Natural Health

Healthy living, herbal remedies and DIY natural beauty.

Add to My MSN

Air Near Factory Farms Dirtier Than Most Polluted Cities, Study Finds

3/10/2011 4:29:57 PM

Tags: Environmental Ingegrity Project, concentrated animal feeding operations, livestock pollution, Environmental Protection Agency, CAFOs, Robyn Griggs Lawrence

Robyn Griggs Lawrence thumbnailThe air at some factory farm test sites in the United States is dirtier than in America’s most polluted cities and exposes workers to pollutant concentrations far above occupational safety guidelines, according to a new report from the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP). The pollution levels are high enough to suggest that those living near massive livestock operations also may be at risk. Estimated emission levels for some pollutants were higher at some test sites than amounts reported by large industrial plants.

The EIP report calls for reversal of a 2008 Bush Administration deal that gave concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) amnesty from federal pollution reporting rules. Many CAFOs pollute in quantities large enough to trigger emission reporting laws, and Clean Air Act protections may be warranted to protect rural citizens, the EIP states.

“No other major industry in the U.S. would be permitted to pollute at these levels without EPA oversight,”said attorney and report author Tarah Heinzen. “Our findings indicate that citizens near factory farms may be breathing unsafe levels of small particle pollution, ammonia and other toxic gases, and that EPA's failure to regulate air pollution from these operations may threaten public health. It is time for EPA to overturn the Bush Administration’s backroom deals with the factory farm industry and begin applying consistent federal standards to all major polluters.”

Among the EIP report’s key findings:

*The EPA/industry study measured levels of particle pollution—which can damage lungs and heart and cause premature death—well above Clean Air Act health-based limits at some sites. Fine particle pollution was much higher than the federal 24-hour exposure limit on the worst days at 6 of 15 study sites, including 5 poultry operations in California, Indiana, and North Carolina, and a Washington dairy. Peak 24-hour exposures at two henhouses in California and one in Indiana were more than three times higher than EPA’s 35 microgram standard.

* Based on sampling results, 11 of 14 CAFOs in the study emit more than 100 pounds of ammonia—which can damage the respiratory system and is life-threatening at high concentrations—on average days, which triggers pollution reporting requirements for non-livestock industries. Some CAFOs emitted thousands of pounds on their worst days. These include hog CAFOs in Indiana, Iowa, Oklahoma and North Carolina, dairies in Indiana, Washington and Wisconsin, and egg layer or broiler chicken facilities in California, Indiana and North Carolina.

* Some large hog and dairy CAFOs release more than 100 pounds of hydrogen sulfide--which causes respiratory symptoms, damages the eyes, and is fatal at high concentrations. Texas has established an enforceable air quality standard of 80 parts per billion of hydrogen sulfide averaged over half an hour. The air around seven hog and dairy sites – nearly half of the confinements studied – exceeded this level for entire days during the study. Long-term ambient levels of hydrogen sulfide were also significantly higher than EPA’s reference concentration of 1 ppb at most study sites.”

cows 

Lots of cows mean lots of pollution. iStock photo



Related Content

Record CO2 Emissions from Power Plants: How Does Your State Rate?

Last year saw the biggest jump in CO2 emissions from power plants ever. Texas, Florida and Ohio lead...

Support Clean Water and Solar Energy—Without Leaving Your Desk

The World Community Grid uses grid technology and idle computers to power environmental and humanita...

Swine Flu: Scary but Avoidable?

Swine flu may or may not be the pandemic that cable newscasters are proclaiming - but why take chanc...

More Deaths Tied to Pollution than Car Accidents

Pollution isn't just hurting our environment. It is a bigger cause of death in Southern California t...

Content Tools




Post a comment below.

 

clong
3/11/2011 11:35:12 AM
There are thousands of workers employed by these CAFOs, and the biggest concern is for THEIR health. As the blog above states, the study reported that "workers" are exposed to these high levels every day and citizens "near" the CAFOs "MAY be breathing unsafe levels." We should all be outraged at the ways in which the companies that own these CAFOs treat their workers, and their animals. My family's home is located 3 miles from a cattle CAFO in rural Nebraska, and regardles of what the health hazards may or may not be, the STINK is undeniably profound for MILES around. CAFOs are a form of CHEMICAL TRESPASSING that people living near these facilities should not have to tolerate. No business should have the right to pollute the air (and water) we all have to breathe (and drink). There are so many other reasons why we must stop raising our livestock in these factory "farms" and return to sane, sustainable production systems.

t brandt
3/11/2011 6:03:08 AM
Another tempest in the TreeHuggers' teapot: the sensors for these studues were placed at some specified level a few feet above the feed lots, or inside chicken coops, etc. Had they placed them directly at the bovine anal verge, they would have recorded 100% CH4, H2 & H2S-- OMG! We're all gunna die! There's no oxygen at all! The refuse gases, products of digestion which we all make, are so diluted as they drift away that are of absolutely ZERO concern for health. Extrapolating this data to conclude that the nearby residents are a risk is unsubstantiated and a pure lie. This is just another effort by those with a social agenda to influence how we eat. BTW- eating a diet of rice, berans & corn (all needed to provide complete protein) would require ingesting over 6000 cal/d to provide only 60 gm protein. Eating 500 cal of beef would provide the same protein. We NEED meat to stay healthy. Sorry, socialists. You better get the science right before you try to regulate us into subservience.










Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.