Take Action: Tell the EPA Not to Register Sulfoxaflor, Another Bee-Killing Pesticide

With continuing reports of honey-bee decline, would sulfoxaflor be yet another bee disaster waiting to happen?
From Beyond Pesticides
February 6, 2013

Take action to protect our pollinators from toxic pesticides.
Photo from Fotolia/Diana Mower


Content Tools

Related Content

Is Your Baby Eating Food That Contains Honey?

Reading label ingredients is a must for your baby's health.

Endosulfan Canceled After Research Finds Hazards to Humans and Wildlife

The EPA moves to end the use of the pesticide endosulfan after research finds it is toxic to wildlif...

MOTHER EARTH NEWS Starts Beekeeping

Our office was abuzz with bee activity this morning! We received four packages of bees today before ...

The EPA Bans the Pesticides Dursban and Lorsban

The EPA bans the pesticides Dursban and Lorsban, two of the most widely used pesticides in the U.S. ...

The following article is posted with permission from Beyond Pesticide.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to register a new insecticide, sulfoxaflor, which the agency has classified as “very highly toxic” to honey bees. Despite efforts underway in Europe to protect bee populations, and continued warnings from beekeepers, EPA is poised to allow another chemical toxic to bees into the environment without proper field studies evaluating long-term effects to bee colonies and with label statements that are impractical and unenforceable. With continuing reports of bee deaths, would sulfoxaflor be yet another bee disaster waiting to happen?

Take Action! Tell EPA not to register another bee-killing pesticide! 

See sample comments below. If you are having trouble submitting comments to the docket, click here

Similar to the neonicotinoid clothianidin, which is linked to bee decline and was conditionally registered by EPA without pertinent studies on the hazards to honey bees, the agency is once again poised to register a chemical known to be highly toxic to honey bees, without relevant field studies assessing colony health and the magnitude of residue exposures. Honey bees can be exposed to sulfoxaflor via nectar and pollen with estimated residues exceeding levels of concern. Effects in honey bees will be similar to those observed with neonicotinoids, including abnormal flight and olfactory behavior, and death.

In spite of sulfoxaflor’s many similarities with neonicotinoids (some say it’s a new generation of neonicotinoid), EPA turns a blind eye to taking the precautionary approach.  It is irresponsible for EPA to repeat the missteps of conditional registration with another chemical known to be hazardous to bees. The time is now to say enough is enough and demand EPA protect honey bees and other pollinators.

Join us in submitting a public comment to EPA now! 

Sample Comment

To the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 

I am writing to express concern regarding the proposed conditional registration of the new pesticide active ingredient, sulfoxaflor. This chemical is highly toxic to honey bees and its use will compound the already growing problem of bee decline. There are many aspects of EPA’s risk assessment for sulfoxaflor that I find troubling and which I believe should disqualify this chemical from being granted conditional registration. 

Sulfoxaflor is highly toxic to bees according to EPA, and there are still outstanding ecological data regarding honey bees, including field studies for assessing colony heath. Given the global phenomenon of bee population decline and the recent precautions taken in the European Union to protect bee health with the pending suspension of certain pesticides known to elicit adverse effects in bees, it is irresponsible that the agency would allow yet another chemical with a high potential to be hazardous to bee health into the environment, with unknown risks. 

With continuing reports of bee deaths, I am concerned that sulfoxaflor may create yet another bee calamity. I urge the agency to protect honeybees and reject the pending registration for sulfoxaflor. 

Thank you, 

Your_Name 

Click here to submit your comment to EPA now! Please consider revising the comment with your own opinions, beliefs, or ideas. Personalized letters have a much greater impact! 

Read the full article on Beyond Pesticide'sDaily News Blog.


Previous | 1 | 2 | Next






Post a comment below.

 








Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.