How We Can Decrease the Projected Global Energy Demand for 2020
(Page 3 of 3)
July 2008
By Lester R. Brown, Earth Policy Institute
Overall, investing in energy efficiency to offset increasing energy demand is often cheaper than expanding the energy supply to meet that demand. Efficiency investments typically yield a high rate of return and can help fight climate change by avoiding additional CO2 emissions.
RELATED CONTENT
The U.S. Department of Energy's work with the city of Greensburg, Kan., over the past year is beari...
A new study predicts we could have one quarter of our energy needs from renewable sources by 2025, ...
Which renewable energy technology has the best potential to combat global warming and power our fut...
Missouri creates a stronger market for renewable energy by passing a clean energy initiative....
In stark contrast to the International Energy Agency’s projected 30 percent growth in demand, realizing the Plan B efficiency measures alone would lead to a 6 percent decline in global primary energy demand from 2006 levels by 2020. Beyond these productivity gains, because producing power from fossil fuels generates large amounts of waste heat (and wasted heat equals wasted energy), shifting from fossil fuels to renewables — another key step toward stabilizing climate — would further reduce primary energy demand in the Plan B energy economy.
For more information on the Earth Policy Institute's plan to decrease global energy demand by 2020, see chapter 11 in Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization, avaliable for free download at EarthPolicy.org.
Also see Time for Plan B: Cutting Carbon Emissions 80 Percent by 2020 (pdf).
Sign up for the Earth Policy News e-mail list. You’ll receive Eco-Economy Updates, Eco-Economy Indicators and Book Bytes. You’ll also get press releases and learn about new books the Earth Policy Institute released. This is a low-traffic list.
Copyright © 2008 Earth Policy Institute.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 | 3 |