ENDANGERED SPECIES LIST: EXTINCT?
(Page 3 of 5)
The Brazil nut incident has re-ignited the ongoing debate
over the Food and Drug Administration's labeling of
genetically engineered foods. According to Dr. Margaret
Mellon of the Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington,
D.C., the FDA is disregarding the public's desire to have
genetically engineered foods labeled.
RELATED CONTENT
Save the Chickens! December/January 1996 Garden and Yard By John Vivian Raise your own chickens and...
A NEW ENDANGERED SPECIES: THE FAMILY FARMER May/June 1984 The subjects of MOTHER NO. 84's Plowboy I...
An expert from the Union of Concerned Scientists says the overuse of antibiotics in agriculture — j...
"Almost every survey that has been done says that consumers
would like to be told," says Mellon. "But consumer desires
and fifty cents will get you about a cup of coffee at the
FDA."
Dr. Mellon claims that although the FDA does have a policy
of labeling biogenetically engineered foods, it is one that
caters to the biotech companies themselves.
"The FDA policy relies heavily on the industry in making
its decisions about premarket review and notification.
Instead of making these decisions itself, the agency
provides decision trees for industry. The policy relies
almost entirely on the industry to make the right
decisions. Since the FDA will not be aware of the full
range of genetically engineered products, it will not be in
a position to overrule these decisions."
Under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, all GRAS
(Generally Recognized As Safe) substances won't require
premarket government approval. The labeling of all other
foods is the responsibility of the biotech companies
themselves, a responsibility that Dr. Mellon feels won't be
fulfilled unless it serves a company's needs.
"Companies," she says, "will voluntarily label engineered
food only when the engineering has produced a trait with
direct appeal or benefit to the consumer."
In the case of the allergenic soybeans, Pioneer Hi-Bred
International acted quickly and responsibly in publicly
reporting their findings.
"When we did the first work, we knew there was a potential
for allergenicity, and that's why we sponsored the
University of Nebraska study," says Pioneer Hi-Bred
spokesman Tim Martin. "When we actually got confirmation
that there was an allergen involved we decided to
discontinue the program and look in other directions."
To date, only one biogenetically engineered food, the
Flavr-Savr tomato, has been certified as marketable by the
Food and Drug Administration. The Flavr-Savr, designed by
Calgene Incorporated, is a tomato designed to stay fresh
longer than conventional tomatoes. According to Calgene,
the Flavr-Savr will be in stores starting January 1997. It
will be labeled as a genetically modified food and will
come with an information packet explaining the science of
genetic food modification.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 | 3 |
4 |
5 |
Next >>