How Farm Policy Affects Us All
(Page 5 of 5)
June/July 2007, Issue 222
By Tom Philpott
MOVING FORWARD
RELATED CONTENT
Lifestyles Food Digest...
UN food agency says 1 billion people hungry, poor paying more for food despite recession...
Musical icon and Farm Aid president Willie Nelson kicked off last September’s annual Farm Aid conce...
Here’s a new way to bring together coalitions that are working toward the promotion of locally grow...
Food Co-ops: Good Food and Good Prices September/October 1979 A "New Wave" of grocery outlets can g...
Given the depth of these dysfunctions, the Bush administration’s agenda for the 2007 farm bill is weak medicine indeed. It offers nothing substantial to remedy agriculture’s structural supply/demand imbalance, nor does it seriously address the gaping public health and environmental damage wrought by the food production system. The Bush proposal, for all its claims of fiscal restraint, would still cost taxpayers $87.8 billion over the next five years, USDA chief Mike Johanns acknowledged.
Rather than paying out cash directly to farmers, what if we invested it in rebuilding local food infrastructure, helping farmers transition to organic production, and research into increasing the productivity of sustainable agriculture?
The time has come to reject old models and demand policies that align the needs of farmers with those of consumers (including those with low incomes), and with public health and environmental protection.
— Tom Philpott regularly writes about the eco-politics of food. Read his review of an informative new book about farm policy, Food Fight: The Citizen’s Guide to a Food and Farm Bill.
RESOURCES
Dig further into the development of the 2007 farm bill: www.farmpolicy.com
Read “Seeking Balance,” an outline for a new direction in U.S. farm policy: www.farmandfoodproject.org
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 | 5 |