The 10 Best Places to Live The GOOD Life
(Page 7 of 7)
August/September 1996
By the Mother Earth News editors
Look Well
RELATED CONTENT
Before you hire a contractor or start building, read this expert advice....
We simply weren't able to resist printing this lighthearted submission from a young reader....
Here are ways of preparing sprouts. Try these tantalizing recipes: eyeopener breakfast sprouts, ome...
With its 24,000 mirrors glistening under the Southern California sun, the new Sierra SunTower is pr...
Before putting your money down on a wood pellet stove, do your research to determine whether the fu...
Our admittedly non-scientific survey shows that areas vary greatly — often within short distances. Virginia residents living in the D.C. suburbs are not happy, but in the Tidewater area along Chesapeake Bay or out in the Appalachians, life is great! In Massachusetts, the Boston area is crowded and overpriced, while nontourist parts of Cape Cod are delightful. The urban areas of MOTHER'S birthplace, North Carolina, get mixed reviews but the Piedmont and shore are exceptional places to live!
In sum: Paradise is where you find it. So get started! We at MOTHER and the good readers who contributed to the survey all wish you good hunting and hope our efforts will help a little.
Methodology
In the previous two issues, readers were asked to return a questionnaire indicating their satisfaction with the climate, land, job and housing markets, and public services of their current or prospective country-home locales — together, indicating suitability of an area to a MOTHER-style life of independence on the land. Responses were received from southern California to British Columbia and Alaska, from Florida to Maine and the Maritimes, and in areas as diverse as cosmopolitan Las Vegas and parts of southern Alaska that are accessible only by air during the long winters. The map tabulates the findings.
By no means statistically valid, the survey neglects such major parts of North America as west Texas, all of North Dakota, and most of Canada. The wholly negative results from Tennessee and thin (if positive) results from much of the Far West are a fluke due to the informal nature of the survey (a statistically inconclusive, self-selected sample to use statisticians' jargon.) However, a broad enough scattering of MOTHER's readers responded to the survey — offering consistent-enough observations to reach the broad conclusion itemized in this article.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 | 7 |