Green Homes

Building for the future, today – combining the best of historical wisdom and modern technology.

Add to My MSN

Building My Net Zero Energy Home: Key Early Decisions

6/14/2012 3:19:00 PM

Tags: Super Green Net Zero Energy Home, net zero energy, green homes, efficiency, passive solar, foundation, insulation, foundation insulation, walls, ICFs, SIPs, double two by four, Dan Chiras

When I decided to rebuild my home at The Evergreen Institute in east-central Missouri, which as many readers know, burned in a fire in January 2011, I had to make some decisions before I could begin work with my architect, James Plagmann of HumaNature Architecture. 

The first decision was whether I would retain the existing foundation or start anew. In my case, the choice was made by the fire and the building department. As it turns out, the south wall of the foundation had been so badly damaged in the fire that it had to go. That was the building department’s recommendation.

To create a net zero energy home, I knew I had to pour on the insulation. So, I decided to build with insulated concrete forms to achieve an R value of around 30. I also decided to place 5 inches of extruded polystyrene under the slab to achieve an R-value of around 30. At this writing, we’ve already poured the foundation walls.

insulated concrete form 

I next turned my attention to the design of the exterior walls. To achieve net zero energy, I decided on R-50 in the walls. That limited my options considerably. 

The first option was straw bale. While it is one of my favorite building materials, straw bale seemed impractical. An 18-inch wide straw bale has an R-value of only around R-32. To achieve R-50, I’d have to build a second wall out of two by fours and install additional insulation. I’d need another 6 inches of wall depth. A 24-inch wall seemed absurd, so straw bale was eliminated from the mix. Besides, my county prohibits straw bale construction.

I then began to compare three other options: insulated concrete forms or ICFs, structural insulated panels or SIPs, and a super-insulated double 2 x 4 wall. 

As just noted, I used ICFs for the basement, so it would have been an excellent option. Problem was, to achieve R-50 I still would have had to pile on a ton of insulation. Besides, I didn’t want to use that much concrete, which has a pretty high embodied energy.

Structural insulated panels seemed like a great option, too, but as in the case of straw bales and ICFs, I’d very like still need to add more insulation to achieve the R value I was after. Furthermore, I received a bid from ICS, a Colorado-based manufacturer of an excellent ICF. The bid came in at over $22,000. I’d need to rent a small crane to install the ICFs for a day or two, and hire a couple workers to help me install them. Furthermore, I’d have to ship the ICFs by truck around 800 miles, burning a considerable amount of fossil fuel.

Another serious issue I had with SIPs was bridging loss around all the windows and doors and at the top plate and bottom plate. We would need to install solid dimensional lumber in all of these locations and wood as an R-value of only 1 per inch. In this home, I wanted to eliminate or at least greatly reduce bridging losses to achieve net zero energy.

My third option was to build a double two by four wall. I had remodeled my classroom using this technique and was pretty impressed with it. What made this option more desirable to me was that I can buy locally produced 2 x 4s, and create a wall with no bridging loss around doors and windows or at the top plate and bottom plate. I could also use advanced framing techniques to reduce lumber use and costs.  Furthermore, I could use cellulose (recycled newsprint) to insulate the exterior walls.

So, this seemed like one of the greenest options and most effective options.

To create an airtight wall, I opted to blow in two inches of liquid foam insulation with an R-value of 6.8 per inch. With 12 additional inches of cellulose, I could easily achieve an R-value of 52.  By my estimates, the wall construction and insulation would cost me about $12,000 without labor. Labor could add another $3000 to the cost, so it turned out far cheaper than SIPs.

In my next blog, I’ll discuss my choice of roof framing…


Contributing editor Dan Chiras is a renewable energy and green homes expert who has spent a lifetime learning life’s lessons, which he shares in his popular blog, Dan Chiras on Loving Life. He’s the founder and director of The Evergreen Institute and president of Sustainable Systems Design. Contact him by visiting his website or finding him on .



Related Content

Dispelling the Myths of Solar Electricity: Energy Payback

The energy a PV system will produce during its lifetime far exceeds the amount of energy it takes to...

Eco-Laboratory Wins at GreenBuild

Net zero high rise is a self-contained sustainable community.

Greensburg’s Eco-Renewal

Last weekend—the second anniversary of the tornado that destroyed the small town of Greensburg, Kans...

Changing the footprint for Passive Solar Gain

To build a net zero energy home, you'll need to design for passive gain. That requires a shallower f...

Content Tools




Post a comment below.

 

John Leeper
9/1/2012 3:14:01 AM
In March 2009 I moved into my 1250 sq. ft. ICF/solar powered home that I built in NW Florida. The synergy for energy and cost savings has been proven and worked out better than expected. The house which is my retirement home is NET ZERO. This is not a theoretical calculation or based on HERS rating. We actually have produced 2500 kw hours more than purchased from the utility. It is amazing really how easy it was to reach the net zero goal by simply putting energy efficiency and structural strength against hurricane winds as top priority over the usual "luxury" amenities used to try to sell homes in this real estate speculation mecca. Basic features include Logix ICF walls 12 inches thick filled with 6 inches of concrete and rebar. Demilec blown open cell foam insulation under the roof. 25 SEER minisplits heat and cool up stairs and down stairs one each. Careful placement and selection of vinyl double hung insulated windows helps as well as a solar clothes dryer and a cheap solar hot water heater that heats the outdoor shower water 9 months of the year. Also a tankless hot water heater helps keep usage low. There are some things I would do differently maybe, but you can't argue with successful results, and we enjoy a very comfortable climate indoors. ICF and solar are a great combination. Oh, the PV system is only 3.8 kw. Anybody can do this. We didn't have a green architect or do anything fancy...just put energy savings first before jacuzzi tubs or granite counters.

Rick Rogoski
7/7/2012 3:40:13 PM
Mike -Where can I go to see engineering or graphic details of your discussion? I am close to designing my retirement home and just beginning to look at different concepts.

Terry Smith
7/6/2012 4:53:34 PM
You switch back and forth from IFC's to SIP's in the article. I am confused with your statement about shipping cost and using a crane to install IFC's. Maybe I am missing something or you are talking about SIP's but wrote IFC's? ICS makes SIP's. Do the editors at Mother Earth News read these articles before they go to publication?

MIKE KIERNAN
6/15/2012 4:49:08 PM
The idea of straw bail building after a fire should be self-answering, not to mention a huge no-no when it comes to homeowner's insurance. The issue of ICF should have been a simple one for the foundation and I plan on doing the same for mine in the very near future. The same can be said for SIP's as once they are 'based', taped and the top plate's secured,The only added thing left is a serious case of TVVEK or TYPAR to seal off any airdraft.and once that's done the house shell is done. The concept of super 2x4's is curious since the more obvious choice is 2x6's with corresponding multi-layer batt's, or as is more efficient and long term chaeper, the use of a cold expanding foam akin to the current BASK Eco-Tite stuff. Cutting 2x6's is cheaper than 2x4's and the added space for insulation will payoff far quicker than you can imagine. Maybe the door's and the window millwork might be a bit more expensive but that cost is easily recouped when the insulation vs heating bills are balanced out.







Subscribe Today - Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Lighten the Strain on the Earth and Your Budget

MOTHER EARTH NEWS is the guide to living — as one reader stated — “with little money and abundant happiness.” Every issue is an invaluable guide to leading a more sustainable life, covering ideas from fighting rising energy costs and protecting the environment to avoiding unnecessary spending on processed food. You’ll find tips for slashing heating bills; growing fresh, natural produce at home; and more. MOTHER EARTH NEWS helps you cut costs without sacrificing modern luxuries.

At MOTHER EARTH NEWS, we are dedicated to conserving our planet’s natural resources while helping you conserve your financial resources. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing through our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. By paying with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of MOTHER EARTH NEWS for only $12.00 (USA only).

You may also use the Bill Me option and pay $17.00 for 6 issues.