THE PLOWBOY INTERVIEW BILL MOLLISON
(Page 8 of 16)
Sector placement, on the other hand, governs the
energies entering the system from the outside: both
disruptive forces like fire or flood . . . and beneficial
ones like sunlight and wind. Such factors can be either
screened out or filtered into the system, according to the
design. The aim is to channel external forces in such a way
that they'll efficiently serve the needs of an evolved
permaculture.
RELATED CONTENT
Environmental pollutants and infectious diseases are posing greater threats to human health than ev...
Build a simple, humane trap to keep your garden safe from unwanted critters. This easy, do-it-yours...
Catching up with Bill Mollison on his speaking tour about sustainable agriculture systems....
A CHICKEN-AND-GRAPE ""PERMACULTURE"" SYSTEM March/April 1984 by Herbert H.W. Heesch Two years ago, ...
Book review of a guide to plans and methods for village and intermediate technology, Appropriate Te...
Now a fascinating concept comes into play here, called the
"edge effect". Ecologists have long recognized that the
area of intersection of two systems is a highly complex
— and extremely productive — region where
species from both systems can coexist comfortably
. . . along with other species that are peculiar to the
"edge" itself. Gross photosynthetic production is higher at
the interface, and this richness of plant and animal life
is very valuable to us as permaculture designers. So
— when we plan the zones and sectors — we try
to allow for a maximum area of interface between land and
water, tree and lawn, open country and dense vegetation.
That's the basic plan. Then — having set up the
zones, sectors, and interfaces — the designer tries
to make the highest possible number of functional
connections among the species he or she has to work with.
Each plant or animal should — in itself — serve
a number of functions, and it should also interact
with other species in a variety of ways.
PLOWBOY: Why is the principle of
multifunction so essential?
MOLLISON: Because it's part of the
system's array of checks and balances. A single species can
operate in an almost infinite number of ways, you see, and
its yield is directly controlled by the designer's
discovery of all the ways in which it can function. His or
her imagination, then, can literally take the lid right off
what are commonly presumed to be the maximum possible yield
figures for any particular species.
Here's an example I like to use: I call it my chicken
model. Take four separate elements: a hen coop, a
greenhouse, a pond, and a small forest. Now you can have
these on your farm . . . and place them wherever you like,
in no particular relationship to each other. In that
situation each one functions individually, and they all
consume energy. But if you make the forest a forage range
for the chickens by putting the coop in or near that forest
. . . if you attach the greenhouse to the front of the
chickens' shelter . . . and if you set the pond in front of
the greenhouse — as illustrated in Permaculture
Two — well, then you've got a nice system of
interrelating functions, the familiar checks and balances.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 | 8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
Next >>