PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES OF DEFAULT
Examination of probable consequences of default, including consequences of the mounting debts in Third World countries on the banking industry.
Economic outlook
RELATED CONTENT
Humanity’s collective demands first surpassed the Earth’s regenerative capacity around 1980. The cu...
A cluster of new research reports reveal the grim economic impact that climate change will have on ...
Addressing Congress on his plan to transform the economy, President Obama pushed for a cap on carbo...
Wealth for all is achievable, but not without considerable work and effort....
economic outlook March/April 1980 ONE WISE ELDER OF THE TRIBE IS WORTH AT LEAST TWENTY MILLION SLIC...
Probably the single biggest threat to our national
economy-and to our own individual abilities to make ends
meet-is the likelihood that the billions of dollars loaned
by U.S. banks to various Third World countries will never
be repaid. And, with that likelihood inexorably moving
toward certainty, we think that the following essay by Vern
Myers, whose wisdom has graced this column often in the
past, can provide a worthwhile description of what the
overall effects of that default might be. Now, we're not
saying that Vern's predictions are 100% sure, mind you, but
we are saying that he's been too danged right too many
times in the past to be safely ignored! (Excerpted courtesy
of Myers Finance & Energy, Suite 310 Peyton Building,
Spokane, WA 99201.)
"There is no chance of any principal being repaid for a
decade or more."—Henry Kissinger.
Let's you and me take it as a fair statement that the debts
[of the Third World countries] are not going to be paid for
at least ten years—if ever.
How is this to come about, and what is the likely effect on
us? Here are the possibilities:
[1] The debtor countries will declare a default—and
the banks will go broke.
[2] The banks will declare the debtor countries in default,
and the banks will go broke.
[3] Neither the banks nor the debtor countries will cry
default, but the debtor countries will just stop
paying—de facto moratorium.
[4] The debtor countries will pay a little bit of interest
once in a while.
The scenarios in [1] and [2] above will not happen. The
debtor countries would have nothing to gain and would only
be cutting their throats to declare a moratorium or a
default. The banks would bring the ax down on their heads
right away rather than suffer gradual severance. In the
process of gradual destruction, there is always a chance
they might get away.
The third and fourth are the most likely probabilities, and
the fourth is a little more likely than the third, because
the debtor countries mostly don't have even the money to
pay full interest. This will produce a gradual public
deterioration of bank credibility, and in confidence that
banks can survive. What we are looking at, then, is the
total demobilization of $300 billion or $400 billion that,
up to now, we included in the liquidity of our Western
monetary system.
Let's face it, as long as the situation can go on this way,
the U.S. government is not going to pay the banks, and it
is not going to pay the debtor countries. So there will be
no extra dollars floating around on that account. Indeed,
the net result of this will be a great tightening of the
existing liquidity. Banks will become very tightfisted,
will take few chances. It's a period of contraction in
lending.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
Next >>