HIGH YIELDS AND HIGHER HOPES
(Page 3 of 7)
ENORMOUS YIELDS POSSIBLE
RELATED CONTENT
Energy shortages appear, as a big question about the interaction of energy and environment are rais...
A manifesto on the world ecology year 1972 at a meeting held in San Francisco in July 1969....
Compare conventional versus organic ingredients for making a simple pizza and find out why organic ...
Christian Ecology January/February 1989 Rockcastle County in Kentucky is a land both beautiful and ...
Earthrover Car is a great alternative to develop for a simple, reliable form of transportation that...
According to our experience, a simple 24-inch-deep soil
preparation allows four times as many plants as
usual to be sown in a given space, because the roots have
sufficient room to develop downward. That factor alone,
combined with the growth-promoting effects of compost
treatments and companion planting, allows anyone adhering
to the techniques to quadruple his or her
vegetable production! Such harvests can be (and have been)
obtained even in the first year of planting.
Furthermore, research performed at the University of
California at Berkeley indicates that the overall root
health level of produce grown in agricultural soil has
declined : . . and that even a 2% to 4% increase in such
health could result in a two-to four-fold increase in field
crop harvests. The method we've been experimenting with
makes such an improvement possible by texturizing,
aerating, fertilizing, and watering the soil as a matter of
standard practice.
So . . . if you combine the arithmetic spacing and root
health factors, it's easy to see that biodynamic/French
intensive techniques can, ideally, produce sixteen
times more food than is produced by currently accepted
farming and gardening methods here in the United States.
Other factors, of course—such as climate, soil
condition, and type of vegetable, grain or fruit, and the
degree of skill of the farmer or gardener—can (and
do) reduce that optimal figure.
OUR YIELDS THUS FAR
When we began experimenting with b/F intensive techniques
in 1972, our soil was in relatively poor condition (would
you believe a pH of 8.0? ) . . . and our own
skills, of course, required considerable enrichment also.
Since that time, however, both factors have been improved
and our annual harvests—measured under reasonably
controlled test conditions—have shown a corresponding
increase. They have, in fact, varied between two and
sixteen times the national, California, or Santa Clara
County averages.
The table below will give you some idea of how we fared as
compared to the U.S. averages for each year and crop cited:
As you can see, some harvests have actually doubled from
year to year as the soil in our test area has improved . .
. which indicates still another major advantage of the b/F
intensive method: Yields are apparently sustainable in an
environmentally balanced way.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 | 3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Next >>