Nature and Environment

Because at 160,000 years, the party is just getting started.

Climate Change and the World's Future Fuel Choice

10/17/2011 7:59:27 AM

Tags: World's increasing demand for electricity, conventional vs renewable sources, acid rain, Richard Hilderman

Electrical consumption in both the United States and the world has doubled since 1980 and it is also expected to double again by 2030. Needless to say, to meet this demand we will need to create new electrical generating power plants. The cost to build these new plants is estimated at 14 trillion dollars (Daniel Yergin, The Quest, p. 396). 

Before we start creating these new power plants we must decide what will be the fuel of choice for these new plants. The fuel choice boils down to continue using fossil fuel and nuclear power or converting to non-carbon base renewable sources such as wind, solar, hydroelectric or geothermal. This is a critical issue because these new plants can operate for 60 to 70 years. Thus, once they are built we will be stuck using that fuel for a long time! 

 

Renewable Electricity Sources 

 

Shouldn’t we consider making a major shift from fossil fuel to non-carbon based renewable energy sources?  Currently the United States generates 45 percent of its electricity from coal-fired plants, 23 percent from natural gas, 20 percent from nuclear, 7 percent from hydropower, 2 percent from wind and 1 percent from oil. (U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Statistics, 2009). The United States has significant resources in wind, solar and geothermal to meet all of its electrical needs several times over (see my posting entitled The Cost of Climate Change). 

Some people argue that natural gas is the fuel choice for future due to its abundance and it is cleaner to burn than coal along with the fact that natural gas generates about half the amount of carbon dioxide per unit of electricity as coal. It is true that natural gas doesn’t emit the pollutants that are human health hazards that coal emits. However, natural gas does emit carbon dioxide! Even though natural gas emits half the amount of carbon dioxide as coal this carbon dioxide will continue to enhance climate change as the demand for electricity increases.  

People also argue that renewables are not competitive with conventional energy. It is true that electricity generated by renewables is currently more expense than conventional energy sources.  However, recent research and development on renewables is starting to lower the cost of electricity generated by these sources. In addition, a price on carbon in the form of a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade system would make renewables more competitive with the conventional energy sources and also stimulate the conversion of conventional sources to renewable sources. An example of how cap-and-trade can be used to solve an environmental problem is acid rain. Acid rain occurs when sulfur dioxide, which is emitted into the atmosphere by coal burning power plants, reacts with moisture in the atmosphere to produce sulfuric acid. Acid rain damages forests and acidifies lakes killing fish and corroding buildings. In 1990, a cap-and-trade system to reduce acid rain was enacted in the United States. By 2008 sulfur dioxide emissions had been reduced to almost 60 per cent from the 1980 level (Environmental Protection Agency, Acid Rain and Related Programs: 2008 Highlights, December 2009).

The conversion to renewable energy sources will not occur overnight because history has demonstrated energy transitions takes several decades. This conversion will require significantly more investments by capital venture companies and energy companies along with research and developed funds from the federal government. The time for action is now, not in 2030!

Photo by Fotolia/Thaut Images 

 



Related Content

States Achieve 25 Percent Renewable Energy With Wind Power

Defying conventional wisdom about the limits of wind power, in 2012 both Iowa and South Dakota gener...

Filtering Radioactive Particles From Water

Water filter supplier offers recommendations to avoid radiation contamination following the Fukushim...

Protecting Your Rainwater Tank With Painted Bed Sheets

To prevent algae growth deterioration by sun damage to a plastic rainwater tank, cover it with a pai...

The Generation Fresh Movement Celebrates Home Cooking

McCormick pumps up flavor and encourages healthy changes.

Content Tools
RSS




Post a comment below.

 

Jon Flatley
2/13/2012 3:09:11 PM
These are quality posts in this blog, however it's been awhile since the last one. I'd like to see more frequency as they are informative and well written!

Kevin Haendiges
1/10/2012 4:40:32 AM
Cap and trade is a sham whose only purpose is to make renewables competitive by making their competition unfairly expensive by comparison. It's a weaselly way to promote renewables at best, and one that the general public will never accept. Renewables, for the time being, are not a viable option until breakthroughs that make them competitive in a fair market are found. None of them currently show any sign of even making a reasonable profit, especially when the cost of converting the entire energy infrastructure is cnsidered. Instead of focusing on pipe dreams of energy sources that are decades from producing realistic energy at reasonable cost our money, especially taxpayer monies, would be much better spent finding ways to use existing fuels more efficiently and cleanly. Cleaner use of fossil fuels will be more likely than renewables for at least the foreseeable future. One day wind and solar may replace coal and NG, but don't bet on it happening within your lifetime.

ROBERT JOHNSON
12/7/2011 12:33:52 PM
a global increase over a century is the definition of climate, it's not weather. Weather is from day to day. The temperature and CO2 has been stable through the Holocene period actually on a downward trend until man came along. Recent increases are caused by man's polluting of the atmosphere. It is now warmer than the medieval warm period. CO2 is higher than hundreds of thousands years ago.

T BRANDT
12/6/2011 12:03:57 AM
That's weather. The climate has remained unchanged. The temps today are the same as they were 300 yrs ago. In between there, we had The Little Ice Age. We're just warming back up after that. If you go back 7000 yrs to the Holocene Optimum, we had temps 6deg higher than now. We've been generally cooling off since then and we're ultimately headed for another glaciated Ice Age.

ROBERT JOHNSON
12/5/2011 11:17:17 PM
the temperature has increased 1.4 F over the last century

JOHN & VIRGINIA LEDOUX
11/11/2011 10:25:17 PM
What climate change?

MY COMMUNITY









Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.