MAX Update No. 53: Taking Sides In the Impact Wars

| 7/27/2010 9:17:06 PM

Tags: MAX, 100 mpg, fuel economy, mileage, safety, Jack McCornack,

While I'm adding bodywork, I'm also adding some side impact protection.

MU53The “pontoons” (back in the day, that's what they called the side thingies that go between the front and rear wheels so the air doesn't have to go around wheels twice) could be completely hollow, and if I were making a race car they probably would be, but out on the road, where people go all kinds of funny directions and some of them have big clumsy cars to hit you with, I decided to sacrifice some lightness and add some structure between the cockpit and the outside world.

I researched a number of materials. Urethane foam was one thought (it's what R.Q. Riley uses on his XR3, (see MAX Update No. 5) and a number of production cars use expanded styrene under their bumpers and door panels (an industrial strength version of the stuff that cheapo picnic coolers are made of). I even considered rubber bubber beegle beebers ... reeble beeble buggle bungers ... but it turned out to be so hard to pronounce that I gave up on it.

Instead I decided on yet more steel tubing, like the rest of the frame is made from. There were lots of reasons, mostly boiling down to it's what the car is made of already. Why does that matter? Well, for somebody building a MAX replica, it saves them from finding new materials and changing skill sets in mid-build, and it integrates well with what is already there, and it will collapse and bend in concert with the rest of the chassis in the event of an accident.

Another nice thing about working with welded steel tube is, I can tell how much weight it will add without even having to touch it, all I have to do is look it up. Let's see, 1” by 0.065” wall square steel tubing weighs 0.83 pounds per foot, the 7/8” diagonal braces weighs 0.68 pounds per foot, the 1” round 0.049” triangulation tubing weighs half a pound per foot ... this sidebumper structure will add 9 pounds per side when I'm done. Whoa, how am I going to make that up? 

Actually, I have a plan to compensate for the extra weight, and I'll share it with you soon.

jack mccornack
8/6/2010 4:11:33 PM

Hi Robert, that exterior tube "cage" is a racing option on the STL, required in some racing agendas. It is simple indeed, but it's outside the body and so adds considerable aerodynamic drag. In racing classes where it's required, everybody's got one so it's an even playing field. Neither MAX nor the Locosaki qualify as "the same Lotus 7" and if you don't believe me, you can call Lotus's legal department. :-)

robert griffin
8/6/2010 11:46:36 AM

I saw pictures of a "Stuart Taylor Motorsports Locosaki". This is a kit version of the same Lotus 7. It had a side impact structure that looked less complicated. I assume that it met the racing sanction requirements. Just an FYI for an alternative design.

jack mccornack
8/2/2010 8:20:33 PM

Hi Eddie, well it's going to have to be soon 'cause MAX has a race to run in a dozen days and I have to drive it to Iowa to get to the start line. I've made a couple of minor time consuming goofs and the body still looks semi-slapdash so I'd like to wait until I've made it a trifle prettier...I think I'll write a blog entry about goofing up and wasting time. But to answer your question, at least by the weekend.

eddie colon_1
7/30/2010 12:51:57 PM

Hi Jack. New framework, new sleeker body..... when are we gonna see pics of the improved MAX ?

dairy goat


Aug. 5-6, 2017
Albany, Ore.

Discover a dazzling array of workshops and lectures designed to get you further down the path to independence and self-reliance.