THE PLOWBOY INTERVIEW BILL MOLLISON
(Page 7 of 16)
What practitioners of permaculture do, then, is cooperate
with the earth and avoid the use of force. In accordance
with Fukuoka's "do nothing" system of farming, we use no
machinery . . . no digging or slashing machines, which
would only disturb the earth and create an imbalance by the
introduction of force. And this is the point that I must
make time and again: If you use energy in any way
non productively, then you are causing a chaotic
condition, either in your garden or in your society.
Permaculture involves a thought process in which you design
systems to harmonize with nature, not to oppose
it.
RELATED CONTENT
Environmental pollutants and infectious diseases are posing greater threats to human health than ev...
Build a simple, humane trap to keep your garden safe from unwanted critters. This easy, do-it-yours...
Catching up with Bill Mollison on his speaking tour about sustainable agriculture systems....
A CHICKEN-AND-GRAPE ""PERMACULTURE"" SYSTEM March/April 1984 by Herbert H.W. Heesch Two years ago, ...
A Plowboy Interview with Isaac Asimov, world-famous science-fiction author....
PLOWBOY: Let's talk some more about the
role of design in a permacultural system. Just how
important is it?
MOLLISON: It makes all the difference in
the world! Look at Fukuoka: That man, at 74, controls 12
acres at a higher productivity than any other farmer on
earth . . . and he does it all on foot, with no machines
whatsoever! And even his design could be improved upon. The
point is that, by applying any sort of temporal and spatial
pattern, one can literally achieve wonders in the product
yields of a system.
PLOWBOY: What are some of the design
criteria used in the formation of a permaculture? I mean,
exactly how do you go about planning one of these
microcosms?
MOLLISON: First of all, you take stock of
all the external factors that must be worked with —
such as climate, topography, soil, and water supply —
and then choose plant and animal species that are highly
suited to that particular set of factors. And this is the
point at which permaculture must radically differ from
commercial agriculture. If you want to — particularly
here in the Americas — you can sit down and design a
very productive piece of swampland containing people,
ducks, invertebrates, and so forth . . . because swamps are
naturally productive areas, and such a system will produce
a vast number of useful things. But modern agribusiness
experts would advise draining the swamp and making it into
a cattle fodder system! That's far too wasteful .
. . in effect, it turns a natural area of high productivity
into an artificial place of extremely low
productivity.
When you're developing the spatial design for a
permaculture, you literally start at your own doorstep and
work out from there . . . all the way to the horizon! The
ground plan — starting from the center, where the
dwelling and other principal buildings are located —
involves concentric zones, with each species placed so as
to maximize its usefulness in the ecosystem. The
arrangement should be based on the principle of greatest
accessibility: The species that need your attention or
control most often — for watering or harvest, for
example — are best located closest to the dwelling
site . . . while plants and animals that need little or no
attention are likely to be on the periphery of the
system. Zone placement, then, governs the energies that are
generated within the system, so that the whole
"structure" operates on the least amount of labor possible.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 | 7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
Next >>