PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES OF DEFAULT
(Page 2 of 3)
If any banks should go broke in the process, this will
bring on a further tightening of credit and a further
reduction of liquidity. In this kind of an atmosphere,
business will not expand. Everything will be pointing to a
contraction. This knowledge is widespread enough now to
bring on an inevitable contraction in the marketplace and
through the general public. People facing this will buy
less. Unemployment will increase.
RELATED CONTENT
Humanity’s collective demands first surpassed the Earth’s regenerative capacity around 1980. The cu...
A cluster of new research reports reveal the grim economic impact that climate change will have on ...
Addressing Congress on his plan to transform the economy, President Obama pushed for a cap on carbo...
Wealth for all is achievable, but not without considerable work and effort....
economic outlook March/April 1980 ONE WISE ELDER OF THE TRIBE IS WORTH AT LEAST TWENTY MILLION SLIC...
It's a mystery to me how so many of these writers can
holler, "More inflation." Where does the inflation come
from? Where is there a plentiful money supply? We have just
said that over $300 billion in the liquidity barrel is
leaking out and will eventually come right out of the
barrel. Let the Fed try to put in funds at the rate they
are disappearing or being destroyed. And we have only
started so far. No way in God's world can the Federal
Reserve of the United States handle this global problem.
Even if some extra money is created by the Fed, it will be
as a drop in the bucket compared with the general climate
of contraction and the huge loan losses suffered and
finally admitted.
We may not have dramatic bank failures only a chorus of
gaspings as some of them go under almost unnoticed.
The interest payments which the banks have counted on must
be stricken from the books. The earnings statements that
accountants look at when they advise on the reasonable
price of a stock will be drastically knocked back because
of the loss of this interest. Also, loans will necessarily
have to be written down by degrees. We are not going to
bury this corpse in one piece. We'll hack him up and do it
gradually. But the smell will be around, and the days of
plentiful money—the era of inflation-will have been
banished for a long, long time to come. What we are facing,
therefore, is a deflation starting out mildly at first and
growing more severe as time passes. And the results of that
will be classic.
[1] Cash will be king, and the same amount of dollars in
cash will buy more next year than this year, and still more
the following year. This will be a reversal of a 30or
40-year trend, when the idea was always to owe a lot of
money so you could pay it back with cheap dollars. Now if
you owe a lot of money, you'll pay it back with more
expensive dollars, or it will be foreclosed, and you will
lose the article you have bought.
The population is not ready for this.
Deflation cannot be stopped by a simple move of printing
more money by the Fed. Creating more figures in books does
not stop a shrinking economy. The idea that
printing mountains of money results in an inflationary
depression is baloney. There is no such thing as an
inflationary depression. A depression means that there is
very little money around. So how can you possibly and
ridiculously have an inflationary depression, which some
newsletter writers mouth around as if it were a real and
honest-to-goodness term. They read it somewhere, and they
think it sounds good. Plentiful money and tight credit do
not coexist.