Without the Keystone pipeline, vast amounts of tar sands will stay in the ground, preventing the release of the “carbon bomb” that would make devastating climate disruption unavoidable.
Opponents of the Keystone Pipeline claim that, without Keystone, development of tar sands will be very difficult and much of the dirty crude will stay in the ground.
Photo by Fotolia/Calin Tatu
Reports from industry analysts this week made it clear that limited pipeline capacity and a fluctuating market are likely to impede expansion of the tar sands industry. According to the Financial Post, “the high cost of doing business in Alberta’s oil sands” is making many investors wary of investing in tar sands. Many companies are being forced to assess whether or not it’s worth making investments in tar sands that may not be profitable due to the increased costs associated with mining and processing the oil.
This increase in costs is a strong indicator that without the ability to cheaply transport their tar sands to market through the Keystone pipeline, it will be much more difficult for energy companies to further develop tar sands oil. In fact, The Globe and Mail reports, “a ‘no’ from Mr. Obama on Keystone would reduce expected capital spending in the oil sands by estimated $8-billion to $10-billion.”
Pipeline supporters frequently argue that development of tar sands is inevitable whether the Keystone pipeline is built or not, a claim that was also adopted by the State Department in its deeply flawed analysis of the project. But these recent reports confirm what Canadian government and industry officials have been saying all along: Without the Keystone pipeline, vast amounts of tar sands will stay in the ground, preventing the release of the “carbon bomb” that would make devastating climate disruption unavoidable.
In light of the industry’s dwindling prospects, TransCanada is showing increasing desperation to gain approval for Keystone. The Financial Times reported this week that TransCanada and the province of Alberta have invested heavily in a staff of lobbyists and communications professionals with connections to the Obama administration and Secretary John Kerry, in hopes that these connections will help them push the administration to approve the pipeline. Watchdog organizations like the Sunlight Foundation, as well as many environmentalists, have cried foul play. Ross Hammond, of Friends of the Earth, was critical of the industry’s attempt to manipulate the Obama administration: “No one can deny that this kind of influence trading is not in the national interest when it could sway a decision that is bad for the planet and bad for the country.”
Quotes of the Week:
In Case You Missed It:
Discover a dazzling array of workshops and lectures designed to get you further down the path to independence and self-reliance.LEARN MORE