HOME FIRE PROTECTION
(Page 6 of 6)
THE "I" WORD
RELATED CONTENT
Overview of different types of fire extinguishers, including how do they rate, know what you're buy...
The four types of fire extinguishers....
Tips for keeping Thanksgiving cooking safe enough to enable cook and guests to give thanks...
Use auto body putty and Black Tie creosote substitute to repair shoes....
The effects of climate change are felt around the world, but coastal cities may be at more of a ris...
IONIZING SMOKE DETECTORSContain a small
amount of radioactive material which may, under certain
circumstances, pose a health hazard. Theories on the
effects of low levels of radiation tend to be very
controversial. Extremes of scientific opinion include the
notion that low-level radiation may be beneficial as well
as the conviction that its effects are grossly
underestimated. Faced with such a lack of consensus, it's
probably safest to be cautious.
Almost every expert would agree that you are safer with an
ionizing smoke detector than with no detector at all. And
most would contend that it's worth having an ionizing
detector even if you also have a photoelectric model. The
risk from fire is simply far greater than that posed by
radiation from a smoke detector. In fact, there is probably
next to no risk to a homeowner unless the foil packaging
around the radioactive isotope is broken. Nonetheless, you
should handle an ionizing detector carefully and dispose of
it only by shipping it back to its manufacturer. Never take
an ionizing detector apart, and don't keep it in the house
if it is damaged. Use it with good sense and in good
health.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 | 6 |