The Truth About the Animal ID Plan
(Page 6 of 7)
June/July 2007
By Jack Kittredge
As the Council for Agricultural Science and Technology said in a 2005 report tracing the transition of livestock production from family farms to industrial confinement: “A major impact of modern intensive production systems is that they allow the rapid selection and amplification of pathogens.” The industry-funded group’s report concludes: “Stated simply, because of the livestock revolution, global risks of disease are increasing.”
RELATED CONTENT
One of the best ways to avoid the misery of poison ivy or poison oak exposure is to learn how to re...
Support local, sustainable meat producers (and get more meat for your money) with a little help fro...
A Plowboy Interview with Dr. Michael Fox, a spokesperson of the animal welfare movement and opposed...
This simple animal shelter, a versatile pole barn building for livestock animals, such as cows, she...
IS ANIMAL ID MANDATORY?
Even though the USDA now is calling their animal ID system “voluntary at the federal level,” it is funding state and tribal governments to participate in the program, including states that have mandatory registration laws. Wisconsin currently requires registration of all places where any livestock are kept. Indiana mandates registration as well, but excludes equines, camelids (llamas, etc.) and poultry. Michigan requires all cattle to have an ID chip.
In some states, the requirement to participate in some aspect of the ID program is more subtle: One has to sign up to qualify for licenses or to comply with disease control programs. The USDA has encouraged this backdoor approach to enforcement, predicting that “the success of the premises registration component would be achieved through the participation of producers in long-standing disease management programs and compliance with interstate movement regulations.” Tennessee, for example, currently requires a farm to complete premises registration to qualify for various farm assistance programs.
OPPONENTS MAKE PROGRESS
Opposition to the ID program is widespread and growing in rural areas across the country. In at least 11 states, legislation has been introduced to oppose the program, and in Texas, Kentucky and Vermont, efforts to mandate premises registration have been defeated by strong, vocal opposition. If you are interested in fighting the USDA animal ID program, here are some things you can do:
• Learn more about the program and find ways you can help (see the resources box below).
• Strengthen small farming by buying local animal products, raised by farmers you can talk to.
• Contact your state and federal representatives and express your concerns about the program.
TO LEARN MORE
Many groups have voiced their opposition to animal ID regulations. Here's where you can find more information.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 | 6 |
7 |
Next >>