Why We Need Electric Cars

Electric cars promise to bring about a transportation transformation whose time has come.
By Steve Heckeroth
October/November 2006
Add to My MSN

A Ford Escape Hybrid converted to a plug-in hybrid.

Content Tools

We already have the technology we need to cure our addiction to oil, stabilize the climate and maintain our standard of living, all at the same time. By transitioning to sustainable technologies, such as solar and wind power, we can achieve energy independence and stabilize human-induced climate change.

Increasing transportation efficiency is the best place to start efforts to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), which is a primary culprit in global warming. Of all CO2 emissions in the United States, about 33 percent comes from transportation.

Our electric vs. internal combustion engine chart shows the overwhelming advantages of electric cars — plug-in hybrid vehicles and all-electric vehicles (EVs) — over gasoline vehicles. With gasoline-electric hybrid power and all-electric power, we can achieve significant cost and environmental savings. By adding more batteries and recharging capability to gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles, we can have plug-in hybrids that offer the range of hybrids (500 miles or more), plus the benefit of all-electric power for short trips, which dramatically reduces the amount of gasoline used. EVs require no gasoline whatsoever and, when recharged from renewable energy sources, produce zero total emissions.

In fact, even if we switched from gasoline cars to EVs and plug-in hybrids recharged by our existing utility grids (which mostly use fossil fuels), we would see a 42 percent national average reduction in CO2 emissions, according to research by Peter Lilienthal of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

As we approach the peak of world oil extraction and witness the consequences of climate change, it is important to reflect on how the world’s most technologically advanced nation came to base its economy on the use of polluting, finite resources. It is also important to recognize that corporations exist, for the most part, for one reason: to make money. This gives us, the consumer, the ultimate power to shape corporate behavior through how we spend our money.

Sun to Wheel

Transportation efficiency is usually measured without regard for how fuel ends up in the tank, we just assume it will be there. It’s time to develop a better method, one that considers the finite nature of fossil fuels and how their use affects the planet’s ability to support life. Ultimately, almost all energy on Earth comes from the sun, so fuel efficiencies should be measured from sun to wheel.

Fossil fuels are inherently very inefficient because of the hundreds of millions of years of solar energy and the rare geologic events it takes to produce them. About 350,000,000 terawatt (trillion watt) hours of solar energy strike the Earth every year. It took 3.5 billion years of photosynthesis to create world oil reserves that contain about 1,000,000 terawatt hours of energy. Do the math and you will find that using direct solar radiation is about a quadrillion times more efficient than burning fossil fuels. It is long past time to transition from ancient solar energy, aka fossil fuels, to using the solar energy we receive every day.

Biofuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, may help us transition to cleaner vehicles, but let’s not forget that overharvesting has contributed to the decline of many civilizations over the last 10,000 years. For the last 100 years, ever-increasing amounts of soil nutrients and fossil fuels have been consumed to grow and distribute food. As the needs of an increasing population collide with the realities of diminishing soil quality and fossil fuels, growing food will trump growing fuel.

Photosynthesis by plants is a maximum of 1 percent efficient at converting solar energy into carbohydrates. The efficiency of producing biofuels from carbohydrates and then getting refined fuel to vehicles varies from 10 percent to 35 percent, depending on the process and the distance to the use. Then there’s the 10 percent to 20 percent efficiency of the internal-combustion engine and the transmission. So, the sun to wheel efficiency of biofuels is 0.01 percent to 0.07 percent.

Producing electricity from solar energy using photovoltaics (PV) is about 5 percent to 20 percent efficient, and solar-thermal electric generation can be more than 35 percent efficient. Current battery charge/discharge efficiency varies from 80 percent to 95 percent. Electric motors are more than 90 percent efficient. As a result, the sun to wheel efficiency of solar-electric power falls between 3 percent and 30 percent. This gives solar-electric vehicles an advantage 50 to 3,000 times greater than burning biofuels.

Of course, for EVs to truly have zero emissions, the electricity used to charge their batteries must be generated from renewable sources such as the sun or wind. If EVs are charged with electricity generated by nuclear or coal-fired power plants, the true costs will be passed on to future generations. Fortunately, renewables are ready and able to charge EVs and plug-in hybrids.

The Original Vehicle

Inventors first started tinkering with small EVs right after the invention of the electric motor in 1833. But it wasn’t until 1859 that the first rechargeable lead-acid battery made it possible for electric vehicles to be more than a novelty. In 1890, the first golden age of EVs started in Des Moines, Iowa, with William Morrison’s electric car. For the next two decades manufacturers such as General Motors (GM), General Electric, Studebaker, Baker and others raced to create a successor to the horse as the preferred mode of transportation.

At the turn of the century, quiet, clean electric cars out-sold loud, smoke-belching gas cars and were assumed by most to be the way of the future. In 1900, Thomas Edison started work on a new alkaline battery, and by 1909 he was manufacturing nickel iron cells that had almost double the power-to-weight ratio of the lead-acid batteries of the day. Meanwhile, a prerequisite for driving Ford’s gas-powered Model T was the strength to turn the crank to start the engine. It took the invention of the electric starter in 1912 to convince “respectable people” that the elegant silence of EVs was worth giving up for the longer range of gas cars.

Electric street cars and light rail continued to develop as a clean and efficient way to get around until the Great Depression. In the 1920s the oil, auto and tire industries became the most powerful business interests on Earth. In the late ’20s GM, Standard Oil and Firestone lobbied federal and local governments to eliminate public funding for electric rail projects, and supported funding of road building projects. By 1940, this gasoline alliance had succeeded in shifting the emphasis to private transportation. Never mind that rail can be hundreds of times more efficient than idle traffic on the freeway. From a pure profit point of view, this was an effective way of eliminating competition. From a social point of view, it was a sea change that triggered suburban sprawl and a lifestyle that led to our oil addiction.

When the oil embargo hit in 1973, the writing was on the wall. It seemed a national effort to improve battery technology and switch to renewable energy would be the rational next step. After all, domestic oil production had peaked in 1970. Worse yet, a foreign cartel controlled 80 percent of world oil reserves and was becoming a force to be reckoned with. About a dozen new EV manufacturers in the United States and Europe went into limited production, mostly for commercial delivery use.

New Hope for Electric Vehicles

In 1978, the federal gas guzzler tax levied a fee on cars with poor fuel economy and rising gas prices made more efficient foreign cars increasingly popular. For the first time, oil use and oil imports started decreasing in 1979 and through the early ’80s.

Just as it seemed a smooth transition away from oil might be possible, President Reagan took the solar panels off the White House. Instead of staying on course toward a sustainable future, the nation that once prided itself on its independence had slid deeper and deeper into debt to pay for its dependence on foreign oil.

But there were a few bright spots for clean transportation in the ’80s: Stanford Ovshinsky, Paul MacCready and Andrew Frank. Ovshinsky invented the nickel metal hydride battery, which is used in almost all of today’s hybrids and EVs. MacCready initiated a wave of change with a variety of transportation innovations, including the pedal-powered Gossamer Albatross and the solar-powered Solar Challenger. Both flew across the English Channel and captured the imaginations of a new generation of engineers. Professor Frank started working with his students at the University of California at Davis to build what we now call plug-in hybrids. Ovshinsky was named a Hero for the Planet by Time magazine and MacCready was named Engineer of the Century by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Frank’s inventions have not yet received the accolades they deserve, but I think he’ll be one of this century’s heroes because his work will lead to widespread plug-in hybrids.

In 1988, Alec Brooks, an engineer with AeroVironment, Paul MacCready’s research and development firm, sold the idea of developing a prototype EV to middle management at GM. Bob Stempel — who would later take over as GM’s CEO and is now the CEO of ECD Ovonics, the company co-founded by Stan Ovshinsky — was the project’s primary advocate. Brooks headed the prototype team, and Alan Cocconi, another talented engineer at AeroVironment, worked alone on the electronics. The inverters he built would take the car (which would eventually be named the EV1) from zero to 60 mph in eight seconds, provide regenerative braking and act as a battery charger. The Delco Remy division of GM worked on an 850 pound lead-acid battery pack that would give the car a range of 124 miles at 55 mph. The prototype was completed in January of 1990 and got rave reviews at auto shows. It was easily the most efficient car ever built with funding from an American automaker.

After seeing the new possibilities for all-electric cars, the California Air Resource Board announced the Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate in 1990. The mandate was an attempt to restore clean air to the smog-choked state and required that by 1998 at least 2 percent of new cars sold in the state emit zero emissions. The standard would rise to 5 percent by 2001 and 10 percent by 2003. The ZEV mandate spurred technology development around the world and started an epic battle between California and the auto industry.

Automakers Strike Back

Hope for auto industry leadership to solve air pollution problems dimmed when Bob Stempel’s term at GM was cut short, in part because of his support for EVs. The auto industry instead started promoting “passenger trucks” (trucks, vans and SUVs) for several reasons: 1) Trucks were not included in the ZEV mandate. 2) The 1978 gas guzzler tax did not apply to trucks. 3) Trucks did not have to meet the same safety, fuel economy or emission standards as cars, with the heaviest trucks exempt from all standards. 4) Such heavy trucks (Ford Excursion, GM Hummer, etc.) qualified for federal tax credits that essentially made them free to small business owners and those with a large income tax liability.

In 1990, only 4 percent of vehicles sold in the United States were passenger trucks. By 2003, 50 percent of vehicles sold were trucks. For the same period, vehicle fuel economy declined from nearly 30 miles per gallon to about 20 mpg.

Automakers generally need at least three years to bring a new model from concept to production. If they were to be ready with ZEVs to meet the 2 percent mark for the 1998 model year, they would have to start designing them by 1995.

In the spring of ’95 the Western States Petroleum Association and the California Manufacturers and Technology Association started a campaign against EVs. In early spring, articles started appearing in newspapers, magazines and even scientific journals. They quoted what seemed to be reputable studies and argued that the ZEV mandate would ruin California’s economy, raise the cost of every car sold in America by $5,000 and that the batteries would cause pollution and endanger drivers. In truth, the studies the articles referred to were unreliable.

Then the campaign went into high gear. Political campaign-style ads started appearing on TV. The ads appeared to be produced by concerned citizen groups and suggested that government regulation was going to cost the California taxpayer $28 billion and force everyone into cars that would leave people stranded on the road when their batteries died.

The more than $30 million spent in the campaign amounted to only a few minutes of the auto and oil industries’ annual revenue, but it had a significant effect: Hundreds of companies that were gearing up to produce EV components went out of business. In 1996, the Board eliminated the 2 percent requirement for 1998 and the 5 percent requirement for 2001, but tried to save face by leaving the 10 percent requirement in place for 2003.

Most of the automakers had continued developing EVs in case they could not stop the mandate. In late ’96, GM started to lease the EV1. Toyota started leasing its RAV4 EV in ’97. Honda, Ford, Nissan and Chrysler also offered a limited number of EVs in the following years. But every automaker maintained control of its EVs, primarily by only offering the cars for lease. The lone exception was that Toyota sold about 150 RAV4 EVs in late 2002; I bought one and it now has 56,000 miles and still runs 80 to 100 miles on a charge.

In 2000, the automakers were just three years away from the 10 percent stage of the ZEV mandate. Ford said it could try to meet a revised 2003 requirement. GM, on the other hand, made a series of moves that would culminate in the recall and crushing of the EV1 and the end of GM’s electric vehicle program.

In January 2001, the Board reduced the 2003 requirement to 2 percent. Soon thereafter, GM filed a lawsuit against the state of California. The suit alleged that the Board could find more cost-effective ways to reduce air pollution than by imposing the production of EVs on the auto industry. In June 2002, the federal government joined GM’s lawsuit. A federal judge then issued an injunction preventing the Board from enforcing the 2001 requirement. Then, in April 2003, the automakers and the federal government won, while the public lost: The Board abandoned the mandate.

Plug-in Future

Last year, in response to increasing concerns about the effects of global warming, California passed limits on cars’ CO2 emissions. Again, all the major automakers filed suit against the state of California. Seven northeastern states also have adopted California’s standards. Such moves are part of a growing grass-roots effort by local governments to deal with issues such as climate change and our reliance on oil. (To learn more, visit the Union of Concerned Scientists.)

Although the EV1 and other electric cars never reached mass production, gasoline-electric hybrids, such as the Toyota Prius and Honda Civic Hybrid, have seen runaway success in recent years. Now, the next step is for plug-in hybrids to graduate from the classrooms of Andy Frank and the garages of plug-in conversion companies such as EnergyCS, Hymotion and Hybrids Plus. Interest in plug-in hybrids is booming as drivers are increasingly frustrated with skyrocketing gas prices and cars’ poor fuel economy. Automakers, which previously dismissed the idea of plug-in hybrids, are now openly expressing interest. “We are pursuing a plug-in hybrid vehicle, which will conserve more oil and slice smog and greenhouse gases to nearly imperceptible levels,” said Jim Press, Toyota’s top U.S. executive, in a recent speech. Ford and GM have also expressed interest in plug-in hybrids.

This time around, let’s hope that enough people will demand that automakers offer better transportation choices. Please join the Plug-in Partners National Campaign; together we can transform our transportation system.

In 1993, Mother Earth News contributing editor Steve Heckeroth converted a Karmann Ghia, Fiero and Vanagon with a PV pop-top to run on batteries. Since then, he’s converted more than 12 cars to all-electric power. Today he drives a Toyota RAV4 EV and charges it with solar panels. 

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next

Post a comment below.


7/16/2014 3:22:38 AM
The rate of carbon dioxide gas is in an increasing mode and it is polluting our environment that we all know. We have to start reducing the source from where this carbon dioxide gas is getting generated. Mainly because of the running of the vehicles more and more carbon dioxide gas gets generated. Now-a-days, most of the people are having cars, they are depending on them. It is not bad but, we have to minimize the unwanted use of it. Also, we have the solution of electric cars that we can follow. If the vehicle has some issues then also there is some chance of more carbon dioxide gas generation. We people have to check all these issues and have to try our best to get them solved soon. For any repair or servicing in my BMW, I prefer to visit a http://performingimports.com/services/bmw-repair/ so that my BMW will get proper servicing.

6/17/2014 5:08:49 AM
Directly the answer is to control the pollution of environment we need electric cars. The carbon dioxide gas which also termed as CO2 that gets out from the cars, buses, trucks and from all other vehicles during their run is one of the primary culprit in global warming. So, we have to fight against this primary culprit and have to save our environment. Yes, we do have the solution in terms of electric cars. Electric cars are made to cope with the issue of environment pollution. So, we people have to start adopting such environment friendly vehicle. Along with adopting such vehicle its maintenance and servicing also need concern. So, to achieve the same we have to prefer some finest or we can say trained mechanic and a professional repair center. For my Saab car I am used to visit the http://www.medwayimports.com/Service.aspx in every six months for the servicing and a for a check up of my car. As I am completely dependent on my Saab so, it is a bit risky to avoid its regular maintenance and servicing. So, it is better to service and repair the vehicle when needed.

5/31/2014 10:55:50 AM
Yes, we do have the technology but it all depends at what level we are implementing the same and what are the benefits we can get. Yes, electric cars are environment friendly and technologies used in this car too. So, with the use of his technology vehicle we have the chance to minimize the pollution that harm our environment. I mean to say the carbon dioxide gas that harms our environment gets out mostly from the vehicle we ride because the use of vehicle is excess now-a-days. So, to not face any problem in our future we have to start using electric cars and have to minimize the pollution level. Most of the vehicles start producing more carbon dioxide gas because of the functionality error inside the vehicle. When such issue we are getting it is better for us to visit the best repair center possible near to us. I genuinely prefer VFC Engineering for the repair of my Mini Cooper car as it is one of the http://www.vfc-engineering.com/mini-cooper-repair/. If we go for a best car repair center then we have the chance to get better servicing for the same.

3/29/2014 2:37:25 AM
In this article the first line says it all by mentioning the real fact that, we have the technology but, we have to utilize it in some way so that we can cure our addiction to oil along with this we can stabilize the climate and maintain our standard of living by minimizing the pollution level of our environment and all these things at the same time. And yes if we are able to maintain the transportation efficiency then we can contribute a lot to the environment because, transportation efficiency will help us to minimize the pollution of environment. Our environment gets polluted the most because of the vehicles. This is true because the use of vehicle has increased to the optimum level and the carbon dioxide gas that gets produced during the running process of he vehicle pollute the environment the most. As mentioned here about electric cars, electric cars are made to overcome our issue that is to minimize the pollution of environment. So, a big thank you to the car makers for making this effective vehicle for us and I think we all people have to start using the same. Sometimes, because of some faulty parts the vehicle produce more carbon dioxide gas and when we notice such case we have to go for the best repair center and have to sort out our problem. Once, I had faced the same for my Acura and after I noticed the same I prefer to go for the http://www.carminesimport.com/acura-repair-service/ as I stay there and get my car repaired. The servicing center repaired my car well as well as they had done the routine servicing of my car and my car is running pretty well after that.

3/20/2011 3:38:57 PM
Not all of us can afford electric cars right away. In time this would be ideal. Right now, for those of us who have to drive back and forth to work everyday - in gas guzzling traffic - every penny hurts. So with the ever-raising costs of filling your tank full of gas, there's no shame in cutting every corner to save a buck. All a person needs is the know-how, the tips and tricks, the truth and not the old rumors... http://www.myhowtoebook.com/gas_pump_savings.html

john lee redwine
5/30/2009 10:53:07 PM
My job as a locomotive engineer for the BNSF railroad here in TX. requires me to carry thousands of tons of cargo and use thousands of gallons of fuel to its destination. I handle many coal trains to the power plants and look at the pile of coal in storage and wonder how it will be able to continue and can we continue polluting our planet with the byproducts that these power plants emit. I am 60 years old, but I have had an interest in alternative fuels for many years. I am hoping that electric cars will come to market some time soon, but after going into an electric car dealership in Houston, Tx. a few weeks ago, I wonder if that will ever happen. The sales person seemed to know less than I did, and I do not know that much about them. If this is the norm for electric car salesmen, how are they going to win us over or at least take one out for a test drive. I can look and the sport of R-C aircraft and see the change that has taken place over the last 7 or 8 years. I know that in the past, most people flew glow or gas aircraft, but in the last few years, even the highest level of competition is going to electric power. I have been in the sport maybe 10 years, and there has been an explosion in the RC field, with electric motors and controllers. I know that this is a small group of people when commpared to the use of automobile, so why is there no great advancement in this area. I will admit, that the one part of the RC Electric Sport planes that have not come down are the batteries, but they have increased the capacity and the discharge rates allowing much larger electric motors to be introduced in the sport, which in turn allow larger and heavier planes to be battery powered. It seems to me that if the RC sport people can come up with ways to power their planes, then the transportation industry could do more to advance their electric products. Thanks, J L Redwine

C van de Water
10/20/2007 12:00:00 AM
Hi MWalker,I have a Chevrolet S10 electric truck.It was converted in 1994 by US Electricar and there are probably about 100 still driving around. There also exist Ford Ranger EVs and GM S10 EVs, which share the propulsion with the elusive EV1 that was crushed. There actually are 3 for sale at a government auction right now, they are all non-operation, but that is the way to buy an EV righ now, they are in such demand that it is hard to buy a good running one, as people like to keep them.There is a list of for sale EVs:austinev.org/evtradinpost

Sam Prutch
10/19/2007 12:00:00 AM
Thank you for a forum to share info, good job keep it up. Sam Prutch

Mary Walker
10/17/2007 12:00:00 AM
Cvan de Water You mention you bought an electric vehicle for $4000.00 what type is it. I'm looking into going electric for city driving. Thanks.

yew kai soo lum
10/11/2007 12:00:00 AM
I live in Ontario, Canada. I am interested in purchasing an electric vehiclesometime in the near future.Does any one have any contacts in this area that I can call on?

yew kai soo lum
10/11/2007 12:00:00 AM
I live in Ontario, Canada. I am interested in purchasing an electric vehiclesometime in the near future.Does any one have any contacts in this area that I can call on?

Sam Prutch
9/4/2007 12:00:00 AM
Dear CThorn Thank you for the reply, could you tell me the name of the movie? maybe I can find it from just his name. Sam Prutch

Carl Thorn
9/3/2007 12:00:00 AM
SPrutch. The movie mentioned by AHedrick is all about the GM program. It was in 1996. If you haven't seen it it is very well done and I highly recommend it.

Sam Prutch
9/2/2007 12:00:00 AM
In the late 60's or 70's, I'm not sure when exactly GM had a very successfull electric car that they put out on a lease basis for a while and then they were all recalled and destroyed. Can you tell me if any of these cars survived and are there any pictures available? Thank you very much. Sam

ALAN Hedrick
3/9/2007 12:00:00 AM
I just rented a great movie, "Who Killed the Electric Car?" I loved it so much I immediately bought my own copy to share with my friends.

C van de Water
2/19/2007 12:00:00 AM
I always see the same mis-information posted when Electric Cars are discussed. Curious....TSmall - Hydrogen is an energy carrier that is extremely difficult to handle and transferring energy into Hydrogen or back into usable energy creates large losses, so why would anybody want to do that when the goal is to reduce energy consumption?I recommend "The Emperor's new Hydrogen Economy" the truth is out there although our leaders do not want to confirm this inconvenient truth.

C van de Water
2/19/2007 12:00:00 AM
Why Prius has a lower mileage in cold weather? Simple. More energy goes to keeping the engine (and the cabin) at temperature, so that adds to the consumption, as the extra energy comes from the fuel and since the Prius uses very little for its propulsion, it is very noticeable when you use a bit more. Even mounting new tires is visible on the MPG display.Why do we need electric cars? Simple. To stop paying our enemies.Are Electric Cars available? Oh yes. I bought one under $4000 and drive it every day, unless I use my bicycle for my 10 mile (each way) commute. The Prius is now my second car.

2/18/2007 12:00:00 AM
In marketing Electric Scooters and looking toward marketing Electric Cars, we found the LACK of plug-in stations OUTSIDE of California.We are making a MAJOR effort to create a NATIONAL "Park & Plug-In" database. It would be a listing that Electric Vehicle owners can print out & keep in their glove compartment. We are also giving serious consideration to include paid advertising to help spread the database around as much as possible.We want to greatly increase the use of Electric Scooters starting this spring and Electric Cars come next fall.You can contact us directly at Twenty_Third_Century_Living@yahoo.comKevin McNamara

Thomas D. Small
2/18/2007 12:00:00 AM
I have read the comments above and none of them seem to cover two details. One is the initial cost of the vehicle and the replacement cost of the batteries. The second and most important to me is: If this country were to go largely to electric or hybrid, what are we going to do with the millions of battery packs when they wear out? We already have a major problem with landfills and groundwater contamination and electric or hybrid would compound this situation dramatically. Why aren't we pushing hydrogen? Yes, Iceland is small but they have done a fantastic job on running their economy off of hydrogen. We have deserts for solar power(check out what China is doing), dams, wind power being developed, and yes we have faults (like Iceland) where we could be breaking down water into hydrogen.

2/18/2007 12:00:00 AM
Does anyone know which is more environmentally sound? --keeping (or buying) a used car with average gas mileage, or buying a hybrid car? I've heard the amount of energy into building a new car is about 15-20% the amount of energy the car expends in its lifetime. How do I figure it out?

JOSEPH Sheridan
2/18/2007 12:00:00 AM
In reference to the lower fuel milege in colder weather for the Prius... If you noticed the engine normally starts up and completes a warmup cycle before running in the hybid mode, the newer Prius's have a coolant 'thermos' to keep the warm-up times to a minimum, however, in cold weather the heat will still dissipate to some degree and the vehicle will respond with running the engine more often and for longer periods of time to generate the necessary heat energy which will necessarily cause lower milege figures. Entropy dictates that the energy will be lost more quickly to the surrounding environment if the surounding evironment is at a lower energy state, which is true of colder and colder weather.

PAUL bennett
2/17/2007 12:00:00 AM
RELLERBRAKEI think you got that right.The batteries are exposed to the cold.I'll pass that on.Thanks

MARCO aurilio
2/16/2007 12:00:00 AM
Some balk at electric cars due to lack of performance . But balk no more, go see the Tesla Roadster. www.teslamotors.com. The price is unreasonable, but the principle is proven: 0-60 4.5 sec, 280 mile range, etc... If this technology could be mass produced and a robust method for recycling Li-ion batteries was in place, we would be there. ASlo if an outer Photovoltaic automotive coating could be developed, this could be a platform for any and all vehicles.

PAUL bennett
2/16/2007 12:00:00 AM
A friend of mine has a Prius and has told me about the same 10 mpg decrease in cold weather gas mileage.I told him, cold denser air needs more fuel to burn properly.More fuel and air means more hp, more performance.So if he isn't asking for that extra available performance, he's just driving normally, why is his efficency suffering?

PAUL bennett
2/16/2007 12:00:00 AM
I have a Mini with two under used rear wheels.Can sombody sell me a kit with two hub motors a controller and some batteries.A kit like that would make 80% of my trips emmission free, the other 20% could be covered by the gas motor.The real plus is the extra green 30 or 40 hp when I step on it, and 4 wheel drive.The John Cooper performance package would give me that 40 hp for about $7000 plus gas.

2/16/2007 12:00:00 AM
pbennett- I thinkit may be that in cold weather batteries don't perform as well, and the electric boost is less, thusmore gasoline is used; I do not pushfor performancein cold weather,and still the mileage is low. My thought is cold weather = less battery power.

2/16/2007 12:00:00 AM
Hybrid cars are ok but if 10% of the population were to get electric cars this year would the electric suppliers be able to supply the increase in demand. I don't think so. They already are near their limit. We should try to increase solar and wind power first.

2/16/2007 12:00:00 AM
Yes, I have a 2005 Prius. I was surprised to find that in cold weather the mileage is considerably lower than summer-- by perhaps 10 to 12 mpg. Summer- combination highway/city (perhaps 60%/40%) gets about 57 mpg. Really cold weather -like now- perhaps 45 mpg.What I would like to consider is modifying the Prius for plug-in electric, and I understand there are some after market modifictions available but haven't really checked that out as yet. Anyone have information about that? ÿÿǸ5࿐ቷ￿￿￿￿￿￿

Subscribe Today!

Pay Now & Save 67% Off the Cover Price

(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here