Energy Flashes: Fuel & Energy Alternatives
Here are short articles on Big V-8, electrical energy consumption, geothermal energy, fuel of the future, ammonia-powered car, heat pump, Nancy May and her can of gasoline.
If your big V-8 drinks too much gas, just cut it in two. That's the approach used by Joe Lawyer, a mechanic at the Jim Clark Chrysler-Plymouth agency in Topeka, Kansas. Lawyer reworks an eight-cylinder engine's carburetor, modifies its valve train and makes other adjustments so that the powerplant becomes a "V-4." The unused pistons are left in place to act as a second flywheel and people who don't know about the modification often pick one of the reworked engines as "sounding smoother" than a standard V-8. The idea, which is really nothing new (it was used during the fuel rationing days of World War II), is said to jump the economy of a 1974 Plymouth Fury from 13 to as high as 20.6 miles per gallon.
RELATED CONTENT
The U.S. Department of Energy's work with the city of Greensburg, Kan., over the past year is beari...
A new study predicts we could have one quarter of our energy needs from renewable sources by 2025, ...
Which renewable energy technology has the best potential to combat global warming and power our fut...
Missouri creates a stronger market for renewable energy by passing a clean energy initiative....
. . . ENERGY FLASHES...... ENERGY FLASHES...... ENERGY FLASHES. . . September/October 1982 POPEYE W...
Phooey on industry projections that endlessly tell us we must double our consumption of electrical energy every 8-12 years. No less an authority than the Rand Corporation recently stated that better insulation in houses and other simple measures can cut California's projected demand for electricity in the year 2000 by as much as 65%. Hooray (for once) for the Rand Corporation.
Geothermal energy (see Mother Earth News' first report on the subject way back in iss. no. 11), long scoffed at by the pushers of "modern" atomic power, may win out in the end. A National Science Foundation report indicates that the U.S. could, by 1985, be tapping geothermal energy equal to more than 100 of the largest nuclear plants in operation.
Although the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and certain fuzzy-minded politicians continue to tout nuclear energy as the "fuel of the future," destined to make the U.S. "energy self-sufficient" by such and such a date, an increasing number of knowledgeable scientists now think otherwise. Growing evidence indicates that the net gain of usable power from atomic reactors is very small. Nuclear energy's future, in other words, depends quite heavily on the availability of fossil fuels, and once those are gone, it's goodbye atomic energy. This, of course, says nothing at all about the tremendously serious safety problems that nuclear power presents and which the AEC can no longer hide. We may well become energy self-sufficient within the next 15 to 25 years, but it will be geothermal, solar and other so-called "alternative" power sources, with strong help from conservation programs, that do it.
