Green Transportation

Moving toward a transportation system that fuels healthy people and a healthy planet.

Add to My MSN

MAX Update No. 102: The Update Index

7/22/2013 2:24:00 PM

Tags: MAX, 100 MPG, X Prize, Jack McCornack, Oregon

Jack and MAXAs mentioned in MAX Update 100: The Shows Must Go On, the latest blog software eliminated the MAX Update index, which made finding old posts a genuine challenge. To remedy this, I've started an index on my own web site at Kinetic Vehicles, so posts can be located by number, title, or subject.

One reason this is taking me a while is it's so distracting. I search motherearthnews.com for the next post on the list and then read it and...boy, since I'm starting the index at the beginning and working my way up to the now, I haven't seen some of these posts for years, and some of them are a real trip down Memory Lane. And some make me wonder “What was I thinking?” And some claimed “I'll get back to you on that,” and I never did. And one was deliberately evasive.

Ah yes, MAX Update No. 32: Why We Resigned From The Auto X Prize. That was about four years ago, and I still (as recently as last week, in fact) get calls saying “There's got to be more to the story than that,” and yes, there was. I'll touch on two of the reasons not mentioned.

I believe the Progressive Automotive X Prize (as it was eventually named) did some good by getting people thinking about fuel efficient automobiles, but the organizers seemed to lose sight of some of their initial goals. One goal was to dramatically reduce greenhouse gas production (specifically CO2) through dramatically reducing the use of fossil fuel, but that Dramatically drifted down to Better Than Average, and ended up with the only fossil fuel use restriction on electric cars was they couldn't exceed 200 grams of CO2 per mile.

Mind you, they had their reasons for going easy on electric cars, and 200 grams per mile doesn't sound like much, but that's 20 kilograms—44 pounds—of CO2 in a hundred miles. That's more than double the CO2 output of a gallon of gasoline, about double what MAX gets (and 10 times what MAX gets on straight vegetable oil) and when you consider that the majority of the “fuel” they calculated for electric cars was nuclear and hydro, setting the emissions bar at Better Than Average is not impressive. Lots of cars are already better than average (for example, any VW TDI sedan running biodiesel blend is under 200 grams of CO2 per mile) and the X Prize Foundation wouldn't have got much press with “10 Million Dollar Prize Announced for Better Than Average Cars.”

So I wrote them a letter, as a competitor, telling them how I felt about that, and that they'd look ridiculous when my article about the rules hit print...which leads me to Reason Number 2:

When the rules were finally released (more than a year after the entries opened), they included competitor gag rules (“X PRIZE shall have the exclusive right to control and manage any Media Content...all media content arising from or in connection with the Competition, including without limitation...all forms of literary works. Team hereby grants X PRIZE the exclusive right to...the life story and personal experiences of the Team and each Team Member, as related to their participation in the Competition (known as the “Story Rights”). X PRIZE shall have the exclusive, perpetual and worldwide right to Use the Story Rights...X PRIZE shall have the right to edit, dramatize and fictionalize actual events and characters contained in the Story Rights...”) which meant anything I wrote about the competition (excuse me; the Competition) could be rewritten (or simply refused) by X PRIZE before submission to Mother Earth News (or elsewhere). It may be egotistical for me to think I may have brought this on myself with my Pen Is Mightier Than The Sword rants, but I wasn't willing to give up my right to write, so I told them I wouldn't sign their agreement and they gave me my entry fee back.

There were other issues, but that was the clincher. I'm a writer first and a competitor second, so we agreed to disagree, and I agreed to wait for the dust to settle before I mentioned this in print.

But I digress. The MAX Updates Index is coming along, and you can get there in a single click.



Related Content

Wood-Fired Ovens: Is a Barrel Oven for You?

The Barrel Oven is a functional, efficient wood-fired oven with a short pre-heating period.

Three-wheeled Truck Gets 72 mpg

72 mpg for under $6,000! How cool is that? Really, we want to know.

Road Safety for Cyclists

Learn the facts associated with road safety and cyclists, and why it’s still safer to ride a bike th...

Hello Fuel Efficient Cars; Goodbye Gas-Guzzlers

New federal standards will dramatically increase fuel efficiency in cars and light-duty trucks by 20...

Content Tools




Post a comment below.

 

jerryd
7/24/2013 9:53:55 PM

Facts are EV's do far better than 200gms/mile and the Xprize screwed them, not favored them, even completely from coal.  Look at the EPA website on it.

 

Take the 2 seat winner, the Zero Tracer gets the energy equivalent of  330mpg at 100wthrs/mile.  Only by funny math could they come up with the mpg ratings for EV's. The US average utility power is mostly low to no CO2 or very eff, clean NG running 60% eff.  What coal is left are the most clean, eff but they are closing daily.  We have cut coal use by 33%, under 40% of generation now , and the trend is speeding up. By the time any numbers of EV's are out there coal will be around 20% of grid, making it very eff with much of the coal replacement and energy growth taken up by RE on homes, buildings making their own.

 

And most EV people use RE they make or buy or wasted off peak power.  Facts are in the future EV's by modulating their charging or even using the motor inverter to put power back into the grid, V2G,  when needed will save a lot of pollution, enough for the EV's to be CO2 free fuel wise.  Most EV's can run 25 yrs on $1k/1kw of PV now   sunelec   or others.

 

So please don't put EV's down with misinformation just because they compete with you and easily beat you in eff by a larger margin.  Claiming Xprize, and I was going to do it too but didn't for the same rules you stated,  favored EV's in the contest is rather, well we'll leave it at that. 

 

 








Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.