Learn About Global Warming with These Reliable Resources

Do you have questions about climate change? Find out where you can learn more and keep up with the latest science and news.


| December 2, 2009



About global warming

Global warming has been all over the news lately, and that doesn't seem likely to change anytime soon. Keeping up with the latest information can be a challenge.


ISTOCKPHOTO/LILLI DAY

If you have questions about global warming, or are trying to keep up with the news on this issue, it can be a bit overwhelming. That’s because there’s a lot going on! Not only is new scientific research coming out all the time, but there’s a lot of political action now, too — including new climate legislation being considered in the United States and around the world in the wake of the United Nations climate summit in Copenhagen. It adds up to a barrage of news, information and opinions about global warming.

To help make sense of it all, we’ve put together this roundup of reliable resources for learning about climate change, including the causes, effects and possible solutions to this global problem. Whether you’re looking for answers to specific questions, or just trying to keep up with the latest news, here are a few interesting and useful resources to know about.

Global Warming Science

Obviously, not everyone agrees about the causes and effects of global warming. In addition to the climate skeptics who question that human-caused global warming even exists, there are also scientists who argue that the official statements on climate change are far too conservative and the actual impacts will be much worse than anticipated. However, there is information that a majority of climate scientists agree on.

To start with, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has a brief and helpful summary that spells out what’s known, what’s very likely and what scientists are still unsure about. Here’s the EPA’s quick summary of the state of knowledge on climate change. This information is based on the 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world’s leading body for the scientific assessment of climate change. For more in-depth info, you can find the original IPCC report here, or check out the IPCC’s list of climate FAQ.

Effects of Global Warming in Your Backyard

Climate change has different effects in different regions, and you may be wondering how it will affect your part of the world. For example, can your state or region expect to get less rainfall or more? How will that affect farms, gardens and wildlife in your area? Is your location threatened by sea level rise?

If you’re from the United States, you can find answers to many of these questions in a government report that came out in June 2009 called Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. Here’s a link to the key findings, a link to the agriculture section of the report and a map where you can check out the regional impacts of climate change.

robertdotjohnson
11/29/2010 12:54:00 AM

An educated public is esential to democracy: http://climate.noaa.gov/index.jsp?pg=/education/edu_index.jsp&edu=literacy


robertdotjohnson
12/13/2009 9:48:40 PM

Here is another article on climategate: http://www.politifact.org/truth-o-meter/article/2009/dec/11/climate-change-e-mails-and-copenhagen/ Robert Johnson.


robertdotjohnson
12/12/2009 1:59:36 AM

Here is some info about climate change. http://americasclimatechoices.org/ http://www.aps.org/about/pressreleases/climatechange08.cfm http://www.agu.org/sci_pol/positions/climate_change2008.shtml http://www.ametsoc.org/POLICY/2007climatechange.html http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/stateofknowledge.html http://www.globalchange.gov/ http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703819904574551303527570212.html#articleTabs%3Darticle http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/ http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=11676 The IPCC is a scientific group. Some of scientist names are listed here: http://www.ipcc-wg1.unibe.ch/publications/wg1-ar4/ar4-wg1-annexes.pdf Robert Johnson.


mother chris
12/7/2009 11:30:06 AM

I was so irritated when I saw this article on the MEN newsletter. With all the "new" news about fraud, you would think it would me a non-subject. I am a subscriber because I believe we as individuals should aim to be the best stewards of our world as we can be. We shouldn't allow governments to control our actions, no matter what the (failed!) supposed experts are screaming. I am very heartened to see the comments so far, apparently I am not the only one who sees thru the hype and still subscribes to MEN. Please, drop the "earth is warming, we are going to die" myth, and just give us real information, useful to individuals in our own back yard. Leave the showmanship and dire consequences to AlGore and his overpaid, under/over-educated, irresponsible hacks.


sandra dyer
12/7/2009 11:29:47 AM

Man made global warming is a hoax perpetuated by politicians like Al Gore who are using it get rich and gain power. Guys like Michael Mann have destroyed the credibility of the entire scientific community. All I can believe is what I can see for myself - and it just snowed here in Georgia and we never see snow before January. What does that tell you?


tom roberts
12/7/2009 9:16:41 AM

I believe what is being lost in all the debates regarding global warming and the recent effect mankind is having, is that mankind's contribution to global warming is such a miniscule amount compared to the magnitude of natural warming following glaciation. NO ONE can regulate that. Kinda like trying to stop a charging elephant with a BB gun.


rick kennerly
12/7/2009 8:06:16 AM

Also Scientific American has a good podcast/article John Rennie's 7 Answers to Climate Contrarian Nonsense http://preview.tinyurl.com/yc67lmt


rick kennerly
12/7/2009 7:45:43 AM

http://www.realclimate.org/ You should add Real Climate. It's where real climatologist hang out.


amy_7
12/5/2009 9:27:20 PM

Here in the Houston area we broke two records yesterday: The earliest snow ever recorded, and the 1st time in recorded history that it has snowed 2 years in a row. We usually see snow once every 10-15 years. We have now seen snow 3 times in five years. We in Houston are not concerned with global warming. Enough already. It is a fraud.Why isn't it being reported on the major news networks????


tom roberts
12/5/2009 8:28:55 PM

...CONTINUING (comment was truncated by misdirected keyboard stroke) if we were placed in a position of being in the beginning of the last Pleistocene glaciation, then everybody could panic over GLOBAL COOLING, "what will we do, what will we do??


tom roberts
12/5/2009 8:24:59 PM

I agree 100% with Pat. As analogies, meteorologists look at the trees, climatologists look at the forest, but geologists look at the whole earth. With that in mind, there have been hundreds of documented glacial cycles of cooling AND WARMING as evidenced in the geological record. We are now in the warming phase of the last glacial cycle commencing approx. 10,000 years ago. Put oneself in the time frame preceding the last Pleistocene glacial cycle, and


t brandt
12/5/2009 12:34:16 PM

-Anybody with any knowledge of history or science already saw thru the faulty "hockey stick" graph of Michael (Piltdown) Mann. Now, thanks to the release of their e-mails we have the computer code fudge factors they used to produce it, and confessions as to how they used their influence to keep good research out of the journals. -The whole concept of AGW was just a ploy by the third world UN to force industrial nations togive up wealth to developing nations. The tentative Copenhagen Agreement is basically a document imposing a world govt on us. If you think this is just a paranoid rant, try reading the document.


aaron t
12/3/2009 1:45:40 PM

Since climate change (natural phenomenon) and global warming (man-made phenomenon) have been so intertwined in public speech, it's hard to read any real science. First off, don't read anything the IPCC puts out. That's a governmental body, not a scientific one. They've used questionable data and unreviewed information. Such as the graph from Wikipedia that appeared (and was later removed when it was exposed) in the very report this article points to. Read about that here: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/26/united-nations-environment-programme-uses-unreviewed-graph-from-an-anonymous-wikipedia-author-for-official-report/ If you're confused about how the science vs. politics is playing out with Climategate, read a great summary of what's happened so far with Climategate here: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/Monckton-Caught%20Green-Handed%20Climategate%20Scandal.pdf And also know that Al Gore just announced he's canceling his appearance in Copenhagen. I'd suggest the others going there do the same and call it a wash. Even the pro-AGW scientists are saying the meeting will produce nothing useful.


pat miketinac
12/2/2009 9:41:08 PM

Now that the global warming fraud has been exposed, why is this topic here?






dairy goat

MOTHER EARTH NEWS FAIR

Aug. 5-6, 2017
Albany, Ore.

Discover a dazzling array of workshops and lectures designed to get you further down the path to independence and self-reliance.

LEARN MORE