed the World on PBS this Sunday to learn more about where or what your beloved ...

Get Off the Couch: It's July!!

Children have gotten lazy, and it's not getting better as technology keeps advancing, making it easi...

Earth Gauge Tip of the Week: Lose the Lead Sinkers

Tip for avoiding lead sinkers when ice fishing.

Content Tools

Post a comment below.


Eric Botley
11/20/2008 11:27:21 AM
Continued preservation is not what is needed, but monitored and managed conservation (i.e. limited harvest). The habitat has changed to the point that if the wolf population continues unchecked the result will potentially be greater than the original depletion of wolves (the ramifications will not be isolated to the wolf population). When we lead solely with our emotions, folks, we turn blindly away from the realities with which responsible people must wrestle.

Madonna Barnard
11/11/2008 10:16:20 AM
Wolves should remain on the list. Wolves are a necessary part of the ecosystem. Because we tampered with the wolves existence once before, we had to bring them back from the edge of extinction and reintroduce them to areas that had been out of balance without them (see Yellowstone Park). How many times do we have to go through this cycle before anyone figures this out??? Or is this just a matter of job security for somebody?

Kathy Bouwens
11/11/2008 9:39:28 AM
Wolves are a great part of this country's ecological and spiritual history. They need our help to survive. Every time a species dies, so does a part of us. I understand the farmers' plight, but, unlike man, wolves will not kill needlessly but kill to survive.

11/11/2008 1:46:47 AM
Is the world insane? Of course, they should remain on the list! When will people realize we are all connected, and should stay that way or lose who we are fundamentally. We must make better choices regarding our wildlife or there will be no life.

11/10/2008 9:03:53 PM
"What is man without beasts? If all the beasts were gone man would die from a great loneliness of spirit. For whatever happens to beasts soon happens to man. All things are connected" -Chief Seattle That's all I have to say...other than no, they shouldn't be removed from the list.

Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.