GETTING BY WITHOUT CFA's
(Page 3 of 10)
Some CFC refrigerantinstalled in the 1950s
could still be in use today.
RELATED CONTENT
THE FLYING OZONE RANCH'S UNPATENTED SKYWAY OF DEAT July/August 1978 by BRAD LEMLEY Every farm or ho...
Here are some substitutes for coffee using native plants: acorn, burdock, California coffeeberry, c...
Here’s a list of ecological alternatives, from The Ecological Living Handbook....
Here are short tips on V-8 engines, electrical energy consumption, geothermal energy, the fuel of t...
Conserving water in the bathroom with low volume flushers, non-recycling waterless toilets, waterle...
Following this action, several European nations and the
United States have called for total phaseout of CFCs by the
year 2000. In the U.S. there are several bills in Congress
that would accomplish a phaseout by 2000 or even sooner.
One of the big questions that remains is whether other
compounds will be added to the restrictions. The HCFCs,
including HCFC-22, which is currently available, are much
less damaging to the ozone, but they do exhibit some
ozone-depletion effects-between 3 and 7% that of CFC-11 and
-12. Many of the replacements being investigated by
chemical companies are in this class of compounds.
In addition to destroying the protective ozone layer, CFCs
are also greenhouse gases. They trap outgoing heat from the
earth's surface even more effectively than carbon
dioxide-the number one offender. Had there been no
constraints placed on CFC aerosol use in the late '70s,
some experts claim that CFCs would today account for more
global warming potential than CO 2 !
Finding Alternatives
Finding alternatives to CFCs involves first figuring out
which products use the chemicals. That isn't always easy.
Table 1 lists the most common CFC and halon compounds,
along with their relative ozone-depletion effects,
quantities produced, and uses. To help you figure out
whether a particular product contains one of the more
harmful CFCs or halons, the chemical names you might find
on a label are given. But unless you have a degree in
organic chemistry, you may have some trouble even reading
the names, let alone recognizing them.
It's not always easy to determine which
products use
ozone-depleting chemicals.
The next problem you'll encounter is that not all products
manufactured with CFCs are identified as such. Rigid foam
insulation and flexible foam, for example, do not list the
foaming agents. Several pieces of legislation currently
under consideration would require manufacturers to clearly
identify products that contain ozone-harmful CFCs.
The following paragraphs cover the most common products
using CFCs. The information should help you both to
identify those products and materials using CFCs and to
find alternatives.
Insulation
Most rigid-board insulation is produced with CFC-11 or -12
as the blowing agent. Injected into the foam as a liquid
during manufacturing, the CFC boils, causing gas bubbles to
form in the curing foam. The cured foam has bubbles of CFC
gas throughout. A major benefit of CFC-produced insulation
is that CFCs do not conduct heat as quickly as air does, so
the R-value is higher. You get more insulation in a thinner
layer. As a result, CFC-foamed insulation materials have
grown tremendously in popularity over the past 20 years.
Insulation accounts for about 30% of the CFCs used each
year.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 | 3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
Next >>