How ‘Ag-Gag’ Laws Undermine Our Food System

Find out how ag-gag laws, which exist in eight U.S. states, are making it harder to ensure food safety and protect against farm animal cruelty.
By Joanna Poncavage
December 2013/January 2014
Add to My MSN

Transparency is often lacking for large-scale livestock operations housed in enclosed barns. Ag-gag laws are only restricting it further.
Photo By Fotolia/Dario Sabljak
Slideshow


Content Tools

Related Content

7 Tips to Reduce Your Cooling Bill This Summer

Air conditioning accounts for as much as 20 percent of the average homeowner's utility bill. These s...

National Alpaca Farm Days - September 24th and 25th

Members of the Alpaca Owners and Breeders Association (AOBA) are inviting the public to visit their ...

Aging and Brain Health: What Have You Been Learning Lately?

Current research indicates that taking on challenging new activities might be one of the best things...

How Bad Is Monsanto?

Corporations continue to purchase interests in seed industries, and Monsanto — the 800-lb. gorilla i...

As public awareness of our unsustainable and inhumane industrial meat production system grows, Big Ag has convinced eight state legislatures to enact a variety of measures known as “ag-gag” laws.

The first of these laws, passed in Kansas in 1990, made it illegal to take photos at an animal facility or animal research lab. More recently, Arkansas made it a crime to get an animal agriculture job under false pretenses. Six other states now have ag-gag laws: Iowa, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, South Carolina and Utah.

Gabe Rottman, legislative counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), says that even more insidious are ag-gag laws that require anyone who records farm animal cruelty or other impropriety to turn the recording over to police within 24 hours. Rottman calls ag-gag laws a curtailment of First Amendment rights, largely because of the effect they have on investigative journalism, but also because they could turn people who become whistle-blowers into criminals.

Investigative journalism can make a real difference within the food system. In 2008, for instance, after an undercover investigation by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) into a dairy cow slaughter plant in California, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) completely shut down the plant. Workers who were abusing animals were charged with criminal cruelty, and the largest food recall in U.S. history based on food safety concerns unfolded. Had ag-gag laws been in place, this outcome likely wouldn’t have been possible.

In April 2013, Utah became the first state to prosecute a violation of its ag-gag law when Amy Meyer was arrested after recording (with a cell phone) a live cow being carried by a bulldozer at the Dale Smith Meatpacking Co. in Draper City. The charges against Meyer were dropped (she was filming from a public easement), but in July 2013, a coalition of journalists and activists filed a civil suit against Utah’s ag-gag law, alleging that it violates First Amendment rights.

Rottman says ag-gag laws have become very high-profile in the past year, and for those concerned about food system transparency, the situation is looking up. In Tennessee in May 2013, Gov. Bill Haslam vetoed a new ag-gag law after an outpouring of public concern. As of August 2013, new ag-gag bills had been defeated in 11 states. In addition to grass-roots campaigns fighting these attempts to hide industrial ag’s secrets, the photos of mistreated animals that tend to appear in media coverage of ag-gag laws only add to public awareness that the meat industry has something to hide.

So, are ag-gag laws backfiring? “We are not convinced they are gone for good, but we are hopeful that the industry and the states considering these bills have witnessed how much negative publicity they tend to garner,” says Amanda Hitt, director of the Government Accountability Project’s Food Integrity Campaign.

Meanwhile, in states that have enacted ag-gag laws, nobody knows much about what’s happening to farm animals, because the organizations that investigate their treatment usually abide by the laws, says Paul Shapiro, vice president of farm animal protection at the HSUS. Because no federal animal welfare laws regulate the treatment of animals while they’re on factory farms, Shapiro adds that undercover investigations and relying on whistle-blowers are the only ways the public can expect evidence of animal cruelty or food safety problems to come out. Some people are starting to get creative in how they attempt to get information, though. In July 2013 in Kansas, for example, a freelance photographer shooting for National Geographic was arrested for trespassing after he parked on private property while taking pictures of an animal feedlot from overhead in a paraglider. Animal rights groups and investigative journalists are reportedly planning to use drones to continue monitoring animal welfare.

Temple Grandin, animal scientist, called ag-gag bills “the stupidest thing that ag ever did” during a talk at a 2012 Iowa Farm Bureau meeting. Public sentiment seems to be shifting toward the same view — and to foster a healthy, safe, abuse-free food system, many people are looking for laws that encourage more transparency, not less.


Previous | 1 | 2 | Next






Post a comment below.

 

RAYW
11/21/2013 7:02:34 AM
Between these Ag-Gag laws and patent infringement lawsuits by Monsanto and Cargill against small farmers it seems there is an all out assault being waged against our First Amendment and Property rights. These companies desire an absolute stranglehold on our food production capabilities and it's beginning to look like they're getting the upper hand and will achieve that goal. Those who control the food control the people and allowing these corporations to monopolize our food production is dangerous.

DruidJo
11/20/2013 8:01:58 AM
This may be a radical idea, but how about humans quit producing so many offspring and then the meat industry will not have as many people to try to feed and may be able to slow. The only way to produce enough food to feed the ever growing population is going to be ugly by necessity. Too many people on the planet to be able to offer the animals the space they need to be comfortable. If you want to preach responsibility start at the foundation and tell humans that it is not ok to reproduce irresponsibly. When we lose farmland to housing it cannot be replaced. So how do we feed the people in that housing that refuse to feed themselves? With inhumane production.








Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.