KILOWATTS FROM CORNOBS
(Page 5 of 6)
Obviously, by generating its own power during peak
demand periods, using crop wastes, the municipal utility
illustrated in this instance could maintain a
consistent level of purchased power and save money
... even when the locally produced energy is somewhat
expensive on a per-kilowatt basis. This practice, in fact,
would virtually bring back on line the hundreds of
small-scale, decentralized power-production centers
indigenous to rural communities, and allow us to rely less
on the massive, vulnerable (and often nuclearpowered)
generating plants now in use.
RELATED CONTENT
The new guide from the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency provi...
Get ready for better gas mileage!...
Book review of a guide to plans and methods for village and intermediate technology, Appropriate Te...
A Plowboy Interview with Isaac Asimov, world-famous science-fiction author....
In addition to fueling municipal utilities in several ways,
corncob gasification has a place in farming, manufacturing,
and even individual applications . . . where production of
power and heat for varying periods would be desirable.
And—under the regulations specified in Section 210 of
the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act of 1978—it
may be feasible for such independent producers to sell
their excess power to local utilities.
Furthermore, it's possible to use the manufactured fuel in
closecoupled combustion ... in which case it could replace
natural gas for such tasks as grain drying or space
heating. In this mode, at about a 90% gasifier efficiency
(as opposed to 80% when the equipment is used in
conjunction with a diesel engine), corn gas
costs—based on a cob price of $15 per ton—work
out to just over $1.00 per million BTU ... in comparison
with natural gas expenses of approximately $5.00 for the
same measure. (Capital costs roughly figure to about $2,000
per million BTU of capacity, or $3,500 for one 16"
gasification unit.)
Above and beyond these financial considerations, the
widespread use of simple gasification equipment could have
a number of social and economic benefits. The fuel is a
renewable and (apparently) environmentally sound
agricultural by-product that demands little in the way of
preparation or storage, and it's perfectly suited to local
utilization.
Perhaps equally important, the development of this process
would offer a supplemental market to corn growers (who now
have to sell their crop at below-production-cost prices).
The sale of cobs at $15 to $25 per ton would enhance the
corn's total market value by 11¢ to 17¢ per
bushel. Over the long term, the practice would also
conserve fuel reserves by creating financial incentives to
pick and shell, rather than combine, the corn. (Besides the
fact that combining equipment costs considerably more than
traditional cornharvesting implements—and also
physically renders the cobs useless for gasifier
fuel—the delayed shelling of the crop would allow it
to cure on the cob, thus reducing energy requirements for
drying.)
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 | 5 |
6 |
Next >>