Green Transportation

Moving toward a transportation system that fuels healthy people and a healthy planet.

Add to My MSN

MAX Update No. 68: Idle Speculation

2/21/2011 2:58:24 PM

Tags: MAX, 100 mpg, fuel economy, ScanGauge, Jack McCornack

MU68HoneybearIdleThe honey bear is back. 

One advantage of hybrids over ICE cars (that's Internal Combustion Engine, if you're new here) is they don't have to idle while waiting for the light to change. That's no small advantage with normal cars. For example, according to my ScanGauge II (about which I'll write more some day), my '96 six cylinder minivan burns 0.43 gallons per hour at idle (with an occasional bump to 0.44), or in other words, about a gallon every 2 hours and 19 minutes.

Unfortunately, I can't plug my ScanGauge into MAX, because MAX doesn't have an OBD II port. That's the little on-board diagnostic (hence OBD) socket under your steering wheel, if you have a mid-'90s or newer car. The OBD protocol is a way to get electronic information from your car's fuel injection computer to the mechanic who is wondering why it's running funny, information that includes how much fuel the engine is burning. The ScanGauge II translates that info into plain English, and puts it where you can read it, on the screen of a little box that sits on top your dash.

MAX's fuel injection is strictly mechanical. There's no computer, thus no data to read. So I plugged in the HBFCI (Honey Bear Fuel Consumption Indicator), calibrated to 4 fluid ounces (118 milliliters really, 'cause it's hard to find anything that will measure a fluid ounce precisely), and goofy as it may look, that space between the honey bear's neck (marked with yellow zip-ties) and knees (marked with blue tape) is within a percent or two of 4 oz.

So what did I learn? After I got MAX warmed up, I filled the HB to just below the lips* and let the engine idle. When the fuel level got down to the neckline I started the timer. When the fuel level got down to the kneeline, I took this photo.

Four ounces in 13 minutes and 12 seconds. That's 3.425 minutes per ounce. Times 128 (fluid ounces per gallon) is 438.4 minutes per gallon, about 7 hours and 18 minutes. 

Okay, both my “about”s are a tad imprecise, and it's probably better to round the results for comparison purposes, so I'll say about 2:20 (2-1/3 hours) per gallon for the minivan and 7:20 (7-1/3 hours) per gallon for MAX. My conclusion is, MAX won't get better fuel economy by making MAX a hybrid, because the weight we'd add (batteries, motor, etc.) would do more harm than the hybridizing would do good. For a heavier vehicle, now that's a different story, but here, we're talking about MAX. 

*No honey bears were harmed in the making of this MAX Update.   


Photo by Jack McCornack

Browse through all MAX Updates

Check out the 100-mpg Car page for all things MAX. 



Related Content

How do I Hone Woodworking Skills to Become Expert Trim Carpenter?

Steve Maxwell, “Canada’s Handiest Man”, outlines some suggestions on how to become an expert carpent...

Living Better on Less Energy: Fuel Economy History Was Made in California

For the first time ever, Diesel motorcycles publicaly demonstrate their potential in real riding.

MAX Update No. 44: Responses to Sharp Criticisms

Is MAX an actual modern-day vehicle, or just a high school shop class experiment? In this update, Ja...

MAX Update No. 76: Wheels Are Turning

MAX got some new lager diameter wheels. They should do the job and the price was right, and as a bon...

Content Tools




Post a comment below.

 

Jack McCornack
3/8/2011 1:47:20 AM
Okay Jason, you've convinced me. I'll start scouring the wrecking yards and see if I can find a starter/alternator from a 2007 to 2009 Malibu or Vue. On those cars, the BAS didn't seem to do much good; not enough to justify the increased sticker price (they were discontinued because they didn't sell well), but for MAX, another 19 horses might make up for the extra weight and expense. I'll look into it.

Jason Hinton
3/6/2011 5:34:18 PM
It sounds like Max is perfect for your type of driving. A hybrid is much more difficult to build than MAX, no doubt. The problem is the control systems needed to make the engine and electric motor work together seamlessly. I'm not sure what types of hybrid system you have looked at but something like GM's BAS (now eAssist) might be worth a look. The BAS system (Belt / Alternator / Starter) simple removes the alternator and starter and replaces them with a single electric motor. This motor starts the car, provides power for the electric systems, provides regenerative braking, and gives an electric boost under acceleration. Mechanically this is a very simple, improves fuel economy 30%, and adds only 100 pounds for the 36V battery pack. Something like this is so easy for an automaker to do is is shocking that such a system isn't a standard feature for every car. The Prius works well for us but is a larger car than what we need. At the time it was the most fuel efficient car in the used market. While I like the Leaf it is not sold in our state nor do we need a new car. Her Prius only has 75K miles and my Jetta TDI has only 215K. Both have been trouble free and have a lot of life left in them. In 2-3 year we may look at replacing my VW and then an electric like the Leaf will be on the top of our used car shopping list.

Jack McCornack
3/6/2011 2:05:02 AM
Jason, a Prius sounds right for your family...though as far as your wife's commute goes, I think a Leaf would be even better. And if you were on a tight budget, a home built electric car would meet her commuting needs. A short (but time consuming) trip is exactly right for a low tech electric car, of the style that motivated MOTHER readers have been building for 30+ years. But I'm in a rural environment, about four miles from a town of 1500 souls. The county seat has 33,000 and it's where we go if we need anything exotic, such as trousers or fax paper. To see my doctor or a movie, I drive for as long as your wife drives to work...it takes us both 40 minutes, but her drive is 7 miles and mine is 30 miles. So an efficient cruiser works for me, better than an efficient traffic jammer would. If I had Toyota's resources, perhaps an ultralight hybrid system would be better than what I have, but on MAX's budget, and using off the shelf components, the added weight of the electric drive system would hurt MAX more than it would help. I've looked into this a lot, I've got a good support group of EV builders and suppliers, and I don't see how we could hybridize MAX without adding 250 pounds to it--which would mean I'd need more power to get over Hayes Hill and up Eight Dollar Mountain. I'm in an environment where MAX benefits greatly from light weight, and wouldn't gain much by driving slow with the engine off.

Jason Hinton
3/4/2011 2:46:51 PM
I'm not sure how you have concluded the Max won't get better mileage as a hybrid. Hybrids do much more than just stop and restart the engine at idle. One huge advantage to a hybrid is the ability to drive at low speeds using only the electric motor. My wife and I have a 05 Prius that she drives in severe stop and go traffic. Her 7 mile commute takes 40 minutes and there is a mile long section that routinely takes 25 minutes. While a normal car would idle this whole time, our Prius rolls along using only the electric motor. We have averaged 46.3 mpg over the 54,808 miles we have driven so far. The additional weight required for a hybrid is also often blown out of proportion. The hybrid battery in our Prius weighs 90 lbs. (That includes the housing and fan) The Prius has two motor/generators but does not have a starter or alternator. So essentially a hybrid system just a heavier duty version of what a conventional car already has; a battery and two electric motors. The electric controller is the only additional item.

john haendiges
3/1/2011 1:59:33 PM
I'm both impressed by and amused with your choice of vessel. It's result is no less valid since the volume is known, and it made for a more enjoyable reading experience.

t brandt
2/27/2011 9:05:29 AM
Some readers may minimize the impact of idle on fuel consumption: "1 gal in 2 hrs? Big deal!" To put it in perspective, a big-city rush hour commute may easily involve a half hr of stop for every half hour of go, so every 2 days, you'd waste a gal. of fuel getting to work and back. Multiply that by 100 million commuting vehicles in the US, and we've burned a whole lotta fuel going nowhere. Same for stop lites: 30 seconds each and stopping only 10 times a day, that's a gal in three weeks, times 300 million vehicles. It adds up and we're running out.

Jack McCornack
2/24/2011 8:50:10 PM
The problem is, I have to calibrate the container no matter what it is because the fuel lines have to be immersed in the contents of the container, and their displacement throws off the volume. So I had to measure what I put in and mark the container accordingly. If I'd used a graduated beaker, I'd have had to explain why I wasn't going by the graduations emblazoned on it, and folks who didn't get the fuel line displacement issue would have said "Liar liar pants afire!" On a honey bear, the only problem I've had is explaining why half of a 12 ounce honey bear bottle is 4 ounces. (It's because honey is sold by weight and it weighs about 1-1/2 times what water weighs; 12 ounces of honey is 8 fluid ounces) PS--I wonder if it was more dangerous to be a muppet on The Muppet Show or on Sesame Street. They deserved hazardous duty pay in both venues.

George_41
2/23/2011 2:27:43 AM
For accurate liquid measurement, you could try a beaker, and by that I mean a glass or plastic scientific measuring container. I would not want it confused with Dr. Bunsen Honeydew's assistant on the *Muppet Show. Have a great day, and keep up the good work. This project is fascinating, even if I don't understand all the technical details of it. George * No muppets were harmed in the making of these comments.







Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.